Student outcomes are influenced by different types of motivation that stem from external incentives, ego involvement, personal value, and intrinsic interest. The types of motivation described in self-determination theory each co-occur to different degrees and should lead to different consequences. The associations with outcomes are due in part to unique characteristics and in part to the degree of autonomy each entails. In the current meta-analysis, we examine these different types of motivation in 344 samples (223,209 participants) as they relate to 26 performance, well-being, goal orientation, and persistence-related student outcomes. Findings highlight that intrinsic motivation is related to student success and well-being, whereas personal value (identified regulation) is particularly highly related to persistence. Ego-involved motives (introjected regulation) were positively related to persistence and performance goals but also positively related with indicators of ill-being. Motivation driven by a desire to obtain rewards or avoid punishment (external regulation) was not associated with performance or persistence but was associated with decreased well-being. Finally, amotivation was related to poor outcomes. Relative weights analysis further estimates the degree to which motivation types uniquely predict outcomes, highlighting that identified regulation and intrinsic motivation are likely key factors for school adjustment.
AbramsonL. Y.SeligmanM. E.TeasdaleJ. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49–74.
2.
AngristJ.LavyV. (2009). The effects of high stakes high school achievement awards: Evidence from a randomized trial. American Economic Review, 99, 1384–1414. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1384
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
BurtonK. D.LydonJ. E.D’AlessandroD. U.KoestnerR. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 91, 750–762.
6.
CerasoliC. P.NicklinJ. M.FordM. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008.
7.
ChemolliE.GagnéM. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 575–585.
8.
CheonS. H.ReeveJ. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111.
9.
CheonS. H.ReeveJ.MoonI. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 365–396.
10.
ChirkovV. I. (2009). A cross-cultural analysis of autonomy in education: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 253–262.
11.
CianiK. D.SheldonK. M.HilpertJ. C.EasterM. A. (2011). Antecedents and trajectories of achievement goals: A self-determination theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 223–243.
12.
CrockerJ. (2008). From egosystem to ecosystem: Implications for relationships, learning and well-being. In WaymentH. A.BauerJ. J. (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 63–72). American Psychological Association.
13.
CsikszentmihalyiM.AbuhamdehS.NakamuraJ. (2014). Flow. In CsikszentmihalyiM. (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 227–238). Springer.
14.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170–180.
15.
DeciE. L.EghrariH.PatrickB. C.LeoneD. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.
16.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
17.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27.
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M.GuayF. (2013). Self-determination theory and actualization of human potential. In McInerneyD. M.MarshH. W.CravenR. G.GuayF. (Eds.), Theory driving research: New wave perspectives on self-processes and human development (pp. 109–133). Information Age Publishing.
19.
DudaJ. L. (1989). Goal perspectives, participation and persistence in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 20, 40–63.
20.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.
21.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629–634.
22.
ElliotA. J. (2013). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. Psychology Press.
23.
ElliotA. J.HullemanC. S. (2017). Achievement goals. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S.YeagerD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (Vol. 2, pp. 43–60). Guilford Press.
FryerR. G. (2011). Financial incentives and student achievement: Evidence from randomized trials. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1755–1798.
26.
GagnéM.ForestJ.VansteenkisteM.Crevier-BraudL.Van Den BroeckA.AspeliA. K.BelleroseJ.BenabouC.ChemolliE.GüntertS. T.HalvariH.IndiyastutiD. L.JohnsonP. A.MolstadM. H.NaudinM.NdaoA.OlafsenA. H.RousselP.WangZ.WestbyeC. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 178–196.
27.
GottfriedA. E.MarcoulidesG. A.GottfriedA. W.OliverP. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 729–739.
28.
GuayF.BureauJ. S. (2018). Motivation at school: Differentiation between and within school subjects matters in the prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.05.004
29.
GuayF.DenaultA. S.RenauldS. (2017). School attachment and relatedness with parents, friends and teachers as predictors of students’ intrinsic and identified regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 416–428.
30.
HarterS. (2012). Emerging self-processes during childhood and adolescence. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 680–715). Guilford Press.
31.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65.
32.
HeinV.HaggerM. S. (2007). Global self-esteem, goal achievement orientations, and self-determined behavioural regulations in a physical education setting. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 149–159.
33.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
34.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327, 557–560.
35.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.BureauJ. S. (2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1346–1377.
36.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.MorinA. J.ForestJ. (2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44, 2638–2664.
