This study examines the way that consent is reported for participation in school-based research involving children or young people aged from 5 to 16 years. Databases containing descriptions of research identified during systematic reviews were surveyed to determine to what extent consent is sought, and from whom, and to see whether reporting varied by study characteristics such as the age of participants, the country in which the research was carried out, research design and substantive area of study.
Of a total of 489 studies in school settings involving children or young people, less than a third (n=145:30%) reported seeking consent. Only one in seven (n=66:13%) sought consent from children or young people themselves. Consent was reported significantly more frequently in studies sourced from health promotion reviews, when compared to those sourced from education reviews.
Codes of practice indicate that researchers should seek consent from research participants. This study demonstrates that these principles are often not reflected in practice.
Revised ethical guidelines for educational research. Southwell: British Educational Research Association, 2004.
3.
Guidelines for the ethical conduct of research involving children. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Ethics Committee. Archs Dis in Childh2000; 82: 177–182.
4.
Statement of ethical practice for the British Sociological Association, March 2002 (Appendix updated May 2004). Belmont: British Sociological Association, 2004.
5.
OakleyAPeersmanGOliverS. Social characteristics of participants in health promotion effectiveness research: trial and error?Education for Health1998; 11(3): 305–317.
6.
HardenAOliverS. Who's listening? Systematically reviewing for ethics and empowerment. In OliverSPeersmanG, eds. Using research for effective health promotion. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001:123–137.
7.
OakleyA. Research evidence, knowledge management and educational practice: early lessons from a systematic approach. London Rev of Education2003; 1: 21–33.
AldersonPMorrowV. Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people. 2nd Edition. London: Barnados2004.
10.
EdwardsRAlldredP. Children and young people's views of social research: the case of research on home-school relations. Childhood1999; 6(2): 261–281.
11.
HeathSCharlesVCrowGWilesR. Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Social Research Methodology, Amsterdam, 2004. www.sociology.soton.ac.uk/proj/Informed-Consent/ISA.rtf (accessed 22 July, 2005).
12.
EdwardsSJLLilfordRJBraunholtzDAJacksonJCHewisonJThorntonJ. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomized controlled trials. Hlth Technol Assess1998; 2(15).
13.
HomanR. The principle of assumed consent: the ethics of gate-keeping. In McNameeMBridgesD, eds. The ethics of educational research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2002: 23–39.
14.
MurphyEDingwallRGreatbatchDParkerSWatsonP. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Hlth Technol Assess1998; 2(16).
WebsterALewisGBrownNBoultonM. ESRC Developing a framework for social science research ethics: project update. York, ESRC Research Ethics Framework Project, 2004. http://www.york.ac.uk/res/ref/docs/update250604.pdf (accessed 22 July, 2005).
AldersonP. In the genes or in the stars?Children's competence to consent, Journal of Medical Ethics2002; 18: 119–124.
19.
DoyalL. Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent - with three exceptions. Br Med J1997; 314: 1107–1111.
20.
EsbensenF-ADeschenesEPVogelREWestJArboitKHarrisL. Active parental consent in school-based research. Evaluation Review1996; 20(6): 737–753.
21.
DavidMEdwardsRAlldredP. Children and school-based research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’?Brit Educ Res J2001; 27(3): 347–365.
22.
MorrowV. Using qualitative methods to elicit young people's perspectives on their environments: some ideas for community health initiatives. Hlth Educ Res2001; 16(3): 255–268.
23.
NewmanMElbourneD. Improving the usability of educational research: guidelines for the REPOrting of primary empirical research Studies in Education (The REPOSE Guidelines). Evaluation and Research in Education2004; 18(4): 201–212.
24.
Code of practice on research ethics: responsibilities to research participants. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for the Child and Society, 2005. http://www.gccs.gla.ac.uk/docs/pdf/CodeOfPractice.pdf (accessed 22 July, 2005).
