HommelB. (2020). Pseudo-mechanistic explanations in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12, 1294–1305.
2.
HommelB. (2024). Dealing with diversity in psychology: Science or ideology?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(3), 558–563.
3.
HommelB.ColzatoL. S. (2017). The grand challenge: Integrating nomothetic and ideographic approaches to human cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00100
4.
JussimL. (2024). Diversity is diverse: Social justice reparations and science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(3), 564–575.
5.
LewinK. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–176.
6.
LuhmannN. (1996). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
7.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
8.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709
9.
SowellT. (2019). Discrimination and disparities. Basic Books.
10.
StanovichK. E. (2024). Toward a psychology of ideas rather than demographics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(3), 580–584.
11.
StroebeW. (2024). The myth of the need for diversity among subjects in theory-testing research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(3), 576–579.
