Corporatisation of universities has drawn parallels between contemporary universities and business corporations, and extended analysis of corporate social responsibility to universities. This article reports on case study of university–community engagement with schools and school communities through youth engagement programmes to enhance democratic principles in student leadership and raise aspirations for university education for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Data from over 1200 respondents suggest that university–community engagement produced positive outcomes for individual student participants, schools and school communities and also benefited the university in terms of brand recognition and good standing in the community. This raises questions about the social responsibility of universities as agents of change to entrench society’s fundamental values of democratic participation and social justice.
AtakanSMGEkerT (2007) Corporate identity of a socially responsible university – a case from the Turkish higher education sector. Journal of Business Ethics76(1): 55–68.
2.
AttreePFrenchBMiltonB. (2011) The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidenceHealth Policy66(1), 96–105.
3.
Auckland University of Technology (AUT) (2008) Encouraging and Stimulating Innovation Fund- Application for Funding. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University and Technology.
4.
Auckland University of Technology (AUT) (2010) Encouraging and Supporting Innovation Milestone Report. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University and Technology.
5.
AxelssonHSonessonKWickenbergP (2008) Why and how do universities work for sustainability in higher education (HE)?International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education9(4): 469–478.
6.
BélangerCHAkbariFMadgettPJ (2009) Why some youths do not realise their post-secondary education aspirations. Tertiary Education and Management15(3): 209–225.
7.
BellEBrymanB (2007) Business Research Methods, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BenekeJHumanG (2010) Student recruitment marketing in South Africa – an exploratory study into the adoption of a relationship orientation. African Journal of Business Management4(4): 435–447.
BouckaertLVandenhoveJ (1998) Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics17: 1073–1081.
11.
BrennanJKingRLebeauY (2004) The Role of Universities in the Transformation of Societies. London: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information, The Open University.
12.
BrownEClokeJ (2009) Corporate social responsibility in higher education. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies8(3): 474–483.
13.
BrukardtMJHollandBPercySL. (2004) Calling the Question Is Higher Education Ready to Commit to Community Engagement?Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
CarollAB (1999) Corporate social responsibility: evolution of definitional construct. Business and Society38(3): 268–295.
16.
ChileLM (2007) Community development research. In: ChileLM (ed.) Community Development Practice in New Zealand: Exploring Good Practice. Auckland, New Zealand: Institute of Public Policy, AUT, pp. 313–328.
17.
CodlingAMeekLV (2003) The impact of the State on institutional differentiation in New Zealand. OECD Higher Education Management and Policy15(2): 83–98.
18.
De JagerJWSoontiensW (2010) Reputation and information drivers in student recruitment: comparing South African, Singaporean and Malaysian tertiary education. African Journal of Business Management4(14): 3062–3069.
19.
DenscombeM (2007) The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 3rd edn.New York: Open University Press.
20.
DenzinNK (1978) The Research Act, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
DurieM (2009) Towards social cohesion: the indigenisation of higher education in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Vice-Chancellors Forum: How far are universities changing and shaping our world, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15–19 June.
22.
ElnagarHPerryLGO’SteenB (2011) Preparing people to make a difference: transferable lessons from a first-year student leadership development programme in New Zealand. A practice report. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education2(1): 56–62.
FreemanREWicksACParmaB (2004) Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science15(3): 364–369.
25.
GunasekaraC (2006) Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. The Journal of Technology Transfer31(1): 101–113.
26.
HarkavyI (2006) The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice1(1): 5–37.
27.
HartleyMHuddlestonT (2010) School–Community–University Partnerships for a Sustainable Democracy: Education for Democratic Citizenship in Europe and the United States of America. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe Publishing.
28.
HollandBA (2001) Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged campus: six cases. Metropolitan Universities12(3): 20–29.
29.
HudsonE (2013) Educating for community change: higher education’s proposed role in community transformation through the federal promise neighborhood policy. Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement17(3): 109–138.
30.
IlventoTW (1997) Expanding the role and function of the cooperative extension system in the university setting. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review26(2): 153–165.
31.
IngleyCB (2008) Company growth and Board attitudes to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics4(1): 17–39.
32.
JacobyB (2009) Civic Engagement in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
JonesE (2002) Social responsibility activism: why individuals are changing their lifestyles to change the world. PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
37.
JongbloedBEndersJSalernoC (2008) Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education56(3): 303–324.
38.
KusumawatiAYanamandramVKPereraN (2010) University marketing and consumer behaviour concerns: the shifting preference of university selection criteria in Indonesia. Paper presented at the 2010 Asian Studies Association of Australia 18th biennial conference, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 5–8 July.
39.
LaszloC (2008) Sustainable Value: How the World’s Leading Companies Are Doing Well by Doing Good. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
LaursenSAThiryHListonCS (2012) The impact of a university-based school science outreach program on graduate student participants’ career paths and professional socialization. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement16(2): 47–78.
