In the United States, White samples are often portrayed as if their racial identities were inconsequential to their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and research findings derived from White samples are often portrayed as if they were generalizable to all humans. We argue that these and other practices are rooted in a “White = neutral” framework (i.e., the conceptualization of White samples as nonracial). First, we review existing data and present some new data to highlight the scope of the White = neutral framework. Second, we integrate research from across psychological science to argue that the continued use of the White = neutral framework will prevent psychology from becoming a truly objective and inclusive science for at least three reasons: (a) Research with White samples will be valued over research with samples of color, (b) norms that maintain White neutrality will remain unchallenged, and (c) the role of White identity in psychological processes will remain underspecified and underexamined. Third, we provide recommendations for how to move beyond the White = neutral framework in hopes of encouraging all psychological scientists to move toward a White ≠ neutral framework in which all samples are identified for the unique and diverse perspectives that they bring to the world.
AnyiwoN.BañalesJ.RowleyS. J.WatkinsD. C.Richards-SchusterK. (2018). Sociocultural influences on the sociopolitical development of African American youth. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12276
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.PaukerK.AmbadyN.SommersS. R.NortonM. I. (2008). Learning (not) to talk about race: When older children underperform in social categorization. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012835
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
4.
BañalesJ.MarchandA. X.SkinnerO. D.AnyiwoN.RowleyS. J.Kurtz-CostesB. (2019). Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(S2), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.111/jora.12485
BonawitzE.ShaftoP.GweonH.GoodmanN. D.SpelkeE.SchulzL. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120, 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001
7.
BuchananN. T.PerezM.PrinsteinM. J.ThurstonI. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science. Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. American Psychologist, 76, 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000905
8.
CheonN. K.MelaniI.HongY. (2020). How USA-centric is psychology? An archival study of implicit assumptions of generalizability of findings to human nature based on origins of study samples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620927269
9.
ClancyK. B. H.DavisJ. L. (2019). Soylent is people, and WEIRD is white: Biological anthropology, whiteness, and the limits of the WEIRD. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48, 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011133
10.
CookC.GoodmanN. D.SchulzL. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.03.003
11.
DeJesusJ. M.CallananM. A.SolisG.GelmanS. A. (2019). Generic language in scientific communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116, 18370–18377. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817706116
DupreeC. H.KrausM. W. (2021). Psychological Science is not Race Neutral. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17, 270–275. https://10.1177/1745691620979820
14.
FanonF. (1961). The wretched of the earth. Grove/Atlantic.
15.
FrankenburgR. (2003). Growing up white: Feminism, racism, and the social geography of childhood. Feminist Review, 45(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1993.38
16.
GrahamS. (1992). “Most of the subjects were White and middle class”: Trends in published research on African Americans in selected APA journals, 1970–1989. American Psychologist, 47, 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.5.629
17.
GuthrieR. V. (2004). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology. Pearson Education.
18.
HardimanR.KeehnM. (2012). White identity revisited: Listening to white students. In WijeyesingheC.JacksonB.III (Eds.), New perspectives on racial identity development: Integrating emerging frameworks (pp. 121–137). New York University Press.
19.
HartmannW. E.KimE. S.KimJ. H. J.NguyenT. U.WendtD. C.NagataD. K.GoneJ. P. (2013). In search of cultural diversity, revisited: Recent publication trends in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032260
20.
HelmsJ. E. (1990). Black and White racial identity: Theory, research, and practice. Greenwood Press.
21.
HelmsJ. (2014). Toward a model of White racial identity development. In AltbachP. G.ArnoldK.KingI. C. (Eds.), College Student Development and Academic Life: Psychological, Intellectual, Social and Moral Issues (pp. 207–224). Routledge.
22.
HelmsJ. E. (2017). The challenge of making whiteness visible: Reactions to four whiteness articles. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(5), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000017718943
23.
HelmsJ. E. (2020). A race is a nice thing to have: A guide to being a White person or understanding the White persons in your life. Cognella Academic.
24.
HenrichJ. P. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
25.
HorowitzA. C.FrankM. C. (2016). Children’s pragmatic inferences as a route for learning about the world. Child Development, 87(3), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12527
26.
HughesD.RodriquezJ.SmithE. P.JohnsonD. J.StevensonH. C.SpicerP. (2006). Parents’ ethnic-racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747
27.
HumeD. (1740). A treatise of human nature. (NortonD. F.NortonM. J., Eds.; pp. 1738–2000). Oxford University Press.
28.
