Tools and tests for measuring the presence and complexity of consciousness are becoming available, but there is no established theoretical approach for what these tools are measuring. This article examines several categories of tests for making reasonable inferences about the presence and complexity of consciousness (defined as the capacity for phenomenal/subjective experience) and also suggests ways in which different theories of consciousness may be empirically distinguished. We label the various ways to measure consciousness the measurable correlates of consciousness (MCC) and include three subcategories in our taxonomy: (a) neural correlates of consciousness, (b) behavioral correlates of consciousness, and (c) creative correlates of consciousness. Finally, we reflect on how broader philosophical views about the nature of consciousness, such as materialism and panpsychism, may also be informed by the scientific process.
AkamT.KullmannD. M. (2012). Efficient ‘communication through coherence’ requires oscillations structured to minimize interference between signals. PLOS Computational Biology, 8(11), Article e1002760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002760
2.
AruJ.BachmannT. (2013). Phenomenal awareness can emerge without attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00891
3.
BaarsB. J. (1993). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
BrunetN.BosmanC. A.RobertsM.OostenveldR.WomelsdorfT.De WeerdP.FriesP. (2013). Visual cortical gamma-band activity during free viewing of natural images. Cerebral Cortex, 25(4), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht280
7.
CardinJ. A.CarlénM.MeletisK.KnoblichU.ZhangF.DeisserothK.TsaiL.-H.MooreC. I. (2009). Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature, 459, 663–667.
8.
CasarottoS.ComanducciA.RosanovaM.SarassoS.FecchioM.NapolitaniM.PigoriniA.CasaliA.TrimarchiP.BolyM.GosseriesO.BodartO.CurtoF.LandiC.MariottiM.DevalleG.LaureysS.TononiG.MassiminiM. (2016). Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity. Annals of Neurology, 80(5), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24779
9.
ChalmersD. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
ColeE. J.StimpsonK. H.BentzleyB. S.GulserM.CherianK.TischlerC.NejadR.PankowH.ChoiE.AaronH.EspilF. M.PannuJ.XiaoX.DuvioD.SolvasonH. B.HawkinsJ.GuerraA.JoB.RajK. S.. . . WilliamsN. R. (2020). Stanford accelerated intelligent neuromodulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 177(8), 716-726. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720
12.
CrickF.KochC. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263–275.
13.
DarwinC. (2014). On the origin of species: By means of natural selection. Arcturus. (Original work published 1859)
14.
DavisK. L.MontagC. (2019). Selected principles of Pankseppian affective neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, Article 1025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.01025
15.
DehaeneS. (2014). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. Penguin.
16.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ. P. (2004). Neural mechanisms for access to consciousness. The cognitive neurosciences, 3, 1145–1158.
17.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ. P. (2005). Ongoing spontaneous activity controls access to consciousness: A neuronal model for inattentional blindness. PLOS Biology, 3, Article e141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030141
18.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ.-P.NaccacheL.SackurJ.SergentC. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
19.
DehaeneS.KerszbergM.ChangeuxJ. P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 14529–14534.
20.
DehaeneS.NaccacheL. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.
21.
DehaeneS.SergentC.ChangeuxJ. P. (2003). A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100(14), 8520–8525. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1332574100
22.
DemertziA.TagliazucchiE.DehaeneS.DecoG.BarttfeldP.RaimondoF.MartialC.Fernández-EspejoD.RohautB.VossH. U.SchiffN. D.OwenA. M.LaureysS.NaccacheL.SittJ. D. (2019). Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Science Advances, 5(2), Article aat7603. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat7603
23.
DennettD. C. (2008). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books.
24.
DysonF. (1979). Disturbing the universe. Basic Books.
25.
FalkensteinM.HoormannJ.HohnsbeinJ. (2002). Inhibition-related ERP components: Variation with modality, age, and time-on-task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 16, 167–175.
26.
FaugerasF. (2011). Probing consciousness with event-related potentials in the vegetative state. Neurology, 77, 264–268.
27.
FischerC.LuauteL.MorletD. (2010). Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121, 1032–1042.
28.
FörsterJ.KoivistoM.RevonsuoA. (2020). ERP and MEG correlates of visual consciousness: The second decade. Consciousness and Cognition, 80, 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102917
GailA.BrinksmeyerH. J.EckhornR. (2000). Contour decouples gamma activity across texture representation in monkey striate cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 840–850.
31.
GallottoS.SackA. T.SchuhmannT.de GraafT. A. (2017). Oscillatory correlates of visual consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01147
32.
GhanbariZ.MoradiM. H. (2020). FSIFT-PLV: An emerging phase synchrony index. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 57, 101764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101764
33.
GoffP. (2017). Consciousness and fundamental reality. Oxford University Press.
