Meta-analyses have consistently demonstrated the robustness of the cross-race effect (CRE; i.e., better recognition of same-race faces compared with different-race faces). These analyses have unveiled variations in the dependent variables associated with the CRE across combinations of participant and target races. However, the underlying factors driving these variations remain poorly understood. We posit that although the CRE is robust, its generalizability may be contingent on the specific racial groups compared, particularly when contrasting majority and minority racial groups. In this article, we delve into the dynamics of the CRE across distinct racial groups and explore how minority-race status may influence research outcomes. We considered the articles included in the latest meta-analyses of the CRE with a spotlight on minority-race status. We suggest that minority-race status may explain why many studies considering non-White participants do not show a CRE. The CRE might not be as robust as it appears to be because much of the research on the effect has focused on majority-race participants and minority-race faces. Going forward, researchers should consider incorporating measures relevant to the minority effect, fully crossing participant and target races and studying a greater variety of races.
Amuedo-DorantesC.BansakC.PozoS. (2021). Refugee admissions and public safety: Are refugee settlement areas more prone to crime?International Migration Review, 55(1), 135–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320920192
2.
AnthonyT.CopperC.MullenB. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183005
3.
AnzuresG.KellyD. J.PascalisO.QuinnP. C.SlaterA. M.de ViviésX.LeeK. (2014). Own- and other-race face identity recognition in children: The effects of pose and feature composition. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033166
4.
BernsteinM. J.YoungS. G.HugenbergK. (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18(8), 706–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
5.
BothwellR. K.BrighamJ. C.MalpassR. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289151002
6.
BrighamJ. C.MalpassR. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own-and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01133.x
7.
BurgundE. D. (2021). Looking at the own-race bias: Eye-tracking investigations of memory for different race faces. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1858216
8.
Castro TorresA. F.Alburez-GutierrezD. (2022). North and South: Naming practices and the hidden dimension of global disparities in knowledge production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 119(10), Article e2119373119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119373119
9.
CavazosJ. G.NoyesE.O’TooleA. J. (2019). Learning context and the other-race effect: Strategies for improving face recognition. Vision Research, 157, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.03.003
10.
ChiroroP.ValentineT. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(4), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401421
11.
ChiroroP. M.TredouxC. G.RadaelliS.MeissnerC. A. (2008). Recognizing faces across continents: The effect of within-race variations on the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1089
12.
CorrellJ.LemoineC.MaD. (2011). Hemispheric asymmetry in cross-race face recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1162–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.001
13.
CrossJ. F.CrossJ.DalyJ. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10(6), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210319
14.
CrutchfieldR. D.FernandesA.MartinezJ. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparity and criminal justice: How much is too much?The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 100(3), 903–932. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25766112
15.
CruzF.PalmaT. A.BansemerE.CorrellJ.FonsecaS.GonçalvesP.SantosA. S. (2023). Do individuation instructions reduce the cross-race effect? A registered replication of Hugenberg, Miller, and Claypool (2007). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 104, Article 104423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104423
16.
De HeeringA.De LiedekerkeC.DeboniM.RossionB. (2010). The role of experience during childhood in shaping the other-race effect. Developmental Science, 13(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00876.x
17.
DehonH.BrédartS. (2001). An ‘other-race’ effect in age estimation from faces. Perception, 30(9), 1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3122
18.
DodsonC. S.DobolyiD. G. (2016). Confidence and eyewitness identifications: The cross-race effect, decision time and accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3178
19.
DotyN. D. (1998). The influence of nationality on the accuracy of face and voice recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 111(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423486
20.
EllemersN.HaslamS. A. (2012). Social identity theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 379–398). Sage.
21.
EllisH. D.DeregowskiJ. B.ShepherdJ. W. (1975). Descriptions of white and black faces by white and black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207597508247325
FaisonL.SmalarzL.MadonS.ClowK. A. (2023). The stigma of wrongful conviction differs for White and Black exonerees. Law and Human Behavior, 47(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000522
24.
FeinmanS.EntwisleD. R. (1976). Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces. Child Development, 47, 506–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128809
25.
FergusonK. T.KulkofskyS.CashonC. H.CasasolaM. (2009). The development of specialized processing of own-race faces in infancy. Infancy, 14(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000902839369
26.
Fioravanti-BastosA. C. M.FilgueirasA.Landeira-FernandezJ. (2014). The other-race effect in Caucasian and Japanese-descendant children in Brazil: Evidence of developmental plasticity. Psychology, 5(19), 2073–2083. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.519210
27.
GierV. S.KreinerD. S.LampinenJ. M. (2016). Factors affecting recognition of senior citizens in a silver alert. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9210-0
28.
