We examined the wrecked-by-success hypothesis. Initially formalized by Sigmund Freud, this hypothesis has become pervasive throughout the humanities, popular press, and modern scientific literature. The hypothesis implies that truly outstanding occupational success often exacts a heavy toll on psychological, interpersonal, and physical well-being. Study 1 tested this hypothesis in three cohorts of 1,826 high-potential, intellectually gifted individuals. Participants with exceptionally successful careers were compared with those of their gender-equivalent intellectual peers with more typical careers on well-known measures of psychological well-being, flourishing, core self-evaluations, and medical maladies. Family relationships, comfort with aging, and life satisfaction were also assessed. Across all three cohorts, those deemed occupationally outstanding individuals were similar to or healthier than their intellectual peers across these metrics. Study 2 served as a constructive replication of Study 1 but used a different high-potential sample: 496 elite science/technology/engineering/mathematics (STEM) doctoral students identified in 1992 and longitudinally tracked for 25 years. Study 2 replicated the findings from Study 1 in all important respects. Both studies found that exceptionally successful careers were not associated with medical frailty, psychological maladjustment, and compromised interpersonal and family relationships; if anything, overall, people with exceptionally successful careers were medically and psychologically better off.
AC/DC. (1975). It’s a long way to the top (if you wanna rock ‘n’ roll) [Song]. On T.N.T. Albert Studios.
4.
AchterJ. A.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (1996). Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: “It was never there and already it’s vanishing.”Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.65
AroraM. (2013). From the rat race to financial freedom: A common man’s journey. Jaico Publishing House.
9.
AuclairP. (2012). Thierry Henry: Lonely at the top. Macmillan.
10.
BadianE. (1962). Alexander the Great and the loneliness of power. Blackwell Publishing.
11.
BakerJ. H. (2004). James Buchanan. Times Books.
12.
BaldwinJ. (1905). Thirty more famous stories retold. American Book Company.
13.
BartoloméF.EvansP. A. (1980). Must success cost so much?Harvard Business Review, 58, 137–148.
14.
BaruchY.BozionelosN. (2010). Career issues. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, volume 2:Selecting and developing members of the organization (pp. 67–113). American Psychological Association.
15.
BeckC. (2017). Nine to five escape plan: How to escape the rat race. Craig Beck Media Limited.
16.
BelskyJ.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.PoultonR. (2020). The origins of you: How childhood shapes later life. Harvard University Press.
17.
BenbowC. P.LubinskiD.SheaD. L.Eftekhari-SanjaniH. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00291
18.
BerglasS. (1986). The success syndrome: Hitting bottom when you reach the top. Springer.
19.
BernsteinB. O. (2021). Gender-differentiating effects of parenthood on income among high-potential individuals in the context of other valued aspects of life [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Vanderbilt University.
20.
BernsteinB. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2019). Psychological constellations assessed at age 13 predict distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Psychological Science, 30(3), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618822524
21.
BernsteinB. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2021). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 830–845. http://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000500
22.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995
23.
BlumH. P. (2009). Van Gogh’s fantasies of replacement: Being a double and a twin. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57(6), 1311–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065109357344
24.
BurksB. S.JensenD. W.TermanL. M. (1930). Genetic studies of genius.Vol 3: The promise of youth: Follow-up studies of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.
CronbachL. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Intelligence: Measurement, theory and public policy (pp. 147–171). University of Illinois.
33.
DawesR. M.MeehlP. E. (1966). Mixed group validation: A method for determining the validity of diagnostic signs without using criterion groups. Psychological Bulletin, 66(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023584
34.
de MijollaA. (Ed.). (2005). International dictionary of psychoanalysis (Vols. 1–3). Thomson Gale.
DearyI. J.HarrisS. E.HillW. D. (2009). What genome-wide association studies reveal about the association between intelligence and physical health, illness, and mortality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 27, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.005
DearyI. J.WhalleyL. J.StarrJ. M. (2009). A lifetime of intelligence: Follow-up studies of the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. American Psychological Association.
40.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
DienerE. D.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD. W.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
43.
EdwardsK. (2011). 30 something and over it: What happens when you wake up and don’t want to go to work . . . ever again. Random House.
44.
EpsteinD. (2011). The sports gene: Inside the science of extraordinary athletic performance. Current.
45.
EysenckH. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
FreudS. (1941). A disturbance of memory on the Acropolis: An open letter to Romain Rolland on the occasion of his seventieth birthday (1936). International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 22, 93–101. (Original work published 1937).
48.
FreudS. (1957). Some character types met with in psycho-analytic work. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 309–333). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1916)
49.