41.
LeachLZepkeN (2005) Student Decision-Making by Prospective Tertiary Students: A Review of Existing New Zealand and Overseas Literature. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
42.
LedicJCulumBNuzdicS. (2008) What role do Croatian higher institution play? A study on University Civic Mission. In: Proceedings of the 4th international Barcelona conference on higher education, Vol. 8. Higher education and citizenship, participation and democracy. Technical University of Catalonia in March-April 2008. Available at: http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099/5702
43.
MaringeF (2006) University and course choice: implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management20(6): 466–479.
44.
MarkováI (2008) Chapter 14. Dialogical perspective of social representations of responsibility. In: SugimanTGergenKWagnerW. (eds) Meaning in Action: Constructions, Narratives and Representations. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, pp. 253–270.
45.
MartinJL (1993) The university as agent of social transformation: the postmodern argument considered. Academic Questions6(3): 55–72.
MitchellRKAgleBR (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review22(4): 853–886.
48.
NagyJRobbA (2008) Can universities be good corporate citizens?Critical Perspectives on Accounting19(8): 1414–1430.
49.
NejatiMShafaeiASalamzadehY. (2011) Corporate social responsibility and universities: a study of top 10 world universities’ websites. African Journal of Business Management5(2): 440–447.
50.
NewsonJ (1998) The corporate-linked university: from social project to market force. Canadian Journal of Communication23(1): 107–124.
NwankwoEPhillipsNTraceyP (2007) Social investment through community enterprise: the case of multinational corporations involvement in the development of Nigerian water resources. Journal of Business Ethics73(1): 91–102.
53.
O’ConnorN (2009) Hispanic origin, socio-economic status, and community college enrolment. The Journal of Higher Education80(2): 121–145.
54.
OstranderSA (2004) Democracy, civic participation, and the university: a comparative study of civic engagement on five campuses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(1): 74–93.
55.
PaulCJMSiegelDS (2006) Corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis26(3): 207–211.
56.
PearceJPearsonM (2007) The Ivory Tower and beyond: Bradford University at the heart of its communities. Bradford University’s REAP approach to measuring its Community Engagement. Report, University of Bradford, Bradford, 19February.
57.
PowerC (2005) Quo vadis? Education for what purpose?Social Alternatives24(4): 13–18.
58.
SarantakosS (2005) Social Research, 3rd edn.Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Macmillan Education.
59.
SeitanidiMMRyanA (2007) A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: from philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing12(3): 247–267.
60.
SmithJ (1998) Recruitment: student outreach strategies. In: HendersonS (ed.) Handbook for the College Admissions Profession. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing, pp. 127–141.
61.
StoeckerR (2012) Research Methods for Community Change: A Project-Based Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
63.
The Association for Community and Higher Education Partnerships (ANCHEP) (2013) University of Memphis. Available at: http://www.memphis.edu/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
64.
The International Consortium (2014) The International Consortium for Higher Education Civic Responsibility, and Democracy. Available at: https://www.internationalconsortium.org/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
ThompsonMSHeadRRikardRV. (2012) University-community partnerships: bridging people and cultures in an HIV/AIDS health intervention in an African American Community. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement16(2): 79–106.
67.
TiebenNWolbersM (2010) Transitions to post-secondary and tertiary education in the Netherlands: a trend analysis of unconditional and conditional socio-economic background effects. Higher Education60(1): 85–100.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (1998) World declaration on higher education for the twenty-first century, for vision and action. In: World conference on higher education, Paris, 9 October.
70.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2009) The new dynamics of higher education and research, for societal change and development. In: Communique world conference on higher education, Paris, 5–8 July.
71.
VaughanKRobertsJ (2007) Developing a ‘productive’ account of young people’s transition perspectives. Journal of Education & Work20(2): 91–105.
72.
WeertsDJSandmannLR (2008) Building a two-way street: challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education32(1): 73–106.
73.
WhitehouseL (2006) Corporate social responsibility: views from the frontline. Journal of Business Ethics63(3): 279–296.
74.
WieseMvan HeerdenNJordaanY. (2009) A marketing perspective on choice factors considered by South African first-year students in selecting a higher education institution. Southern African Business Review13(1): 39–60.
75.
WilsonDMcKinlayPvon TunzelmannA. (2006) Business Social Investment Activity in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: AUT University.
76.
WimpennyPGassJ (2000) Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?Journal of Advanced Nursing31(6): 1485–1492.
77.
WoodDJJonesRE (1995) Stakeholder mismatching: a theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis3(3): 229–267.
78.
WrightSHornblowA (2008) Emerging needs, evolving services: the health of Pacific peoples in New Zealand. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online3(1): 21–33.
