In 2005, Kitson and McCully introduced the ‘risk-taking’ continuum, representing the multiple ways in which teachers in post-conflict societies deal with the history of conflict in the classroom. ‘Avoiders’, at one extreme, refrain from teaching the violent past, while at the other extreme ‘risk-takers’ analyse multiple perspectives on what happened and why. Since their seminal study, scholars have increasingly studied the challenges and opportunities related to teaching the violent past. Yet, so far no study has empirically tested and applied the continuum. Drawing on a survey of 558 secondary school teachers in post-conflict Ambon, Indonesia, we analyse the proportion and characteristics of ‘risk-takers’ as compared to ‘avoiders’. Our results show that ‘risk-takers’ represent a slim majority. While ‘risk-taking’ is associated with political interest and higher levels of education, teachers who suffered much harm during the conflict, whose students belong to a religious group other than theirs and/or those who think conflict causes have been addressed are less supportive of conflict history teaching.
AbbeyDWansinkBGJ (2022) Brokers of multiperspectivity in history education in post-conflict societies. Journal of Peace Education19: 67–90.
2.
AdamJ (2010) How ordinary folk became involved in the Ambonese conflict: Understanding private opportunities during communal violence. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia166(1): 25–48.
3.
Alpha AmirrachmanR (2014) Education in the conflict-affected Moluccas local tradition, identity politics and school principal leadership. South East Asia Research22(4): 561–578.
4.
Al QurtubyS (2015) Christianity and militancy in Eastern Indonesia: Revisiting the maluku violence. South Asian Studies4(2): 313–339.
5.
Al QurtubyS (2016) Religious Violence and Conciliation in Indonesia: Christians and Muslims in the Moluccas. New York: Routledge.
BarronP (2019) When Violence Works: Postconflict Violence and Peace in Indonesia. Cornell University Press. Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/64328 (accessed 6 August 2020).
8.
BarronPJaffreySVarshneyA (2016) When large conflicts subside: The ebbs and flows of violence in postsuharto Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies16(2): 191–217.
9.
Bar-TalDHarelAS (2002) Teachers as agents of political influence in the Israeli high schools. Teaching and Teacher Education18(1): 121–134.
10.
Bar-TalDRosenY (2009) Peace education in societies involved in intractable conflicts: Direct and indirect models. Review of Educational Research79(2): 557–575.
11.
Bar-TalDOrenNNets-ZehngutR (2014) Sociopsychological analysis of conflict-supporting narratives. Journal of Peace Research51(5): 662–675.
BartonKCMcCullyAW (2005) History, identity, and the school curriculum in Northern Ireland: An empirical study of secondary students’ ideas and perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies37(1): 85–116.
14.
BellinoMJPaulsonJAnderson WordenE (2017) Working through difficult pasts: Toward thick democracy and transitional justice in education. Comparative Education53(3): 313–332.
15.
BentrovatoD (2017) History textbook writing in post-conflict societies: From battlefield to site and means of conflict transformation. In: PsaltisCCarreteroMČehajić-ClancyS (eds) History Education and Conflict Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.37–76.
16.
BentrovatoDWassermannJ (2018) Mediating transitional justice: South Africa’s TRC in history textbooks and the implications for peace. Global Change Peace & Security30(3): 335–351.
17.
BertrandJ (2004) Democratization and religious and nationalist conflict in post-Suharto Indonesia. In: HendersSJ (ed) Democratization and Identity: Regimes and Ethnicity in East and Southeast Asia. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp.17–200.
18.
BräuchlerB (2019) From transitional to performative justice: Peace activism in the aftermath of communal violence. Global Change Peace & Security31(2): 201–220.
19.
CarterCC (2007) Teacher Preparation for peace-building in United States of America and Northern Ireland. In: Bekerman Z and McGlynn C (eds) Addressing Ethnic Conflict Through Peace Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp.245–258.
20.
ChhabraM (2017) Text and Contexts: Pedagogical Practices for a History Textbook Lesson on the 1947 British India Partition. In: ElmersjöHÅClarkAVinterekM (eds) International Perspectives on Teaching Rival Histories. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp.87–106.
21.
Clarke-HabibiS (2018) Teachers’ perspectives on educating for peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Education15(2): 144–168.
22.
ColeEA (2007) Transitional Justice and the reform of history education. International Journal of Transitional Justice1(1): 115–137.
23.
ColeEA (2017) No Legacy for Transitional Justice Efforts Without Education. International Center for Transitional Justice: New York, NY, USA.
DaviesL (2016) The politics of peace education in post-conflict countries. In: Langer A and Brown GK (eds) Building Sustainable Peace. New York City: Oxford University Press, pp.181–199, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757276.003.0011
26.
DaviesL (2017) Justice-sensitive education: The implications of transitional justice mechanisms for teaching and learning. Comparative Education53(3): 333–350.
27.
De BaetsA (2015) Post-conflict history education moratoria: A balance. World Studies in Education16(1): 5–30.
28.
DiStefanoCZhuMMindrilaD (2009) Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation14(1): 20.
29.
ErnasS (2012) Policy of social conflict resolution: Implementation of the Malino agreement in Maluku. Journal of Government and Politics3(2): 297–324.
30.
FieldA (2014) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th edn.London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
31.
