An important characteristic of knowledge is that it exists at multiple levels of abstraction. This article illustrates how different levels of abstraction influence perception, comprehension, categorization, memory, and thought. Theories exist for how abstraction influences each of these cognitive processes, but there are few unifying principles for discussing these theories within a common conceptual framework. My proposed taxonomy examines three senses of abstraction: (a) an abstract entity is a concept that has no material referent, (b) abstraction focuses on only some attributes of multicomponent stimuli, and (c) an abstract idea applies to many particular instances of a category. The first refers to instances, the second to attributes of instances, and the third to classes of instances. Concrete mental representations consist of modal images for instances, equivalent attributes, and exemplars or episodes for categories. Abstract mental representations consist of amodal propositions for instances, distinctive attributes, and rules or prototypes or schema for categories. I first apply the taxonomy to words, pictures, and problems. The next section shows how categorization strategies combine with abstraction at the attribute, instance, and category levels. The subsequent section applies the taxonomy to hierarchical (subordinate, basic, superordinate) levels. A concluding section proposes directions for further development.
AlfieriL.Nokes-MalachT. J.SchunnC. D. (2013). Learning through case comparisons: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 48, 87–113.
2.
AshbyF. G.MaddoxW. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149–178.
3.
AtkinsonR. C.RaughM. C. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126–133.
4.
BarrouillettP.PortartS.CamosV. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review, 118, 175–192.
5.
BarsalouL. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 27, pp. 1–64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
BarsalouL. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
7.
BelenkyD. M.SchalkL. (2014). The effects of idealized and grounded materials on learning, transfer, and interest: An organizing framework for categorizing external knowledge representation. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 27–50.
8.
BourneL. E.Jr. (1970). Knowing and using concepts. Psychological Review, 77, 546–556.
9.
BrandimonteM. A.GerbinoW. (1993). Mental image reversal and verbal recoding: When ducks become rabbits. Memory & Cognition, 21, 23–33.
10.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In ChaseW. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11.
BrunerJ. S.GoodnowJ. J.AustinG. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
BurgoonE. M.HendersonM. D.MarkmanA. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 501–520.
13.
ChambersD.ReisbergD. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 317–328.
14.
ChambersD.ReisbergD. (1992). What an image depicts depends on what an image means. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 145–174.
15.
ChengP. W.HolyoakK. J.NisbettR. E.OliverL. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293–328.
16.
ChiM. T. H.GlaserR.ReesE. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
ChunM. M.GolombJ. D.Turk-BrowneN. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.
18.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–248.
19.
De BockD.DepretzJ.Van DoorenW.RoelensM.VerschaffelL. (2011). Abstract or concrete examples in learning mathematics? A replication and elaboration of Kaminski, Sloutky, and Heckler’s study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 109–126.
20.
DysonG. (2012). Turing’s cathedral: The origins of the digital universe. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
21.
EgelandB. (1975). Effects of errorless training on teaching children to discriminate letters of the alphabet. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 533–536.
22.
FyfeE. R.McNeilN. M.SonJ. Y.GoldstoneR. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 9–25.
23.
GardnerH. (1993). Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books.
24.
GentnerD.LowensteinJ.ThompsonL.ForbusK. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical encoding supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 33, 1343–1382.
25.
GentnerD.SmithL. A. (2013). Analogical learning and reasoning. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 668–681). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
GibsonE. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
GlenbergA. M.GutierrezT.LevinJ. R.JapuntichS.KaschakM. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424–436.
28.
GlenbergA. M.KaschakM. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
29.
GoldstoneR. L.FengY.RogoskyB. (2005). Connecting concepts to the world and to each other. In PecherD.ZwaanR. A. (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception in action, memory, and thinking (pp. 219–314). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GoldstoneR. L.SonJ. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 69–110.
31.
GoldwaterM. B.MarkmanA. B.StilwellC. H. (2011). The empirical case for role-governed categories. Cognition, 118, 359–376.
32.
GoodmanN.UllmanT. D.TenenbaumJ. B. (2011). Learning a theory of causality. Psychological Review, 118, 110–119.
33.
GopnikA.WellmanH. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1085–1108.
34.
GraesserA. C.ForsythC. (2013). Discourse comprehension. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 475–491). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
GriggsR. A.CoxJ. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407–420.
36.