34.
GrayC. M.SingerW. (1989). Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 86, 1698–702.
35.
GregoriouG. G.GottsS. J.ZhouH.DesimoneR. (2009). High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science, 324, 1207–1210. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171402
36.
GriffenD. (1997). Panexperientialist physicalism and the mind-body problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(3), 248–268.
37.
GriffinD. R. (2001). Animal minds: Beyond cognition to consciousness. University of Chicago Press.
38.
GroppeD. M.BickelS.KellerC. J.JainS. K.HwangS. T.HardenC.MehtaA. D. (2013). Dominant frequencies of resting human brain activity as measured by the electrocorticogram. NeuroImage, 79, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.044
39.
HalesC. G. (2017). The origins of the brain’s endogenous electromagnetic field and its relationship to provision of consciousness. In Biophysics of consciousness: A foundational approach (pp. 295–354). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814644266_0010
40.
HermesD.MillerK. J.WandellB. A.WinawerJ. (2015). Stimulus dependence of gamma oscillations in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2951–2959. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu091
41.
HileyB. J.PeatF. D. (1987). Quantum implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm. Routledge.
42.
HöllerY.KronbichlerM.BergmannJ.CroneJ. S.LadurnerG.GolaszewskiS. (2011). EEG frequency analysis of responses to the own-name stimulus. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(1), 99–106.
43.
HuntT. (2011). Kicking the psychophysical laws into gear a new approach to the combination problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(11–12), 96–134.
44.
HuntT. (2014). Eco, ego, eros: Essays in philosophy, spirituality and science. Aramis Press.
45.
HuntT. (2016). Taking time seriously in Tononi’s integrated information theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(9–10), 88–110.
HuntT. (2020). Calculating the boundaries of consciousness in General Resonance Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11–12, 27.
48.
HuntT.SchoolerJ. W. (2019). The easy part of the hard problem: A resonance theory of consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00378
49.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. H. Holt.
50.
JohnE. R. (2001). A field theory of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10(2), 184–213.
51.
JonesM. (2013). Electromagnetic-field theories of mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(11–12), 124–149.
52.
KingJ. R.SittJ. D.FaugerasF.RohautB.El KarouiI.CohenL.NaccaheL.DehaeneS. (2013). Information sharing in the brain indexes consciousness in noncommunicative patients. Current Biology, 23, 1914–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.075
53.
KlimeschW. (2018). The frequency architecture of brain and brain body oscillations: An analysis. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(7), 2431–2453. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14192
54.
KochC. (2004). The quest for consciousness: A neurobiological approach. Roberts & Company Publishers.
55.
KochC. (2019). The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can’t be computed. The MIT Press.
56.
KochC.TsuchiyaN. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.012
KouiderS.StahlhutC.GelskovS. V.BarbosaL. S.DutatM.de GardelleV.ChristopheA.DehaeneS.Dehaene-LambertzG. (2013). A neural marker of perceptual consciousness in infants. Science, 340(6130), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232509
59.
KumarS.GanderP. E.BergerJ. I.BilligA. J.NourskiK. V.OyaH.KawasakiH.HowardM. A.IIIGriffithsT. D. (2020). Oscillatory correlates of auditory working memory examined with human electrocorticography. Neuropsychologia, 150, 107691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107691
60.
LakatosP.GrossJ.ThutG. (2019). A new unifying account of the roles of neuronal entrainment. Current Biology, 29(18), 890–R905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075
61.
LakatosP.ShahA. S.KnuthK. H.UlbertI.KarmosG.SchroederC. E. (2005). An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(3), 1904–1911. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00263.2005
LeDouxJ. (2019). The deep history of ourselves: How ancient microbes became conscious brains [Audiobook]. Penguin Audio.
64.
LeungA.CohenD.Van SwinderenB.TsuchiyaN. (2021). Integrated information structure collapses with anesthetic loss of conscious arousal in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS Computational Biology, 17(2), Article e1008722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008722
65.
LibetB. (2005). Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness. Harvard University Press.
66.
MashourG. A.RoelfsemaP.ChangeuxJ.-P.DehaeneS. (2020). Conscious processing and the global neuronal workspace hypothesis. Neuron, 105, 776–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026
67.
MassiminiM.BolyM.CasaliA.RosanovaM.TononiG. (2009). A perturbational approach for evaluating the brain’s capacity for consciousness. Progress in Brain Research, 177, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17714-2
68.
McFaddenJ. (2002a). The Conscious Electromagnetic Information (CEMI) field theory: The hard problem made easy?Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(8), 45–60.
69.
McFaddenJ. (2002b). Synchronous firing and its influence on the brain’s electromagnetic field: Evidence for an electromagnetic field theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(4), 23–50.
70.
