Civic education is often touted as a counterweight to the contentiousness of American politics. Yet, civic education’s relationship to dislike and distrust of opposing partisans (affective polarization) remains largely untested. Simultaneously, there are calls for educators to promote more civic informed action, taking civic education beyond the walls of the classroom. This study utilizes data from a survey of the 2016 election to examine the relationship between individuals’ recalled civic education experiences (classroom pedagogy and community service) and affective polarization. In addition, this study explores two potential moderators of the relationship between civic education and affective polarization, partisan social identity strength and age. Analysis of the sample shows a significant relationship between both types of civic education experience and affective polarization, though the nature of that relationship may depend on respondents’ partisan social identity and age.
AchenCHBartelsLM (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AlfordJRFunkCLHibbingJR (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted?American Political Science Review99(2): 153–167.
3.
AndolinaMWJenkinsKZukinC, et al. (2003) Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. Political Science and Politics36(2): 275–280.
4.
AveryPG (2002) Political socialization, tolerance, and sexual identity. Theory & Research in Social Education30(2): 190–197.
5.
AveryPGLevySASimmonsAMM (2014) Secondary students and the deliberation of public issues. PS: Political Science & Politics47(4): 849–854.
6.
BilligSRootSJesseD (2005) The impact of participation in service-learning on high school students’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 33, Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, Washington, DC.
7.
BlockJBlockJH (2006) Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality40(5): 734–749.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWE, et al. (1960) The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
CastroAJKnowlesRT (2017) Democratic citizenship education: Researching across multiple contexts and landscapes. In: ManfraMBolickC (eds) Handbook of Social Studies Research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.287–318.
11.
ClaesEHoogheM (2017) The effect of political science education on political trust and interest: Results from a 5-year panel study. Journal of Political Science Education13(1): 33–45.
12.
ClarkCH (2017) Examining the relationship between civic education and partisan alignment in young voters. Theory & Research in Social Education45(2): 218–247.
13.
ClarkCHAveryPG (2016) The psychology of controversial issues discussions: Challenges and opportunities in a polarized, post-9/11 society. In: JournellW (ed.) Reassessing the Social Studies Curriculum: Promoting Critical Civic Engagement in a Politically Polarized, Post-9/11 World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.109–120.
14.
ClarkCHSchmeichelMGarrettHJ (2021) How social studies teachers choose news resources for current events instruction. Harvard Educational Review91(1): 5–37.
15.
Commission on Youth Voting and Civic Knowledge (2013) All Together Now: Collaboration and Innovation for Youth Engagement. Medford, MA: Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
16.
ConversePE (1969) Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies2: 139–171.
17.
CrandallCSMillerJMWhiteMH (2018) Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. Presidential election: The Trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science9(2): 186–192.
18.
DennisJ (1992) Political independence in American III: In search of closet partisans. Political Behavior14(3): 261–296.
EllisCStimsonJ (2012) Ideology in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GarrettHJ (2020) Containing classroom discussions of current social and political issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies52(3): 337–355.
22.
GellerRC (2020) Teacher political disclosure in contentious times: A “responsibility to speak up” or “fair and balanced?”Theory & Research in Social Education48: 182–210.
23.
GerberASHuberGADohertyD, et al. (2010) Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review104(1): 111–133.
24.
GibsonM (2020) From deliberation to counter-narration: Toward a critical pedagogy for democratic citizenship. Theory & Research in Social Education48(3): 431–454.
25.
GreeneS (2004) Social identity theory and party identification. Social Science Quarterly85(1): 136–153.
26.
GroenendykE (2013) Competing Motive in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
GutmannAThompsonD (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
HahnCL (1996) Research on issues-centered social studies. In: EvansRWSaxeDW (eds) Handbook on Teaching Social Issues. Washington, DC: Hahn National Council for the Social Studies, pp.25–41.
29.
HaidtJ (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
30.
HessDE (2009) Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
HessDEMcAvoyPA (2014) Should teachers help students to develop partisan identities?Social Education76: 293–297.
32.
HessDEMcAvoyPA (2015) The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
HetheringtonMJWeilerJD (2009) Authoritarianism & Polarization in American Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HuddyLMasonLAarøeL (2015) Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review109(1): 1–17.
35.
IyengarSHahnKS (2009) Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication59(1): 19–39.
36.
IyengarSSoodGLelkesY (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly76(3): 405–431.
37.
IyengarSWestwoodSJ (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science59(3): 690–707.
38.
JamesJH (2009) Reframing the disclosure debate: Confronting issues of transparency in teaching controversial content. Social Studies Research and Practice4(2): 82–94.
39.
JeffersonT (1824) Letter to Edward Everett, March 27, 1824. In: LipscombAABergAE (eds) The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 16. Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, p.22. (Original work published 1903).
40.
JenningsMKMarkusGB (1984) Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study. American Political Science Review78: 1000–1018.
41.
Jewett SmithR (2020) Teaching trump: A frame analysis of educators’ responses to ‘the trump effect’ in American schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives28: 144–223.
42.
JournellW (2016) Making a case for teacher political disclosure. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing31(1): 100–111.
43.
KahneJBowyerB (2017) Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal54(1): 3–34.
44.
KahneJCrowDLeeNJ (2013) Different pedagogy, different politics: High school learning opportunities and youth political engagement. Political Psychology34(3): 419–441.
45.
KavanaghJRichMD (2018) Truth Decay. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
46.
Kawashima-GinsbergKLevineP (2014) Diversity in classrooms: The relationship between deliberative and associative opportunities in school and later electoral engagement. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy14: 394–414.
