In this afterword, I suggest expanding upon some of the criteria for judging scientific merit that have been discussed in the two symposia on “judging scholarly merit in psychological science.” I discuss in particular the value of creativity, analysis, common sense, and wisdom and ethics in scientific contributions and discourse. In the course of this discussion, I consider where the field of judging scientific merit has been, where it is now, and where it may go.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
2.
BaltesP. B.SmithJ. (1990). Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 87–120). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 75–80.
4.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122–136.
5.
BerscheidE. (2003). On stepping on land mines. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Psychologists defying the crowd (pp. 33–44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
CheekN. (2017). Scholarly merit in a global context: The nation gap in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1133–1137.
7.
CropleyA. J. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28, 125–130.
8.
CropleyA. J. (2007). Functional creativity: A concept of socially-useful creativity. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 7, 26–38.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2013). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
10.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
11.
DaiD. Y.SternbergR. J. (Eds.). (2004). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.). (2003). The psychology of problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DavisK.ChristodoulouJ.SeiderS.GardnerH. (2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 485–503). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
De RosaE. (2017). Will analytics suppress a diversity of ideas in psychological science?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1138–1140.
15.
DienerE. (2016). Improving departments of psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 909–912.
16.
EaglyA. H.MillerD. I. (2016). Scientific eminence: Where are the women?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 899–904.
17.
FeistG. J. (2016). Intrinsic and extrinsic science: A dialectic of scientific fame. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 893–898.
18.
FossD. J. (2016). Eminence and omniscience: Statistical and clinical prediction of merit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 913–916.
19.
FreundA. (2017). Why would I want to be famous? The ill-fated quest for fame in psychological research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1141–1144.
20.
FunkeJ. (2017). Scholarly merits: From measurement to judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1145–1147.
21.
GardnerH. (2011). Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
GlückJ. (2017). . . . and the wisdom to know the difference: Scholarly success from a wisdom perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1148–1152.
23.
HennesseyB. A. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom: Have we come full circle? In BeghettoR. A.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed., pp. 227–264). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KaufmanJ. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189–203.
25.
KaufmanJ. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
KaufmanJ. C.PluckerJ. A. (2010). Intelligence and creativity. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 771–783). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.). (2010). Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KihlstromJ. F.CantorN. (2011). Social intelligence. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 564–581). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LoftusE. F. (2003). The dangers of memory. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Psychologists defying the crowd (pp. 105–117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
LohmanD. F.LakinJ. M. (2011). Intelligence and reasoning. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 419–441). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LubartT. I.MouchiroudC. (2017). TOUGH: The measure of merit in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1159–1161.
33.
LutharS. (2017). Doing for the greater good: What price, in academe?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1153–1158.
34.
MarshE. (2017). Family matters: Measuring impact through one’s academic descendants. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1130–1132.
35.
MayerJ. D.SaloveyP.CarusoD. R.CherkasskiyL. (2011). Emotional intelligence. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 528–549). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
RoedigerH. L. (2016). Varieties of fame in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 882–887.
37.
RuscioJ. (2016). Taking advantage of citation measures of scholarly impact: Hip hip h index!Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 905–908.
38.
SarasonS. (1988). The making of an American psychologist. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
SawyerR. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
SawyerR. K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
41.
SimontonD. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
SimontonD. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Wiley handbook of genius. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
43.
SimontonD. K. (2016). Giving credit where credit’s due: Why it’s so hard to do in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 888–892.
44.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F.ToplakM. E. (2011). Intelligence and rationality. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 784–826). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SternbergR. J. (Ed.). (1985a). Human abilities: An information-processing approach. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
46.
SternbergR. J. (1985b). Teaching critical thinking, Part 1: Are we making critical mistakes?Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 194–198.
47.
SternbergR. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
48.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Managerial intelligence: Why IQ isn’t enough. Journal of Management, 23, 475–493.
49.
SternbergR. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.
50.
SternbergR. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.
51.
SternbergR. J. (Ed.). (2000a). Guide to publishing in psychology journals. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SternbergR. J. (2000b). Teaching psychology students about creativity as a decision. Psychology Teaching Review, 9, 111–118.
53.
SternbergR. J. (2001a). The role of creativity in the dialectical evolution of ideas. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2(1), 39–43.
54.
SternbergR. J. (2001b). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36, 227–245.
55.
SternbergR. J. (2003a). WICS: A model for leadership in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2, 386–401.
56.
SternbergR. J. (2003b). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SternbergR. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities?International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 370–382.
58.
SternbergR. J. (2009). WICS: A new model for liberal education. Liberal Education, 95(4), 20–25.
59.
SternbergR. J. (2010a). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
SternbergR. J. (2010b). The dark side of creativity and how to combat it. In CropleyD. H.CropleyA. J.KaufmanJ. C.RuncoM. A. (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 316–328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SternbergR. J. (2011). The theory of successful intelligence. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 504–527). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SternbergR. J. (Ed.). (2013). Writing successful grant proposals from the top down and the bottom up. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
SternbergR. J. (2016a). “Am I famous yet?” Judging scholarly merit in psychological science: An introduction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 877–881.
64.
SternbergR. J. (2016b). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/aca0000095
65.
SternbergR. J. (2016c). Psychology 101 ½: The unspoken rules for success in academia (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
66.
SternbergR. J. (2016d). What universities can be. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67.
SternbergR. J. (2017). Starting your career in academic psychology. Washington, DC: APA Books.
68.
SternbergR. J. (in press). The theory of successful intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (1982, June). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, 37–44.
70.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (1983). Insight in the gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18, 51–57.
71.
SternbergR. J.FiskeS. E. (Eds.). (2015). Ethical challenges in the behavioral and brain sciences: Case studies and commentaries. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SternbergR. J.FiskeS. T.FossD. J. (Eds.). (2016). Scientists making a difference: One hundred eminent behavioral and brain scientists talk about their most important contributions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
73.
SternbergR. J.ForsytheG. B.HedlundJ.HorvathJ.SnookS.WilliamsW. M.WagnerR. K.GrigorenkoE. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2004). Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 43, 274–280.
75.
SternbergR. J.HedlundJ. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance, 15, 143–160.
76.
SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C.PretzJ. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
77.
SternbergR. J.LubartT. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
78.
SternbergR. J.SternbergK. (2016). The psychologist’s companion (6th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79.
SyedM. (2017). Why traditional metrics may not adequately represent ethnic minority psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1162–1165.
80.
TaylorS. (1988). Health psychology. New York, NY: Random House.
81.
WagnerR. K. (2011). Practical intelligence. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 564–582). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
82.
WangQ. (2017). Putting culture in the middle in judging scholarly merit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1166–1170.
83.
WeinsteinY.SumerackiM. A. (2017). Are Twitter and blogs important tools for the modern psychological scientist?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1171–1175.
84.
ZárateM.HallG.PlautV. (2017). Researchers of color, fame, and impact. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1176–1178.
85.
ZuckermanH. (1977). Scientific elite. New York, NY: Free Press.
