This study appeared in full in the last issue of Research Ethics Review (2007; 3 (3): 91). It concerned the ethical review of a qualitative research study in which the participants are recovering from acute mental health problems. Debate focussed on the issue of how informed consent was to be obtained.
References
1.
OsbornDPJFulfordKWM. Psychiatric research: what ethical concerns do LRECs encounter? A postal survey. J Med Ethics2003; 29: 55–56.
2.
Royal College of Psychiatrists. Guidelines for researchers and for research ethics committees on psychiatric research involving human participants. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2001.
3.
SteelR. Involving marginalised and vulnerable people in research: A consultation document. INVOLVE, 2004. Available at http://www.invo.org.uk/All-Publications.asp (accessed on 8/1/2007).
4.
HartASaundersAThomasH. Attuned practice: a service user study of specialist child and adolescent mental health, UK. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale2005; 14(1) Special issue: inclusion and mental health in the new Europe: 22–31.
5.
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Helsinki, Finland: 18th WMA1964, rev Tokyo, Japan: 29th WMA, 1975; Venice, Italy: 35th WMA, 1983; Hong Kong: 41st WMA, 1989; Somerset West, South Africa: 48th WMA, 1996; Edinburgh, Scotland: 52nd WMA, 2000. Available at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed on 8/1/2007).
6.
SteelR. op cit.
7.
MuroffJRHoeraufSLKimSYH. Is psychiatric research stigmatized? An experimental survey of the public. Schizophren Bull2006; 32(1): 129–136.
8.
KovnickJAppelbaumPHogeSLeadbetterR. Competence to consent to research among long-stay inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv2003; 54(9): 1247–1252.
9.
Mental Capacity Act 2005. Section 2(3). London: The Stationery Office.
LevineCFadenFGradyCHammerschmidtDEckenwilerLSugarmanJ. The limitations of ‘vulnerability’ as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics2004; 4(3): 44.
12.
KovnickJAppelbaumPHogeSLeadbetterR. Competence to consent to research among long-stay inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services2003; 54(9): 1247–1252.
13.
Mental Capacity Act 2005. op cit. Section 3.
14.
BrodyBAMcCulloughLBSharpRR. Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. JAMA2005; 294(11): 1411–1414.
15.
FloryJEmanuelE. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA2004; 292(13): 1593–1601.
16.
DaviesBR. Coercion or collaboration? Nurses doing research with people who have severe mental health problems. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing2005; 12: 106–111.
17.
RamcharanPCutliffeJ. Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the ‘ethics as process’ model. Health and Social Care in the Community2001; 9(6): 358–366.