GellmanM (2015) Teaching silence in the schoolroom: Whither national history in Sierra Leone and El Salvador?Third World Quarterly36(1): 147–161.
32.
GoldbergT (2017) The official, the empathetic and the critical: Three approaches to history teaching and reconciliation in Israel. In: PsaltisCCarreteroMČehajić-ClancyS (eds) History Education and Conflict Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.277–299.
33.
GossJ (2000) Understanding the “Maluku Wars”: Overview of sources of communal conflict and prospects for peace. Cakalele11: 7–39.
34.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
35.
HarrisRClarkeG (2011) Embracing diversity in the history curriculum: A study of the challenges facing trainee teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education41(2): 159–175.
KelloKWagnerW (2017) History teaching as ‘Propaganda’? Teachers’ communication styles in post-transition societies. In: PsaltisCCarreteroMČehajić-ClancyS (eds) History Education and Conflict Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.201–230.
38.
KhairunisaAWahabR (2019) Synergy between character education and local wisdom. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research326(ICCIE 2018): 64–70.
39.
KitsonAMcCullyA (2005) You hear about it for real in school.’ Avoiding, containing and risk-taking in the history classroom. Teaching History120(120): 32–37.
40.
KleinS (2017) Preparing to teach a slavery past: History teachers and educators as navigators of historical distance. Theory & Research in Social Education45(1): 75–109.
KorostelinaK (2015) Reproduction of conflict in history teaching in Ukraine: A social identity theory analysis. Identity15(3): 221–240.
43.
KorthagenFAJKesselsJKosterB, et al. (2001) Linking Theory and Practice: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
KuppensLLangerA (2016) To address or not to address the violent past in the classroom? That is the question in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Peace Education13(2): 153–171.
45.
KuppensLLangerA (2020) Reconciling before educating? Narratives of conflict and peace among teachers in Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Intercultural Relations76: 37–51.
46.
LauritzenSMNodelandTS (2017) What happened and why? Considering the role of truth and memory in peace education curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies49(4): 437–455.
47.
McCullyA (2012) History teaching, conflict and the legacy of the past. Education Citizenship and Social Justice7(2): 145–159.
48.
PanggabeanSR (2018) Konflik Dan Perdamaian Etnis Di Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan: PT Pustaka Alvabet.
49.
PaulsonJ (2015) “Whether and How?” History Education about Recent and Ongoing Conflict: A Review of Research. Available at: https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/39649 (accessed 7 August 2020).
50.
PaulsonJBellinoMJ (2017) Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: An analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education53(3): 351–378.
SakkiIPirttilä-BackmanA-M (2019) Aims in teaching history and their epistemic correlates: A study of history teachers in ten countries. Pedagogy Culture and Society27(1): 65–85.
53.
SalomonGNevoB (2002) Peace Education: The Concept, Principles, and Practices around the World. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
54.
SayedYCarrimNBadroodienA, et al. (2018) Learning to Teach in Post-Apartheid South Africa – ‘Student Teachers’ Encounters with Initial Teacher Education (YSayeded). Stellenbosch: African Sun Media.
55.
SchulzeKE (2017) The “ethnic” in Indonesia’s communal conflicts: Violence in Ambon, Poso, and Sambas. Ethnic and Racial Studies40(12): 2096–2114.
56.
SheplerSWilliamsJH (2017) Understanding Sierra Leonean and Liberian teachers’ views on discussing past wars in their classrooms. Comparative Education53(3): 418–441.
57.
SkåråsM (2021) Teaching and learning the most recent history in divided societies emerging from conflict: A review of the literature through the lens of social justice. Journal of Peace Education18(3): 282–308.
TajimaY (2014) The Institutional Origins of Communal Violence: Indonesia’s Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139235716.
TibbittsFLWeldonG (2017) History curriculum and teacher training: Shaping a democratic future in post-apartheid South Africa?Comparative Education53(3): 442–461.
64.
TurnerKT (2006) Competing Myths of Nationalist Identity: Ideological Perceptions of Conflict in Ambon, Indonesia. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University. Available at: https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/374/ (accessed 19 March 2020).
65.
van KlinkenG (2001) The Maluku wars: Bringing Society back in. Indonesia71(71): 1–26.
66.
van KlinkenG (2007) Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia: Small Town Wars, 1st edn. New York: Routledge.
67.
van KlinkenG (2014) Ale Rasa beta Rasa. In: ManuputtyJSalampessyZAli-FauziI (eds) CARITA ORANG Basudara; Kisah-Kisah Perdamaian Dari Maluku, 1st edn. Jakarta: Lembaga Antar Iman Maluku, pp.1–427.
68.
WeinsteinHMFreedmanSWHughsonH (2007) School voices: Challenges facing education systems after identity-based conflicts. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice2(1): 41–71.
69.
YogevE (2012) The image of the 1967 war in Israeli history textbooks as test case: Studying an active past in a protracted regional conflict. Oxford Review of Education38(2): 171–188.
70.
ZembylasMCharalambousCCharalambousP (2016) Peace Education in a Conflict-Affected Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
ZembylasMKambaniF (2012) The teaching of controversial issues during elementary-level history instruction: Greek-Cypriot teachers’ perceptions and emotions. Theory & Research in Social Education40(2): 107–133.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