McFaddenJ. (2013). The CEMI field theory: Closing the loop. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(1–2), 153–168.
71.
MichelM.BeckD.BlockN.BlumenfeldH.BrownR.CarmelD.CarrascoM.ChirimuutaM.ChunM.CleeremansA.DehaeneS.FlemingS. M.FrithC.HaggardP.BiyuJ. H.HeyesC.GoodaleM. A.IrvineL.KawatoM.. . . YoshidaM. (2019). Opportunities and challenges for a maturing science of consciousness. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0531-8
72.
OizumiM.AlbantakisL.TononiG. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0. PLOS Computational Biology, 10(5), Article e1003588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003588
73.
PankseppJ.BivenL. (2012). The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. W. W. Norton.
74.
PetersonN. N.SchroederC. E.ArezzoJ. C. (1995). Neural generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in the awake monkey. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 96(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(95)00006-E
75.
PikovskyA.RosenblumM.KurthsJ. (2002). Synchronization: A universal concept nonlinear science. Cambridge University Press.
PittsM. A.MartínezA.HillyardS. A. (2012). Visual processing of contour patterns under conditions of inattentional blindness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00111
78.
PittsM. A.MetzlerS.HillyardS. A. (2014). Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one’s perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01078
79.
PittsM. A.PadwalJ.FennellyD.MartínezA.HillyardS. A. (2014). Gamma band activity and the P3 reflect post-perceptual processes, not visual awareness. NeuroImage, 101, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.024
80.
PockettS. (2000). The nature of consciousness. Writers Club Press.
81.
PockettS. (2012). The electromagnetic field theory of consciousness: A testable hypothesis about the characteristics of conscious as opposed to non-conscious fields. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(11–12), 191–223.
82.
RailoH.KoivistoM.RevonsuoA. (2011). Tracking the processes behind conscious perception: A review of event-related potential correlates of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.019
SchelonkaK.GraultyC.Canseco-GonzalezE.PittsM. A. (2017). ERP signatures of conscious and unconscious word and letter perception in an inattentional blindness paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 54, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.009
87.
SchlossmacherI.DellertT.PittsM.BruchmannM.StraubeT. (2020). Differential effects of awareness and task relevance on early and late ERPs in a no-report visual oddball paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(14), 2906–2913. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2077-19.2020
88.
SchoolerJ. W.HuntT.SchoolerJ. N. (2011). Reconsidering the metaphysics of science from the inside out. In WalachH.SchmidtS.JonasW. B. (Eds.), Neuroscience, consciousness and spirituality (pp. 157–194). Springer.
89.
ShaftoJ. P.PittsM. A. (2015). Neural signatures of conscious face perception in an inattentional blindness paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 10940–10948.
90.
SittJ. D.KingJ.-R.KarouiI. E.RohautB.FaugerasF.GramfortA.CohenL.SigmanM.DehaeneS.NaccacheL. (2014). Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain, 137, 2258–2270.
91.
SteriadeM.McCormickD. A.SejnowskiT. J. (1993). Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science, 262, 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8235588
92.
Tallon-BaudryC. (2012). On the neural mechanisms subserving consciousness and attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00397
93.
TiesingaP.SejnowskiT. J. (2009). Cortical enlightenment: Are attentional gamma oscillations driven by ING or PING?Neuron, 63, 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.009
94.
TononiG.BolyM.MassiminiM.KochC. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461.
95.
TraubR. D.WhittingtonM. A.CollingS. B.BuzsákiG.JefferysJ. G. (1996). Analysis of gamma rhythms in the rat hippocampus in vitro and in vivo. The Journal of Physiology, 493(Pt. 2), 471–484.
TsuchiyaN.WilkeM.FrässleS.LammeV. A. (2015). No-report paradigms: Extracting the true neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002
98.
TuringA. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. MIT Press.
99.
TzovaraA.SimoninA.OddoM.RossettiA. O.De LuciaM. (2015). Neural detection of complex sound sequences in the absence of consciousness. Brain, 138(Pt. 5), 1160–1166.
100.
VitaleK. R.BehnkeA. C.UdellM. A. (2019). Attachment bonds between domestic cats and humans. Current Biology, 29(18), R864–R865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.036
101.
WalleczekJ. (Ed.). (2006). Self-organized biological dynamics and nonlinear control: Toward understanding complexity, chaos and emergent function in living systems. Cambridge University Press.
102.
WinfreeA. T. (1980). The geometry of biological time. Springer.
103.
WyartV.Tallon-BaudryC. (2008). Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(10), 2667–2679. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4748-07.2008
104.
YoungA.HuntT.EricsonM.SchoolerJ. (2019). The slowest shared resonance: A review of the data on shared resonance between brain and peripheral nervous system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00378