FriedmanH. S.MartinL. M. (2011). The longevity project: Surprising discoveries for health and long life from the landmark eight decade study. Hudson Street Press.
50.
GardnerH. (1993). Creating minds. Basic Books.
51.
GarryJ. (2017). Archetypes and motifs in folklore and literature: A handbook. Routledge.
52.
GearyD. C. (2018). Efficiency of mitochondrial functioning as the fundamental biological mechanism of general intelligence (g). Psychological Review, 125(6), 1028–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000124
53.
GearyD. C. (2019). The spark of life and the unification of intelligence, health, and aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419829719
54.
GilliganV.JohnsonM.McLarenM. (Executive Producers). (2008–2013). Breaking bad [TV series]. High Bridge Entertainment; Gran Via Productions; Sony Pictures Television.
GottfredsonL. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703011002001
58.
GottfredsonL. S. (2004). Intelligence: Is it the epidemiologists’ elusive “fundamental cause” of social class inequalities in health?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174
HagenaarsS. P.HarrisS. E.DaviesG.HillW. D.LiewaldD. C. M.RitchieS. J.MarioniR. E.Fawns-RitchieC.CullenB.MalikR., METASTROKE Consortium, International Consortium for Blood Pressure GWAS, SpiroMeta Consortium, CHARGE Consortium Pulmonary Group, CHARGE Consortium Aging and Longevity Group, WorrallB. B.SudlowC. J. M.WardlawJ. M.GallacherJ.. . . DearyI. J. (2016). Shared genetic aetiology between cognitive functions and physical and mental health in UK Biobank (N = 112,151) and 24 GWAS consortia. Molecular Psychiatry, 21, 1624–1632. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.225
63.
HallJ. (1974). Dictionary of subjects and symbols in art. Harper & Row.
64.
HillW. D.HarrisS. E.DearyI. J. (2019). What genome-wide association studies reveal about the association between intelligence and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 27, 25–30.
65.
HochschildJ. L. (1996). Facing up to the American dream: Race, class, and the soul of the nation. Princeton University Press.
66.
HolahanC. K.SearsR. R.CronbachL. J. (1995). The gifted group in later maturity. Stanford University Press.
67.
HulinC. L.HumphreysL. G. (1980). Foundations of test theory. In WilliamsE. G. (Ed.), Construct validity in psychological measurement (pp. 5–12). Educational Testing Service.
68.
HumphreysL. G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17(7), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041550
69.
HumphreysL. G. (1985). General intelligence: An integration of factor, test, and simplex theory. In WolmanB. B. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 201–224). John Wiley & Sons.
JudgeT. A.HigginsC. A.ThoresenC. J.BarrickM. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x
75.
JudgeT. A.Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D. (2012). On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028084
76.
JudgeT. A.KlingerR. L.SimonL. S. (2010). Time is on my side: Time, general mental ability, human capital, and extrinsic career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017594
77.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
KawabataM. (2007). Virtuosity, the violin, the devil . . . what really made Paganini “demonic?”Current Musicology, 83, 85–109. https://doi.org/10.7916/cm.v0i83.5088
81.
KeatingD. P.StanleyJ. C. (1972). Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 1(9), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X001009003
82.
KeatsE. J. (1965). John Henry, an American legend. Pantheon Books.
LakensD.AdolfiF. G.AlbersC. J.AnvariF.AppsM. A. J.ArgamonS. E.BaguleyT.BeckerR. B.BenningS. D.BradfordD. E.BuchananE. M.CaldwellA. R.Van CalsterB.CarlssonR.ChenS.-C.ChungB.CollingL. J.CollinsG. S.CrookZ.. . . ZwaanR. A. (2018). Justify your alpha. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(3), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x
89.
LaplancheJ.PontalisJ. B. (1973). The language of psychoanalysis (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Karnac Books.
90.
LeeS.DitkoS. (1962). Spider-man!Amazing Fantasy [Comic book], 1(15), 1–11. Marvel Comics.
91.
LefkowitzM. R. (1959). Pyrrhus’ negotiations with the Romans, 280–278 BC. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 64, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/310940
92.
LeuchtenburgW. E. (2015). The American president: From Teddy Roosevelt to Bill Clinton. Oxford University Press.
93.
LevyS. T.SeeligB. J.InderbitzinL. B. (1995). On those wrecked by success: A clinical inquiry. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64(4), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1995.11927468
LubinskiD. (2009). Cognitive epidemiology: With emphasis on untangling cognitive ability and socioeconomic status. Intelligence, 37, 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.09.001
96.
