Engaging Youth for Positive Change is a local civic engagement program focused on youth and young adults in the U.S. state of Illinois, and guides them through the process of adopting a local ordinance by working with their local city councils or other governing bodies. Researchers collected two waves of data from EYPC participants to quantitatively assess associations between program participation and changes in a variety of key factors relating to civic engagement. Initial findings indicate participants reported significant increases in variables associated with civic participation, including teamwork, leadership, and internal political efficacy. Furthermore, participants at more rigorous implementation sites reported significantly higher levels of critical civic engagement indicators compared to their peers at less rigorous implementation sites. This paper discusses EYPC in detail, findings from analyses and program evaluation, and concludes with a discussion on next steps regarding how EYPC and similar programs may enhance civic engagement among youth and young adult populations.
AlbaceteGG (2014) Young People’s Political Participation in Western Europe: Continuity or Generational Change?New York: Springer.
2.
Anderson-ButcherDAmoroseAJLowerLM, et al. (2016) The case for the perceived social competence scale II. Research on Social Work Practice26(4): 419–428.
3.
AstutoJRuckM (2010) Early childhood as a foundation for civic engagement. In: SherrodLTorney-PurtaJFlanaganC (eds) Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp.249–276.
4.
AugsbergerACollinsMEGeckerW (2017) Best practices for youth engagement in municipal government. National Civic Review106(1): 9–16.
5.
Baskin-SommersASimmonsCConleyM, et al. (2021) Adolescent civic engagement: Lessons from Black lives matter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118(41): e2109860118.
6.
BeanCHarlowMFornerisT (2017) Examining the importance of supporting youth’s basic needs in one youth leadership programme: A case study exploring programme quality. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth22(2): 195–209.
7.
BerthinG (2021) Youth civic engagement in developing countries: Lessons from Belize and Guatemala. In EC Matto, AR Millett McCartney, EA Bennion, A Blair, T Sun and D Whitehead (Eds) Teaching Civic EngagementGlobally, 167–183. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
8.
BrenerNDKannLShanklinS, et al. (2013) Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system—2013. MMWR Supplements62(1): 1–20.
9.
BrennanMABarnettRV (2009) Bridging community and youth development: Exploring theory, research, and application. Community Development40: 305–310.
10.
BrennanMABarnettRVLesmeisterMK (2007) Enhancing local capacity and youth involvement in the community development process. Community Development Journal38(4): 13–27.
11.
BrennanMABarnettRVMcGrathB (2009) The intersection of youth and community development in Ireland and Florida: Building stronger communities through youth civic engagement. Community Development40: 331–345.
12.
BuntaineMTDanielsBDevlinC (2018) Can information outreach increase participation in community-driven development? A field experiment near Bwindi National Park, Uganda. World Development106: 407–421.
13.
CaterMJonesKY (2014) Measuring perceptions of engagement in teamwork in youth development programs. Journal of Experiential Education37(2): 176–186.
14.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019) Youth risk behavior survey. Available at: www.cdc.gov/YRBSS (accessed 12 April 2020).
15.
Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) (2020) Youth voting and civic engagement in America. Available at: https://youthdata.circle.tufts.edu/ (accessed 20 September 2020).
16.
ChanWYOuS-RReynoldsAJ (2014) Adolescent civic engagement and adult outcomes: An examination among urban racial minorities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence43(11): 1829–1843.
17.
ClarkT.CroddyM.HayesW.PhilipsS. (1997). Service learning as civic participation. Theory Into Practice, 36(3), 164–169.
18.
CooperDGHaysSP (2007) Engaging youth for positive change: A critical analysis of case studies on local action. Children Youth and Environments17(2): 433–453.
19.
CraigSCNiemiRGSilverGE (1990) Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior12(3): 289–314.
20.
CrooksCVChiodoDThomasD, et al. (2010) Strengths-based programming for First Nations youth in schools: Building engagement through healthy relationships and leadership skills. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction8(2): 160–173.
21.
CurranTWexlerL (2017) School-based positive youth development: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of School Health87(1): 71–80.
22.
DeBellM (2013) Harder than it looks: Coding political knowledge on the ANES. Political Analysis21: 393–406.
23.
DiAngeloR. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so Hard for White People to Talk about Racism. Beacon Press.
24.
DiemerMALiCH (2011) Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development82(6): 1815–1833.
25.
DiemerMARapaLJ (2016) Unraveling the complexity of critical consciousness, political efficacy, and political action among marginalized adolescents. Child Development87(1): 221–238.
26.
DiemerM. A.VoightA. M.MarchandA. D.BañalesJ. (2019). Political identification, political ideology, and critical social analysis of inequality among marginalized youth. Developmental Psychology, 55(3): 538.
27.
EarlJ.MaherT. V.ElliottT. (2017). Youth, activism, and social movements. Sociology Compass, 11(4): e12465.
28.
FleissJLLevinBPaikMC (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
29.
GabyS (2017) The civic engagement gap(s): Youth participation and inequality from 1976 to 2009. Youth & Society49(7): 923–946.
30.
GliemJAGliemRR (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education.
HaysSPHaysCE (2002) Regulating cigarettes and smoking in 15 American cities: An examination of distinct policy processes. In: Midwest political science association annual conference, Chicago, IL, 25–28April2002.
33.
HickeyAPauli-MylerT (2019) The constraints of youth: Young people, active citizenship and the experience of marginalisation. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education40(3): 372–385.
34.
