The following article considers whether psychology is moving in the right direction by exploring the evidentiary value movement. Although the author considers the movement to be a net positive, she discusses concerns regarding the scope and tone of the discussions to date. She encourages the movement to consider heretofore underrepresented subfields and to reduce the use of negative tone.
AsendorpfJ. B.ConnerM.De FruytF.De HouwerJ.DenissenJ. J.FiedlerK.WichertsJ. M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119. doi:10.1002/per.1919
CollinsF. S.TabakL. A. (2014). NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature, 505, 612–613. doi:10.1038/505612a
5.
EichE. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25, 3–6. doi:10.1177/0956797613512465
6.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.ReisH. T. (2015). Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 275–297. doi:10.1037/pspi0000007
7.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.ReisH. T. (in press). Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.AlbertsH.AnggonoC. O.BataillerC.BirtA. R.. . . ZwienenbergM. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546–573. doi:10.1177/1745691616652873
10.
JohnL. K.LoewensteinG.PrelecD. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
11.
JonasK. J.CesarioJ. (2015). How can preregistration contribute to research in our field?Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 1, 1–7. doi:10.1080/23743603.2015.1070611
12.
KleinR. A.RatliffK. A.VianelloM.AdamsR. B.Jr.BahníkŠ.BernsteinM. J.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
13.
LedgerwoodA. (2014). Introduction to the special section on moving toward a cumulative science: Maximizing what our research can tell us. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 610–611. doi:10.1177/1745691614553989
NosekB. A.LakensD. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
16.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-1–aac4716-8. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
19.
SimonsD. J.HolcombeA. O.SpellmanB. A. (2014). An introduction to registered replication reports at perspectives on psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 552–555.
20.
SpellmanB. A. (2015). A short (personal) future history of revolution 2.0. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 886–899.
