CownieJ. The role of the lay member. Res Ethics Rev2006; 2(1): 29–30.
2.
AREC response to ‘Implementing the recommendations of the Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees: a consultation'. Response to Recommendation 6. Res Ethics Rev2006; 2(2): 78.
3.
DaviesH. The importance of both research and its proper review: a historical perspective. Res Ethics Rev2006; 2(2): 40–46.
4.
GodfreyR. Categorization of investigation: defining the ethical questions. Res Ethics Rev2006; 2(1): 15–18.
5.
GodfreyR. Categorization of investigation: defining the ethical questions. Res Ethics Rev2006; 2(1): 15–18.