GolbyA. J.GabrieliJ. D.ChiaoJ. Y.EberhardtJ. L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4(8), 845–850. https://doi.org/10.1038/90565
29.
GrossT. F. (2009). Own-ethnicity bias in the recognition of Black, East Asian, Hispanic, and White faces. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530902880381
30.
HavardC.BreeseE.ThirkettleM.KaskK.LeolK. L.MädamürkK. (2023). A background of bias: Subtle changes in lineup backgrounds increase the own race bias. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-023-09578-2
31.
HavardC.MemonA.HumphriesJ. E. (2017). The own-race bias in child and adolescent witnesses: Evidence from video line-ups. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 19(4), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355717731579
32.
HilliarK. F. (2011). Why do they all look the same to me? Understanding the contributions of perceptual-expertise and social-categorisation mechanisms in driving the own-race bias using four methodologies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. UNSW Sydney.
33.
HillsP. J.LewisM. B. (2006). Short article: Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600654750
34.
HinzmanL.LloydE. P.MaddoxK. B. (2022). The stigmatized perceiver: Exploring the implications of social stigma for cross-race face processing and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(2), Article e12654. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12654
35.
HippJ. R. (2010). A dynamic view of neighborhoods: The reciprocal relationship between crime and neighborhood structural characteristics. Social Problems, 57(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.2.205
36.
HoM. R.PezdekK. (2016). Postencoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0945-x
HugenbergK.MillerJ.ClaypoolH. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.010
39.
HugenbergK.SaccoD. F. (2008). Social categorization and stereotyping: How social categorization biases person perception and face memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00090.x
40.
HugenbergK.YoungS. G.BernsteinM. J.SaccoD. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1168–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020463
41.
JackiwL. B.ArbuthnottK.PfeiferJ.MarconJ. L.MeissnerC. A. (2008). Examining the cross-race effect in lineup identification using Caucasian and First Nations samples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.40.1.52
42.
JohnsM.SchmaderT.MartensA. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x
43.
JosephJ. J.MotleyS.CelikY.CintronM. (2022). Racial socialization: The development of perceptions about law enforcement among minority college students. SN Social Sciences, 2, Article 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00561-y
44.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
45.
JostJ. T.FitzsimonsG.KayA. C.GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. (2004). The ideological animal. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263–283). Guilford Press.
46.
KatzmanJ.KoveraM. B. (2023). Potential causes of racial disparities in wrongful convictions based on mistaken identifications: Own-race bias and differences in evidence-based suspicion. Law and Human Behavior, 47(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000503
47.
LampinenJ. M.RoushA.EricksonW. B.MooreK. N.RaceB. (2015). The effects of simulated distance on recognition of same race and other race faces. Visual Cognition, 23(6), 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1084071
48.
LeeJ.PenrodS. D. (2022). Three-level meta-analysis of the other-race bias in facial identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(5), 1106–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3997
49.
LevinD. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
50.
LindsayR. C.WellsG. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 556–564.
51.
LuceT. S. (1974). The role of experience in inter-racial recognition. Proceedings of the Division of Personality and Society Psychology, 1(1), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727400100114
MacLinO. H.MalpassR. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 98–118.
54.
MarshB. U.PezdekK.OzeryD. H. (2016). The cross-race effect in face recognition memory by bicultural individuals. Acta Psychologica, 169, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.003
55.
MarshB. U.SassL.DysonN.ParkG. (2023). The cross-race effect is mitigated by own-gender bias but not minimal groups or university affiliation. Visual Cognition, 31(10), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2024.2343160
56.
McKoneE.WanL.PidcockM.CrookesK.ReynoldsK. J.DawelA.KiddE.FiorentiniC. (2019). A critical period for faces: Other-race face recognition is improved by childhood but not adult social contact. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 12820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49202-0
57.
McKoneE.DawelA.RobbinsR. A.ShouY.ChenN.CrookesK. (2023). Why the other-race effect matters: Poor recognition of other-race faces impacts everyday social interactions. British Journal of Psychology, 114, 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12508
58.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
59.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C.ButzD. A. (2005). Memory for own-and other-race faces: A dual-process approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1097
NgW.LindsayR. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022194252004
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1718–1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205278261
O’TooleA. J.DeffenbacherK. A.ValentineD.AladiH. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other race effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 208–224. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208892
66.
PenningtonC. R.HeimD.LevyA. R.LarkinD. T. (2016). Twenty years of stereotype threat research: A review of psychological mediators. PLOS ONE, 11(1), Article e0146487. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146487
67.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
68.