37.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.Van den BroeckA.GuayF.ChatzisarantisN.NtoumanisN.PelletierL. G. (2020). A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09831-9
38.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00156
39.
JoussemetM.LandryR.KoestnerR. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49, 194–200.
40.
KoretzD. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. University of Chicago Press.
41.
KrappA. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409.
42.
KuhlJ.QuirinM.KooleS. L. (2015). Being someone: The integrated self as a neuropsychological system. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 115–132.
43.
KuncelN. R.CredéM.ThomasL. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–82.
44.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A.NeckermannS.SadoffS. (2016). The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(4), 183–219.
45.
LitalienD.GuayF.MorinA. J. S. (2015). Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006
46.
LitalienD.MorinA. J.GagnéM.VallerandR. J.LosierG. F.RyanR. M. (2017). Evidence of a continuum structure of academic self-determination: A two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 67–82.
47.
LosierG. F.KoestnerR. (1999). Intrinsic versus identified regulation in distinct political campaigns: The consequences of following politics for pleasure versus personal meaningfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 287–298.
NgJ. Y. Y.NtoumanisN.Thogersen-NtoumaniC.DeciE. L.RyanR. M.DudaJ. L.WilliamsG. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
50.
NicholsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.
51.
NiuL. (2016). Parental motivational practice, parent involvement, and students’ choice of study field in college. World Journal of Education, 6(5), 36–48.
52.
NtoumanisN.NgJ. Y.PrestwichA.QuestedE.HancoxJ. E.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC.WilliamsG. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 214–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529.
53.
ParadiseA. W.KernisM. H. (2002). Self-esteem and psychological well-being: Implications of fragile self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 345–361.
54.
PelletierL. G.DionS.TusonK.Green-DemersI. (1999). Why do people fail to adopt environmental protective behaviors? Toward a taxonomy of environmental amotivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2481–2504.
55.
PelletierL. G.SharpE. C. (2009). Administrative pressures and teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in the classroom. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 174–183.
56.
RatelleC. F.GuayF.VallerandR. J.LaroseS.SenécalC. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734–746.
57.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
58.
ReeveJ. (1993). The face of interest. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 353–375.
59.
RothG.AssorA.NiemiecC. P.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2009). The emotional and academic consequences of parental conditional regard: Comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1119–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015272
60.
RyanR. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450
61.
RyanR. M. (2018). Sibling theories: Some reflections on the commonalities between PSI and SDT. In BaumannN.KazénM.QuirinM.KooleS. L. (Eds.), Why people do the things they do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s contributions to the psychology of motivation and volition (pp. 237–242). Hogrefe Publishing.
62.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
63.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
64.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 6, pp. 111–156). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
65.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
66.
RyanR. M.WeinsteinN. (2009). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 224–233.
67.
ScherrerV.PreckelF.SchmidtI.ElliotA. J. (2020). Development of achievement goals and their relation to academic interest and achievement in adolescence: A review of the literature and two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 56, 795–814.
68.
SchunkD. H.DiBenedettoM. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. Handbook of Motivation at School, 2, 34–54.
69.
SheldonK. M.OsinE. N.GordeevaT. O.SuchkovD. D.SychevO. A. (2017). Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1215–1238.
70.
SlempG. R.KernM. L.PatrickK. J.RyanR. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42, 706–724.
71.
SterneJ. A.GavaghanD.EggerM. (2000). Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 1119–1129.
72.
SuY. L.ReeveJ. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188.
73.
TaylorG.JungertT.MageauG. A.SchattkeK.DedicH.RosenfieldS.KoestnerR. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 342–358.
74.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3
75.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M. (2015). RWA web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z
76.
VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.BlaisM. R.BriereN. M.SenecalC.VallieresE. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.
77.
VasconcellosD.ParkerP. D.HillandT.CinelliR.OwenK. B.KapsalN.LeeJ.AntczakD.NtoumanisN.RyanR. M.LonsdaleC. (2019). Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420
78.
VasquezA. C.PatallE. A.FongC. J.CorriganA. S.PineL. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 605–644.
79.
WangJ.MorinA.RyanR.LiuW. (2016). Students’ motivational profiles in the physical education context. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38, 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0153
80.
WigfieldA.RosenzweigE.EcclesJ. (2017). Achievement values. In ElliottA. J.DweckC. S.YeagerD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 116–134). Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