HuntM. O. (1996). The individual, society, or both? A comparison of Black, Latino, and White beliefs about the causes of poverty. Social Forces, 75(1), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580766
29.
JacksonJ. C.HesterN.GrayK. (2018). The faces of God in America: Revealing religious diversity across people and politics. PLOS ONE, 13, Article e0198745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198745
30.
JonesJ. M. (1983). The concept and usage of race in social psychology. In WheelerL.ShaverP. (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 117–150). Sage.
31.
JonesJ. M. (2010). I’m White and you’re not: The value of unraveling ethnocentric science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388771
32.
KanazawaS. (2020). What do we do with the WEIRD problem?Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 342–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000222
KteilyN.Bruneau WaytzA.CotterillS. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048
35.
LeslieS.-J. (2007). Generics and the structure of the mind. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 375–403.
36.
Maldonado-TorresN. (2017). Frantz Fanon and the decolonial turn in psychology: From moden/colonial methods to the decolonial attitude. South African Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317737918
37.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Culture and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
38.
MeadonM.SpurettD. (2010). It’s not just the subjects-there are too many WEIRD researchers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 104–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000208
39.
MedinD. L. (2017). Psychological Science as a complex system: Report card. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616687746
40.
NeblettE. W.PhilipC. L.CogburnC. D.SellersR. M. (2006). African American adolescents’ discrimination experiences and academic achievement: Racial socialization as a cultural compensatory and protective factor. Journal of Black Psychology, 32(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798406287072
41.
NzingaK.RappD. N.LeatherwoodC.EasterdayM.RogersL. O.GallagherN.MedinD. L. (2018). Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 45, 11435–11441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721167115
42.
PhillipsL. T.LoweryB. S. (2015). The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/jesp.2015.06.008
43.
PhillipsL. T.LoweryB. S. (2018). Herd invisibility: The psychology of racial privilege. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417753600
44.
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology of homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115
45.
RiggsD. W. (2004). Challenging the monoculturalism of psychology: Towards a more socially accountable pedagogy and practice. Australian Psychologist, 39(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001701834
46.
RizzoM. T.KillenM. (2018). How social status influences our understanding of others’ mental states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 169, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.008
47.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709
48.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.WangM. (2021). The souls of Black folk (and the weight of Black ancestry) in U.S. Black Americans’ racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000228
49.
RobertsS. O.RizzoM. T. (2021). The psychology of American racism. American Psychologist, 76(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000642
50.
RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A. (2016). Can White children grow up to be Black? Children’s reasoning about the stability of emotion and race. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000132
51.
RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A.HoA. K. (2017). So it is, so it shall be: Descriptive regularities license children’s prescriptive judgments. Cognitive Science, 41, 576–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12443
52.
RobertsS. O.GuoC.HoA. K.GelmanS. A. (2018). Children’s descriptive-to-prescriptive tendency replicates (and varies) cross-culturally: Evidence from China. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 165, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/jecp.2017.03.018
53.
RobertsS. O.RizzoM. T. (2021). The psychology of American racism. American Psychologist, 76(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000642
54.
RoismanG. I. (2021). Editorial: A vision of a fair and efficient, diverse and inclusive, cumulative science of child development in the best and worst of times. Child Development, 92(2), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.111/cdev.13538
55.
RowleyS. J.CamachoT. C. (2015). Increasing diversity in cognitive developmental research: Issues and solutions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2014.976224
56.
SalterP. S.AdamsG.PerezM. J. (2018). Racism in the structure of everyday worlds: A cultural-psychological perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417724239
57.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
58.
SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
59.
SueD. W. (2004). Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: Making the “invisible” visible. American Psychologist, 59(8), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.761
60.
SullivanJ. N.EberhardtJ. L.RobertsS. O. (2021). Conversations about race in Black and White US families: Before and after George Floyd’s death. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 118(38), Article e2106366118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106366188
61.
TalhelmT. (2020). Emerging evidence of cultural differences linked to rice versus wheat agriculture. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.031
62.
TalhelmT.EnglishA. S. (2020). Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(33), 19816–19824. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909909117
63.
ThalmayerA. G.ToscanelliC.ArnettJ. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129.
64.
TermanL. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale. Houghton Mifflin.
65.
van DijkD.ManorO.CareyL. B. (2014). Publication metrics and success on the academic job market. Current Biology, 24(11), R516–R517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.039
66.
WangQ. (2016). Why should we all be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616645552
WinstonA. S. (2010). Why mainstream research will not end scientific racism in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320925176
69.
ZhouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