PezdekK.StolzenbergS. (2014). Are individuals’ familiarity judgments diagnostic of prior contact?Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.772181
69.
PhinneyJ. S.ChaviraV. (1995). Parental ethnic socialization and adolescent coping with problems related to ethnicity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(1), 31–53.
70.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
71.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.
72.
RhodesG.EwingL.HaywardW. G.MaurerD.MondlochC. J.TanakaJ. W. (2009). Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. British Journal of Psychology, 100(4), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X396503
73.
RhodesG.LieH. C.EwingL.EvangelistaE.TanakaJ. W. (2010). Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017680
74.
SangrigoliS.PallierC.ArgentiA. M.VentureyraV. A. G.de SchonenS. (2005). Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science, 16(6), 440–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01554.x
75.
ScheckB.NeufeldP.DwyerJ. (2003). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New American Library.
76.
ShriverE. R.YoungS. G.HugenbergK.BernsteinM. J.LanterJ. R. (2008). Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310455
77.
SidaniusJ.LiuJ. H.ShawJ. S.PrattoF. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 338–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x
78.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2). Sage.
79.
SimonB.AufderheideB.KampmeierC. (2003). The social psychology of minority-majority relations. In BrownR.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 303–323). Blackwell Publishing.
80.
SimonD.ChenJ. M.ShermanJ. W.CalanchiniJ. (2023). A recognition advantage for members of higher-status racial groups. British Journal of Psychology, 114, 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12587
81.
SinghB.MellingerC.EarlsH. A.TranJ.BardsleyB.CorrellJ. (2021). Does cross-race contact improve cross-race face perception? A meta-analysis of the cross-race deficit and contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(6), 865–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211024463
82.
SporerS. L. (1999, July). The own-race bias in Germany: Testing the contact hypothesis with Turks and Germans [Paper presentation]. Fourth European Conference on Psychology and Law of the American Psychology–Law Association and the European Psychology–Law Association, Dublin, Ireland.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
85.
StelterM.SimonD.CalanchiniJ.ChristO.DegnerJ. (2023). Real-life outgroup exposure, self-reported outgroup contact and the other-race effect. British Journal of Psychology, 114, 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12600
86.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole.
87.
TanC. B.StephenI. D.WhiteheadR.SheppardE. (2012). You look familiar: How Malaysian Chinese recognize faces. PLOS ONE, 7(1), Article e29714. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029714
88.
TanakaJ. W.KieferM.BukachC. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93(1), B1–B9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
89.
ThamD. S. Y.BremnerJ. G.HayD. (2017). The other-race effect in children from a multiracial population: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.006
90.
TörediD.MansourJ. K.JonesS. E.SkeltonF.McIntyreA. (in press). Creating a cross-race effect inventory to postdict eyewitness accuracy. Law and Human Behaviour.
91.
UskulA. K.ThalmayerA. G.BernardoA. B.GonzálezR.KendeA.LaherS.. . . CooperM. L. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for psychological research in the majority world. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.123703
92.
Vingilis-JaremkoL.KawakamiK.FriesenJ. P. (2020). Other-groups bias effects: Recognizing majority and minority outgroup faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 908–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620919562
93.
VredeveldtA.TredouxC. G.KempenK.NortjeA. (2015). Eye remember what happened: Eye-closure improves recall of events but not face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3092
94.
WalkerP. M.HewstoneM. (2006). A perceptual discrimination investigation of the own-race effect and intergroup experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1191
95.
WalkerP. M.HewstoneM. (2008). The influence of social factors and implicit racial bias on a generalized own-race effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1382
96.
WalkerP. M.TanakaJ. W. (2003). An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception, 32(9), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5098
97.
WanL.CrookesK.ReynoldsK. J.IronsJ. L.McKoneE. (2015). A cultural setting where the other-race effect on face recognition has no social-motivational component and derives entirely from lifetime perceptual experience. Cognition, 144, 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.011
98.
WellsG. L.OlsonE. S. (2001). The other-race effect in eyewitness identification: What do we do about it?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7(1), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.230
99.
WengerM. R. (2019). Clarifying the relationship between racial diversity and crime: Neighborhoods versus cities. Crime & Delinquency, 65(11), 1513–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718768726
YoungS. L.HugenbergK.BernsteinM. S.SaccoD. F. (2012). Perception and motivation in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418987
102.
ZhouG.ElshiekhA.MoulsonM. C. (2019). Lifetime perceptual experience shapes face memory for own- and other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 27(9–10), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1638478
103.
ZigerellL. J. (2017). Potential publication bias in the stereotype threat literature: Comment on Nguyen and Ryan (2008). Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(8), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000188
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
