What does it mean to be a good citizen when coping with sustainability challenges in politically polarized and values-conflicting contexts? This study explores Taiwanese students’ imagination of good citizens as they deliberate over a highly controversial local environmental policy. Tracing five focal students’ learning trajectories, this study unpacks how the students perceive their own and the adult stakeholders’ roles in this controversy. Results revealed students’ consistent distrust of the adult stakeholders. Nevertheless, they developed expectations of the stakeholders as they learned more about the political complexities of this issue. Students’ imaginations about good citizens include four elements: engaging in public issues, respecting different opinions, rational communication, and addressing the local’s concerns and needs. Based on the results, I argue that pluralistic values are needed for preparing citizens to cope with sustainability challenges in multicultural and pluralistic societies.
BarryJ (2006) Resistance is fertile: From environmental to sustainability citizenship. In: DobsonABellD (eds) Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–48.
2.
BellDR (2004) Creating green citizens? Political liberalism and environmental education. Journal of Philosophy of Education38(1): 37–54.
3.
BerkowitzARFordMEBrewerCA (2005). A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy, and environmental citizenship in environmental education. In: JohnsonEMappinM (eds) Environmental Education and Advocacy: Changing Perspectives of Ecology and Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.227–266.
4.
BohmanJRehgW (1997). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
BoontinandVPetcharamesreeS (2018) Civic/citizenship learning and the challenges for democracy in Thailand. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice13(1): 36–50.
6.
ChanYW (2023) Developing youth toward pluralistic environmental citizenship: A Taiwanese place-based curriculum case study. Environmental Education Research1(29): 121–147. DOI:10.1080/13504622.2022.2093334
7.
ChanYWJohnsonMW (2023) Exploration of rural Taiwanese youth’s self-agency in environmental policy controversy deliberations. Pedagogies: An International Journal18(4): 596–613.
ChengA SKrugerLEDanielsSE (2003) “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research. Agenda. Society & Natural Resources16(2): 87–104.
ConnellyJ (2006) The virtues of environmental citizenship. In: DobsonABellD (eds) Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.49–73.
12.
CreswellJW (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks and California: Sage.
13.
DobsonA (2007) Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development15(5): 276–285.
14.
DryzekJ S (2002) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
GutmannAThompsonD (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
HadjichambisACParaskeva-HadjichambiD (2020). Education for environmental citizenship: The pedagogical approach. In: HadjichambisACReisPParaskeva-HadjichambiD (eds) Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education. Springer, pp. 237–261.
17.
HessDEMcAvoyP (2014) The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
HortonD (2006) Demonstrating environmental citizenship? A study of everyday life among green activists. In DobsonABellD (eds) Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.127–150.
19.
HouserNO (2009) Ecological democracy: An environmental approach to citizenship education. Theory and Research in Social Education37(2): 192–214.
20.
HuSH (2012) The effects of deliberative learning on Taiwanese middle school students’ democratic behaviour. Pacific-Asian Education Journal24(1): 31–40.
21.
HuntingtonSP (1993) The Third WAVE: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Vol. 4). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
22.
IeongMUWongKLLiH, et al. (2022) University students’ perceptions of “good citizens” in Greater China: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, and Mainland China. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education: 1–17.
23.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRT (2009) Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher38(1): 37–51.
24.
KuangXXKennedyKJ (2014) Asian students perceptions of “good” citizenship: The role of democratic values and attitudes to traditional culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development (APJED)3(1): 33–42.
25.
LeeWO (2009) Conceptualizing Citizenship and Citizenship Education: A Trajectory of Exploring Asian Perspective. Hong Kong: Chair Professors Public Lecture Series, Hong Kong Institute of Education, pp. 2–33.
26.
LiHKuangXLiangM (2023) The changes in Hong Kong students’ perceptions of the “good citizen”: Implications for implementing civic education curriculum. Educational Studies49(2): 334–349.
27.
LiHTanC (2017) Chinese teachers’ perceptions of the “good citizen”: A personally-responsible citizen. Journal of Moral Education46(1): 34–45.
28.
LijmbachSVan ArckenM MVan KoppenCA, et al. (2002). “Your view of nature is not mine!”: Learning about pluralism in the classroom. Environmental Education Research8(2): 121–135.
29.
LinTTTsaiCH (2022) Taking stock of social-political polarization in Asia: Political communication, social media and digital governance. Asian Journal of Communication32(2): 71–74.
30.
LiuM (2000) Civics education in Taiwan: values promoted in the civics curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Education20(1): 73–81.
31.
McAvoyP (2016) Preparing young adults for polarized America. In JournellW (ed.) Teaching Social Studies in an Era of Divisiveness: The Challenges of Discussing Social Issues in a Non-Partisan Way. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.31–46.
32.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political. London: Routledge
33.
NishiyamaK (2023) Creating counter-publics through deliberation in the classroom: The case of philosophy for children. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice18(2): 115–130.
34.
OrrDW (2020). Democracy and the (missing) politics in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education51(4): 270–279.
35.
ParkerWC (2008) Knowing and doing in democratic citizenship education. In LevstikLSTysonCA (eds) Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education. New York: Routledge, pp.65–80.
36.
SchildR (2016) Environmental citizenship: What can political theory contribute to environmental education practice?The Journal of Environmental Education47(1): 19–34.
37.
SternPC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues56(3): 407–424.
38.
SundLÖhmanJ (2014) On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research20(5): 639–659.
WarwickP (2012) Climate change and sustainable citizenship education. In ArthurJCreminH (eds) Debates in Citizenship Education. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 132–145.
41.
WestheimerJKahneJ (2004) What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal41(2): 237–269.
42.
WongKL (2021) Teachers’ perceptions of preparing “good citizens” for the democratic development: Hong Kong case. Educational Studies47(2): 238–255.
