Incomes Data Services, ‘Assessment Centres’, IDS Study 735, September 2002.
2.
WinfredA., DayE.A., McNellyT.L., and EdensP.S.‘A Meta-Analysis of the Criterion-Related Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2003, pp. 125–155.
3.
CraikK.H., WareA.P., StawB., ZedeckS., KampJ., and O'ReillyC.III‘Explorations of Construct Validity in a Combined Managerial and Personality Assessment Programme’.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 2, 2002, pp. 171–194.
4.
WoehrD.J., and WinfredA.‘The Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Methodological Factors’, Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2003, pp. 231–258.
5.
HaalandS., and ChristiansenN.D.‘Implications of Trait Activation Theory for Evaluating the Construct Validity of Assessment Center Ratings’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 55, 2002, pp. 137–163.
6.
SchleicherD.J., DayD.V., MayesB.T., and RiggioR.E.‘A New Frame for Frame-of-Reference Training: Enhancing the Construct Validity of Assessment Centers’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 4, 2002, pp. 735–746.
7.
LievensF.‘Trying to Understand the Different Pieces of the Construct Validity Puzzle of Assessment Centres: An Examination of Assessor and Assessee Effects’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2002, pp. 675–686.