The bureaucratization of psychological science exacts intellectual costs that go beyond the sheer amount of time that is drained away from creative scientific activity. Additional administrative hurdles are now being generated in an attempt to ensure the replicability of psychological effects. A cognitive analysis of those hurdles shows that impairment of scientific creativity is a foreseeable consequence, owing to their frequent verbatim-processing focus and the negative emotional context in which they are embedded. We consider whether it is possible to enhance replicability without increasing bureaucratic obstacles and to enhance scientific creativity in the presence of such obstacles.
BookbinderS. H.BrainerdC. J. (2016). Emotion and false memory: The context-content paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 315–351.
4.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.
5.
BrainerdC. J.ReynaV. F. (2005). The science of false memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrainerdC. J.ReynaV. F.BrandseE. (1995). Are children’s false memories more persistent than their true memories?Psychological Science, 6, 359–364.
7.
ByronK.KhazanchiS. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 809–830.
8.
ChambersC. D.FeredoesE.MuthukumaraswamyS. D.EtchellsP. J. (2014). Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 1, 4–17.
9.
CraikF. I. M.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 286–294.
10.
CropleyD. H.CropleyA. J. (2008). Resolving the paradoxes of creativity: An extended phase model. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38, 355–373.
11.
FiedlerK. (2017). What constitutes strong psychological science? The (neglected) role of diagnosticity and a priori theorizing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 46–61.
12.
HamlinJ. K. (2017). Is psychology moving in the right direction? An analysis of the evidentiary value movement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 690–693.
13.
IsenA. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
KintschW.WelschD.SchmalhoferF.ZimnyS. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133–159.
15.
KnottL. M.ThreadgoldE.HoweM. L. (2014). Negative mood state impairs false memory priming when problem-solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 580–587.
16.
KuenneM. R. (1946). Experimental investigation of the relation of language to transposition behavior in young children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 471–490.
17.
LampinenJ. M.CopelandS. M.NeuschatzJ. S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1211–1222.
18.
MednickS. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
19.
MestreJ. P. (Ed.). (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
20.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
21.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, Article aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
22.
PayneD. G.ElieC. J.BlackwellJ. M.NeuschatzJ. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261–285.
23.
ReynaV. F.BrainerdC. J. (2011). Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model. Developmental Review, 31, 180–206.
24.
ReynaV. F.CorbinJ. C.WeldonR. B.BrainerdC. J. (2016). How fuzzy-trace theory predicts true and false memories for words, sentences, and narratives. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 1–9.
25.
SchacterD. L.IsraelL.RacineC. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1–24.
26.
SeamonJ. G.GoodkindM. S.DumeyA. D.DickE.AufseeserM. S.StricklandS. E., . . . FungN. S. (2003). “If I didn’t write it, why would I remember it?” Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 445–457.
27.
SimontonD. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475
28.
SternbergR. J. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
StorbeckJ.CloreG. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16, 785–791.
30.
StorbeckJ.CloreG. L. (2011). Affect influences false memories at encoding: Evidence from recognition data. Emotion, 11, 981–989.
