CheungI.CampbellL.LeBelE.. . . YongJ. C. (2016). Registered Replication Report: Study 1 from Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 750–764.
2.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264.
3.
FehrR.GelfandM. J.NagM. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914.
4.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974.
5.
HuiC. M.FinkelE. J.FitzsimonsG. M.KumashiroM.HofmannW. (2014). The Manhattan effect: When relationship commitment fails to promote support for partner interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 546–570. doi:10.1037/a0035493
6.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
7.
RusbultC. E.OlsenN.DavisJ. L.HannonP. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
SeltermanD.ChagnonE.MackinnonS. (2015). Do men and women exhibit different preferences for mates? A replication of Eastwick & Finkel (2008). SAGE Open, 5(3). doi:10.1177/2158244015605160
9.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.