47.
KellyTE (1986) Discussing ontroversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory & Research in Social Education14(2): 113–138.
48.
KingLDavisCBrownA (2012) African American history, race, and textbooks: An examination of the works of Harold O. Rugg and Carter G. Woodson. The Journal of Social Studies Research36(4): 359–386.
49.
KingMBNewmannFMCarmichaelDL (2009) Authentic intellectual work: Common standards for teaching social studies. Social Education73(1): 43–49.
50.
KlaczynskiPA (2000) Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development71(5): 1347–1366.
51.
KlarSKrupnikovY (2016) Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
KnowlesRT (2018) Teaching who you are: Connecting teachers’ civic education ideology to instructional strategies. Theory & Research in Social Education46(1): 68–109.
53.
KnowlesRTClarkCH (2018) How common is the common good? Moving beyond idealistic notions of deliberative democracy in education. Teaching and Teacher Education71: 12–23.
LeCompteKBlevinsB (2015) Building civic bridges: Community-centered action civics. Social Studies106: 209–217.
56.
LeeCDWhiteGDongD (2021) Introduction. In: LeeCDWhiteGDongD (eds) Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp.1–21.
57.
LenzG (2012) Follow the Leader: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
58.
LevenduskyM (2009) The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
LevyBLM (2011) Fostering cautious political efficacy through civic advocacy projects: A mixed methods case study of an innovative high school class. Theory & Research in Social Education39(2): 238–277.
60.
LoJC (2017) Adolescents developing civic identities: Sociocultural perspectives on simulations and role-play in a civic classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education45(2): 189–217.
61.
LodgeMTaberC (2013) The Rationalizing Voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
LordCGRossLLepperMR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(11): 2098–2109.
63.
LupiaA (2016) Uninformed: Why People Seem to Know So Little About Politics and What We Can Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
McAvoyGE (2015) Collective Political Rationality: Partisan Thinking and Why It’s Not All Bad. New York, NY: Routledge.
65.
McAvoyPHessD (2013) Classroom deliberation in an era of political polarization. Curriculum Inquiry43(1): 14–47.
66.
McDevittM (2006) The partisan child: Developmental provocation as a model of political socialization. International Journal of Public Opinion Research18: 67–88.
67.
McDevittMKiousisS (2007) The red and blue and the defiant activist. American Behavioral Scientist50: 1214–1230.
68.
McGirrL (2015) Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
MarienS (2017) Assessing the role of television, the family, and the school in the development of political trust in adolescence. Social Science Quarterly98(3): 818–835.
NiemiRGJunnJ (1998) Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
72.
NystrandMGamoranACarbonaraW (1998) Towards an Ecology of Learning: The Case of Classroom Discourse and Its Effects on Writing in High School English and Social Studies. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
73.
Ochoa-BeckerAS (2007) Democratic Education for Social Studies: An Issues-Centered Decision-Making Curriculum, 2nd edn.Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
74.
ParkerWCHessD (2001) Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education17: 273–289.
75.
PetrocikJR (2009) Measuring party support: Leaners are not independents. Electoral Studies28(4): 562–572.
76.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49(1): 65–85.
77.
Pew Research Center (2014) Political Polarization and the American Public: How Increasing Ideological and Partisan Antipathy Affects Politics, Compromise and Everyday Life. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/ (accessed 15 January 2015).
78.
Pew Research Center (2016) Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/ (accessed 31 December 2016).
79.
RossiJA (1995) In-depth study in an issues-oriented social studies class-room. Theory & Research in Social Education23: 88–120.
80.
SandersLM (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory25(3): 347–376.
81.
SearsDO (1983) The persistence of early predispositions. In: WheelerLShaverP (eds) Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp.79–116.
82.
ShaverJP (1992) Rationales for issues-centered social studies education. Social Studies83(3): 95–99.
83.
SherifOJHarveyOJWhiteBJ, et al. (1961) Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
84.
StitzleinSM (2021) Defining and implementing civic reasoning and discourse: Philosophical and moral foundations for research and practice. In: LeeGStitzleinSMWhiteDDong (eds) Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp.1–21.
85.
StokerLJenningsMK (2008) Of time and the development of partisan polarization. American Journal of Political Science52: 619–635.
86.
TaijfelH (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American223(5): 96–102.
87.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp.33–47.
88.
Torney-PurtaJLehmannROswaldH, et al. (2001) Citizenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
89.
TwengeJMHoneycuttNPrislinR, et al. (2016) More polarized but more independent: Political party identification and ideological self-categorization among U.S. Adults, college students, and late adolescents, 1970–2015. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42(10): 1364–1383.
WadeRYarbroughD (2007) Service-learning in the social studies: Civic outcomes of the 3-12 grade CiviConnections program. Theory & Research in Social Education35(3): 366–392.
92.
WadeRCSaxeDW (1996) Community service-learning in the social studies: Historical roots, empirical evidence, critical issues. Theory & Research in Social Education24: 331–359.
93.
WestheimerJKahneJ (2004) What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal41(2): 237–269.
94.
WilenWW (2003) Conducting effective issue based discussions in social studies classrooms. International Journal of Special Education18(1): 99–111.
95.
WojcieszakMEBaekYMCarpiniMXD (2010) Deliberative and participatory democracy? Ideological strength and the processes leading from deliberation to political engagement. International Journal of Public Opinion Research22(2): 154–180.
96.
YoungIM (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
97.
YounissJYatesM (1997) Community Service and Social Responsibility in Youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
98.
ZimmermanJRobertsonE (2017) The Case for Contention: Teaching Controversial Issues in American Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