HopeECSpencerMB (2017) Civic engagement as an adaptive coping response to conditions of inequality: An application of phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST). In: CabreraNJLeyendeckerB (eds) Handbook on Positive Development of Minority Children and Youth. Cham: Springer, pp.421–435.
35.
HyltonME (2018) The role of civic literacy and social empathy on rates of civic engagement among university students. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement22(1): 87–106.
36.
KahneJWestheimerJ (2006) The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics39(2): 289–296.
37.
KisbyBSloamJ (2014) Promoting youth participation in democracy: The role of higher education. In: MycockATongeJ (eds) Beyond the Youth Citizenship Commission: Young People and Politics. London: Political Studies Association, pp.52–56.
38.
KrasnyMEKalbackerLStedmanRC, et al. (2015) Measuring social capital among youth: Applications in environmental education. Environmental Education Research21(1): 1–23.
39.
LevinsonM (2007) The civic achievement gap. CIRCLE Working Paper 51, Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), University of Maryland.
40.
LowerLMNewmanTJAnderson-ButcherD (2017) Validity and reliability of the teamwork scale for youth. Research on Social Work Practice27(6): 716–725.
41.
MattesRDenemarkDAustraliaW, et al. (2017) Citizenship education, schools, and social context: Breaking the mold in South Africa. In: European consortium for political research general conference, Oslo, Norway, 7September2017. Available at: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/b91512e4-a4e6-4fee-a451-a4713c7a5964.pdf (accessed 5 August 2020).
42.
McHughML (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica22(3): 276–282.
43.
McLeodJMEvelandWPHorowitzEM (1998) Going beyond adults and voter turnout: Evaluating a socialization program involving schools, family, and media. In: JohnsonTJHaysCEHaysSP (eds) Engaging the Public: How Government and the Media Can Reinvigorate American Democracy. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp.195–205.
44.
MetzgerAAlvisLOosterhoffB (2020) Adolescent views of civic responsibility and civic efficacy: Differences by rurality and socioeconomic status. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology70: 101183.
45.
MorimotoSAFriedlandLA (2013) Cultivating success: Youth achievement, capital and civic engagement in the contemporary United States. Sociological Perspectives56(4): 523–546.
46.
NiemiRGCraigSCMatteiF (1991) Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review85: 1407–1413.
47.
NorrisP (2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
O’DonoghueJLKirshnerBMcLaughlinM (2006) Youth participation: From myths to effective practice. Prevention & Research13(1): 3–6.
49.
OsofskyH.OsofskyJ.HanselT.LawrasonB.SpeierA. (2018). Building resilience after disasters through the youth leadership program: the importance of community and academic partnerships on youth outcomes. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 12(1): 11–21.
50.
PontesAIHennMGriffithsMD (2019) Youth political (dis)engagement and the need for citizenship education: Encouraging young people’s civic and political participation through the curriculum. Education Citizenship and Social Justice14(1): 3–21.
51.
PrattCFreestoneJ (2000) A Case Study of the Passage of a Local Tobacco Policy to Address Youth Access in Three Cities, Contra Costa County, California, 1999. Martinez, CA: Contra Costa Health Services. Available at: http://www.cchealth.org/topics/tobacco/pdf/case_study_2000.pdf (accessed 27 February 2007).
52.
ProtikAENichols-BarrerIBermanJ, et al. (2018) Bridging the information gap between citizens and local governments: Evidence from a civic participation strengthening program in Rwanda. World Development108: 145–156.
53.
RogersEMPetersonJC (2008) Diffusion of clean indoor air ordinances in the Southwestern United States. Health Education & Behavior35(5): 683–697.
54.
RossHMDearingJARollinsAL (2015) Oklahoma’s youth-driven tobacco policy campaigns: Assessment of impacts and lessons learned. American Journal of Preventive Medicine48(1Suppl 1): S36–S43.
55.
SamDLWanjohiRNAkotiaCS (2019) Civic engagement and participation among Ghanaian and Kenyan students and their correlates. Journal of Civil Society15(1): 42–61.
SloamJ (2014) New voice, less equal: The civic and political engagement of young people in the United States and Europe. Comparative Political Studies47(5): 663–688.
58.
SuterJCBrunsEJ (2009) Effectiveness of the wraparound process for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review12(4): 336–351.
59.
Torney-PurtaJAmadeoJA (2013) The contributions of international large-scale studies in civic education and engagement. In: von DavierMGonzalezEKircshI (eds) The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments: Perspectives From Technology, Economy, and Educational Research. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.87–114.
60.
UnderwoodJMBrenerNThorntonJ, et al. (2020) Overview and methods for the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System – United States, 2019. MMWR Supplements69(1): 1–10.
WalkerJSMasselliBMBlakesleeJ, et al. (2018) Development and testing of an assessment of youth/young adult voice in agency-level advising and decision making. Children and Youth Services Review94: 598–605.
64.
WattenbergMP (2003) Electoral turnout: The new generation gap. British Elections & Parties Review13(1): 159–173.
65.
WattsRJDiemerMAVoightAM (2011) Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development2011(134): 43–57.
66.
YohannanJCarlsonJSShepherdM, et al. (2017) Exploring attrition, fidelity, and effectiveness of wraparound services among low-income youth of different racial backgrounds. Families Systems & Health35(4): 430–438.
67.
YounissJBalesSChristmas-BestV, et al. (2002) Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence12(1): 121–148.
ZeldinS (2004) Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science8(2): 75–90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