LubinskiD. (2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
99.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2021). Intellectual precocity: What have we learned since Terman?Gifted Child Quarterly, 65, 3–28.
100.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.KellH. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2217–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551371
101.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.SheaD. L.Eftekhari-SanjaniH.HalvorsonM. B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12(4), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00357
102.
LubinskiD.HumphreysL. G. (1992). Some bodily and medical correlates of mathematical giftedness and commensurate levels of socioeconomic status. Intelligence, 16(4), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(92)90027-O
103.
LubinskiD.HumphreysL. G. (1997). Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences. Intelligence, 24(1), 159–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90016-7
104.
LykkenD. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70(3), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026141
105.
LykkenD. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology anyway? In CiccettiD.GroveW. (Eds.) Thinking clearly about psychology (pp. 3–39). University of Minnesota Press.
106.
MainieroL.SullivanS. (2006). The opt-out revolt. Nicholas Brealey America.
107.
MakelM. C.KellH. J.LubinskiD.PutallazM.BenbowC. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27(7), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735
McCabeK. O.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2020). Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000239
110.
MeehlP. E. (1970). Nuisance variables and the ex post facto design. In RadnerM.WinokurS. (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science:Vol. IV. Analyses of theories and methods of physics and psychology (pp. 373-402). University of Minnesota Press.
111.
MeehlP. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806
112.
MeehlP. E. (1989). Paul E. Meehl. In LindzeyG. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 8, pp. 337–389). Stanford University Press.
113.
MeehlP. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1(2), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1
MenningerK. A. (1938). Man against himself. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
116.
MichelA. (2012). Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 325–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212437519
NgT. W.EbyL. T.SorensenK. L.FeldmanD. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
121.
NolanC. (Director). (2012). The dark knight rises [Film]. Warner Bros.
122.
The Notorious B. I. G. (1997). Mo money mo problems [song]. On Life after death. Bad Boy Records.
123.
OdenM. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-year follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 77(1), 3–93.
RozinP. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2–14.
132.
RozinP. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward? A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.x
133.
RussoA.RussoJ. (Directors). (2018). Avengers: Infinity war [Film]. Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
134.
SamuelL. R. (2012). The American dream: A cultural history. Syracuse University Press.
135.
SandersD.BlackJ. N. (1998). Power, money & sex: How success almost ruined my life. Thomas Nelson.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
138.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162
ShakespeareW. (2009). The second part of the history of Henry IV. In WilsonJ. D. (Ed.), The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare (Vol. 9, pp. 1–231). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1600)
143.
SimontonD. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. Guilford Press.
144.
SimontonD. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford University Press.
SimontonD. K. (2014b). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614543973
147.
SimontonD. K. (2014c). Significant samples—Not significance tests! The often overlooked solution to the replication problem. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 11–12.
148.
SimontonD. K.SongA. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, psychical and mental health, and achievement domain. Psychological Science, 20, 429–433.
149.
StanleyJ. C. (1990). Leta Hollingworth’s contributions to above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12(5), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199009553264
TermanL. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius.Vol. 1:Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.
153.
TermanL. M. (1954a). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9(6), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060516
154.
TermanL. M. (1954b). Scientists and nonscientists in a group of 800 gifted men. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 68(7), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093672
155.
TermanL. M.CoxC. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. 2:The early mental traits of 300 geniuses. Stanford University Press.
156.
TermanL. M.OdenM. (1947). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. 4:The gifted child grows up: Twenty-five years’ follow-up of a superior group. Stanford University Press.
157.
TermanL. M.OdenM. (1959). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. 5:The gifted group at mid-life: Thirty-five years’ follow-up of the superior child. Stanford University Press.
TroubetzkoyA. S. (2002). Imperial legend: The mysterious disappearance of Tsar Alexander I. Arcade Publishing.
160.
UnderwoodE. (2014). Can disparities be deadly? Controversial research explores whether living in an unequal society can make people sick. Science, 344(6186), 829–831. https://doi.org/126/science.344.6186.829
161.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979. Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University. https://www.nlsinfo.org/content/cohorts/nlsy79
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.
WeinerM. H.HornbacherS.JacquemettonA.JacquemettonM.LeahyJ. (Executive Producers). (2007–2015). Mad men [TV series]. Weiner Bros. Productions; Lionsgate Television; AMC Original Productions.
167.
WellesO. (Director). (1941). Citizen Kane [Film]. RKO Pictures.
168.
WhiteR. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
169.
WilkS. L.DesmaraisL. B.SackettP. R. (1995). Gravitation to jobs commensurate with ability: Longitudinal and cross-sectional tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.79
