In the first five of these articles I have questioned the justice, and effectiveness, of total dependence in clinical research on willing volunteers. I have explored ways that might better and more equitably spread the burden of participating in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider this question: if consent is the barrier, must we regard consent as indispensable?
References
1.
SingerP in: Matters of life and death. New introductory essays in moral philosophy3rd edition, ed ReganT. New York: McGraw-Hill1993, p 300.
2.
ReganT. The case for animal rights. Berkeley CA: Univ California Press1983, p 243.
3.
FoxM in: Death rites. Law and ethics at the end of life, ed LeeRMorganD. London: Routledge1994, pp 131–174.
4.
HarrisJ. Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics2005; 31: 242–248.
5.
Medical Protection Society. Consent, confidentiality, disclosure of medical records. London: Medical Protection Society1979, repr 1988, p 11.
6.
HarrisJ. The value of life. London: Routledge1985 repr 1992, pp 205–209.
7.
KirbyMD. Informed consent: what does it mean?J Med Ethics1983; 9: 71.
8.
GloverJ. Causing death and saving lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin1990, pp 213–216.
9.
SteinerTJ. Guinea pig duties: 2. The origin of patients’ duties in clinical research. Res Ethics Rev2005; 1: 45–52.
10.
KennedyI. Treat me right. Essays in medical law and ethics. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press1988, pp 217–221.
11.
KoehnD. The ground of professional ethics. London: Routledge1994, p 18.
12.
Ibid, pp 61–68.
13.
Ibid, p 40.
14.
SullivanHS. The psychiatric interview. New York: WW Norton1970, pp 238–239.
15.
MasonJKMcCall SmithRA. Law and medical ethics3rd edition. London: Butterworths1991, p 359.
16.
KennedyI. Treat me right. Essays in medical law and ethics. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press1988, p 214.
17.
MarteauTM. Ethics of clinical research. Brit Med J1989; 299: 513.
18.
BaumM in: Ethics and law in health care and research, ed ByrneP. Chichester: John Wiley1990, p 5.
19.
EisenbergL in: Contemporary issues in bioethics3rd edition, ed BeauchampTLWalterLeR. Belmont CA: Wadsworth1989, p 429.
20.
Report of the President's Commission, repr in: Contemporary issues in bioethics3rd edition, ed BeauchampTLWalterLeR. Belmont CA: Wadsworth1989, p 393.
21.
Chief Justice of Canada. Cited by Brooke H in: Consent and the incompetent patient: ethics, law, and medicine, ed Hirsch SR, Harris J. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists 1988, p 12.
22.
JonasH in: Contemporary issues in bioethics3rd edition, ed BeauchampTLWalterLeR. Belmont CA: Wadsworth1989, pp 434–436.
23.
SteinerTJ. Guinea pig duties: 5. Coercion and inducement into clinical research. Res Ethics Rev2006; 2: 3–9.
24.
SteinerTJ. Guinea pig duties: 1. The need for clinical research. Res Ethics Rev2005; 1: 5–12.
25.
FreedenM. Rights. Milton Keynes: Open Univ Press1991, p 80.
26.
GillonR in: Commercial sponsorship in the provision of healthcare, ed TurnerP. London: Royal Society of Medicine1993, p 59.
27.
JohnsonAG. Pathways in medical ethics. London: Edward Arnold1990, p 63.
28.
CampbellAV in: Medicine and moral reasoning, ed FulfordKWMGillettGSoskiceJM. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press1994, pp 184–192.
29.
GloverJ. Causing death and saving lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin1990, pp 218–220.
30.
HarrisJ. The survival lottery. Philosophy1975; 50: 81–87.
31.
MacLeanA. The elimination of morality. London: Routledge1993, p 100.
32.
BrookeE in: Consent and the incompetent patient: ethics, law, and medicine, ed HirschSRHarrisJ. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists1988, pp 19–20.
33.
EvansDEvansM. A decent proposal. Ethical review of clinical research. Chichester: John Wiley1996, pp 94–97.
