Social norms are a defining feature of human psychology, yet our understanding of them is still underdeveloped. In this article, we present our own cross-cultural research program on tightness-looseness (TL)—which draws on field, experimental, computational, and neuroscience methods—to illustrate how going beyond Western borders is critical for understanding social norms’ functions and their multilevel consequences. Cross-cultural research enables us to account for the universal features of norm psychology but also explains the great cultural diversity we see in social norms around the globe.
ArnettJ. J. (1995). Broad and narrow socialization: The family in the context of a cultural theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 617–628.
2.
AschS. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 222–236). Oxford, England: Carnegie Press.
3.
BanduraA. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29.
4.
BarryH.IIIChildI. L.BaconM. K. (1959). Relation of child training to subsistence economy. American Anthropologist, 61, 51–63.
5.
BellezzaS.GinoF.KeinanA. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 35–54.
6.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London, England: Penguin.
7.
BerryJ. W. (1967). Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 415–418.
8.
BerryJ. W. (1979). A cultural ecology of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
BoldtE. D.RobertsL. W. (1979). Structural tightness and social conformity: A methodological note with theoretical implications. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 10, 221–230.
10.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CaluoriN. E.JacksonJ. C.GelfandM. G. (2017, January). Mean gods on your side: The role of intergroup threat in the origination of moralizing gods. Poster presented at the Religion and Spirituality Preconference at the annual meeting for the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
12.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.
13.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
14.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.GardnerL. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
DeS.NauD. S.GelfandM. J. (2017, May). Understanding norm change: An evolutionary game-theoretic approach. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, São Paulo, Brazil.
16.
FrinkD. D.KlimoskiR. J. (2004). Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the Human Resource Management Review special edition. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 1–17.
17.
GeeraertN.LiR.WardC.GelfandM. J.DemesK. (2017). A tight spot: How personality moderates the impact of social norms on sojourner adaptation. Manuscript under review.
GelfandM. J.LunJ. (2013). Ecological priming: Convergent evidence for the link between ecology and psychological processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 489–490.
20.
GelfandM. J.NishiiL. H.RaverJ. L. (2006). On the nature and important of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225–1244.
21.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C., . . . AycanZ. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.
22.
GreenfieldP. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 1722–1731.
23.
GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. (2015). Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science, 26, 311–324.
24.
HalberstadtJ.JacksonJ. C.BilkeyD.JongJ.WhitehouseH.McNaughtonC.ZollmannS. (2016). Incipient social groups: An analysis via in-vivo behavioral tracking. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0149880.
25.
HarringtonJ. R.BoskiP.GelfandM. J. (2015). Culture and national well-being: Should societies emphasize freedom or constraint?PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127173.
26.
HarringtonJ. R.GelfandM. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111, 7990–7995.
27.
HarringtonJ. R.GelfandM. J. (2017). Worlds unto themselves: Tightness-looseness and social class. Manuscript in preparation.
28.
Herodotus. (1998). The histories (WaterfieldR. Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
JacksonJ. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In SteinerI. D.FishbeinM. (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). New York, NY: Holt.
30.
JacksonJ. C.BilkeyD.JongJ.Rossignac-MilonM.HalberstadtJ. H. (2017a). Strangers in a stadium: Studying group dynamics with in-vivo behavioral tracking. Social Psychological & Personality Science doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709112
31.
JacksonJ. C.GelfandM. J. (2016). On the evolution of tightness-looseness in cultural ecosystems. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7, 155–158.
32.
JacksonJ. C.GelfandM. J.AyubN.WheelerJ. (2017). Together from afar: Using a diary contact technique to reduce conflict across cultures. Manuscript under review.
33.
JacksonJ. C.GelfandM. J.EmberC. (2017, February). Ecological threat and the transmission of cultural tightness-looseness. Talk given at the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting, Boston, MA.
34.
JacksonJ. C.GelfandM. J.FoxA. M. (2016, May). The temporal signature of cultural tightness-looseness. Presentation given at the 28th Annual Association for Psychological Science Convention, Chicago, IL.
35.
JacksonJ. C.RandD. G.LewisK.NortonM. I.GrayK. (2017b). Agent based modeling: A guide for social psychologists. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 387–395
36.
JacobsR. C.CampbellD. T. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 649–658.
37.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford.
38.
KohnM. L. (1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
LaneJ. E. (2013). Method, theory, and multi-agent artificial intelligence: Creating computer models of complex social interaction. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 1, 161–180.
40.
LiC.GelfandM. J.KabstR. (2017, August). Influence of tightness-looseness on cross-border acquisition performance. Paper presented at the annual Conference of the Academy of Management. Atlanta, Georgia.
41.
LiR.GordonS.GelfandM. J. (2017). Tightness-looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(3), 377–391
42.
LomaxA.BerkowitzN. (1972). The evolutionary taxonomy of culture. Science, 177, 228–239.
43.
LunJ.GelfandM.MohrR. (2012). Attitudes toward deviance in tight and loose cultures. Poster presented at the Culture Preconference at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
44.
MilgramS. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.
45.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
46.
MischelW. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In MagnussonD.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
MrazekA. J.ChiaoJ. Y.BlizinskyK. D.LunJ.GelfandM. J. (2013). The role of culture-gene coevolution in morality judgment: Examining the interplay between tightness-looseness and allelic variation of the serotonin transporter gene. Culture and Brain, 1(2–4), 100–117.
48.
MuY.HanS.GelfandM. J. (2017). From one brain to many: Gamma interbrain synchrony enables interpersonal coordination under threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx093
49.
MuY.KitayamaS.HanS.GelfandM. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112, 15348–15353.
50.
NowakA.GelfandM. J.BorkowskiW.CohenD.HernandezI. (2015). The evolutionary basis of honor cultures. Psychological Science, 27, 12–24.
51.
NowakA.GelfandM. J.BorkowskiW.KruglanskiA. (2017). Autocratic recidivism: Computational models of why revolutions fail. In MoaddelM.GelfandM. J. (Eds.), Values, political action, and change in the Middle East and the Arab Spring (pp. 271–291). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
PeltoP. J. (1968). The differences between “tight” and “loose” societies. Society, 5(5), 37–40.
53.
PriceR. H.BouffardD. L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 579–586.
54.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 339–369.
55.
RoosP.GelfandM.NauD.LunJ. (2015). Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 14–23.
56.
SchallerM.LatanéB. (1996). Dynamic social impact and the evolution of social representations: A natural history of stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 64–77.
57.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Oxford, England: Harper.
58.
StamkouE.van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.GelfandM. J.van de VijverF. J. R.BoerD.. . . LeeI. (2016, August). Rising to power or falling from grace: Collectivism and tightness moderate responses to norm violators. Presentation at the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Nagoya, Japan.
59.
TriandisH. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. Oxford, England: John Wiley.
60.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279–292.
61.
van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.FinkenauerC.GündemirS.StamkouE. (2011). Breaking the rules to rise to power: How norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 500–507.
62.
van KleefG. A.WandersF.StamkouE.HomanA. C. (2015). The social dynamics of breaking the rules: Antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 25–31.
63.
WitkinH. A.BerryJ. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1975(1), i–100.
64.
WoodardC. (2011). American nations: A history of the eleven rival regional cultures of North America. New York, NY: Viking.