HamptonJ. A. (1997). Psychological representation of concepts. In ConwayM. A.GathercoleS. E. (Eds.), Cognitive models of memory (pp. 81–110). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
37.
HaygoodR. C.BourneL. E.Jr. (1965). Attribute and rule learning aspects of conceptual behavior. Psychological Review, 72, 175–195.
38.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689.
39.
HorchakO.GigerJ.-C.CabralM.PochwatkoG. (2014). From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems Research, 29–30, 66–85.
40.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (2012). Inference with mental models. In HolyoakK. J.MorrisonR. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 134–154). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
Johnson-LairdP. N.LegrenziP.LegrenziM. S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 395–400.
42.
KaminskiJ. A.SloutskyV. M.HecklerA. F. (2008, April25). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320, 454–455.
43.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KintschW.MangalathP. (2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 346–370.
45.
KintschW.van DijkT. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
46.
KnauffM. (2013). Space to reason: A spatial theory of human thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47.
KnauffM.Johnson-LairdP. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 30, 363–371.
48.
KosslynS. M. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. Psychological Review, 88, 46–66.
49.
KosslynS. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
KosslynS. M.ThompsonW. L.GanisG. (2002). Mental imagery doesn’t work like that. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 198–200.
51.
KotovskyL.GentnerD. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797–2822.
52.
KuhlP. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.
53.
KuhlP. K. (1993). Infant speech perception: A window on psycholinguistic development. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9, 33–56.
54.
KuhlP. K.WilliamsK. A.LacerdaF.StevensK. N.LindblomB. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 225, 606–608.
55.
KurtzK. J.BoukrinaO.GentnerD. (2013). Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1303–1310.
56.
LathropS. D.WintermuteS.LairdJ. E. (2011). Exploring the functional advantages of spatial and visual cognition from an architectural perspective. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 796–818.
57.
LoveB. C.MedinD. L.GureckisT. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of human category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309–322.
58.
McClellandJ. L.RogersT. T. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 310–322.
59.
McRaeK.JonesM. N. (2013). Semantic memory. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 206–219). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60.
MedinD. L.AltomM. S.EdelsonS. M.FrekoD. (1982). Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classifications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 37–50.
61.
MedinD. L.RossB. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction. In SternbergR. S. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62.
MedinD. L.SchafferM. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 355–368.
63.
NewellA. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
NosofskyR. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.
65.
NosofskyR. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3–27.
66.
PaivioA. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241–263.
67.
PaivioA. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
68.
PaivioA. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
69.
PaivioA.SmytheP. C.YuilleJ. C. (1968). Imagery versus meaningfulness of nouns in paired-associate learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 427–441.
70.
PecherD. (2013). Discourse comprehension. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 668–681). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
71.
PosnerM. I.KeeleS. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
72.
PouwW. T. J. L.van GogT.PaasF. (2014). An embedded and embodied cognitive review of instructional manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 51–72.
73.
PylyshynZ. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.
74.
PylyshynZ. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45.
75.
PylyshynZ. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 157–238.
76.
ReedS. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407.
77.
ReedS. K. (1974). Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual imagery. Memory & Cognition, 2, 329–336.
78.
ReedS. K. (2010). Thinking visually. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
79.
ReedS. K. (2016). Modeling human visuospatial reasoning with Soar/VIS. Manuscript submitted for publication.
80.
ReedS. K.JohnsenJ. A. (1975). Detection of parts in patterns and images. Memory & Cognition, 3, 569–575.
81.
RenklA. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–37.
Rittle-JohnsonB.StarJ. R.DurkinK. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 836–852.
84.
RogersT. T.PattersonK. (2007). Object categorization: Reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 451–469.
85.
RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
RubinD. C. (2007). The basic-systems model of episodic memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 277–311.
88.
SadoskiM.PaivioA. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding approach to reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
SchnotzW. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101–120.
90.
SchoolerJ. W.Engstler-SchoolerT. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 36–71.
91.
SchwanenflugelP. J.ShobenE. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82–102.
92.
SchwartzD. L.BlackJ. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457–497.
93.
SebestyenG. S. (1962). Decision-making processes in pattern recognition. New York, NY: Macmillan.
94.
SilverE. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 54–64.
95.
StanfieldR. A.ZwaanR. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.
96.
TulvingE. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In TulvingE.DonaldsonW. (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). New York, NY: Academic Press.
97.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (2012). Action identification theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HiggensE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 327–348). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98.
VandenBossG. R. (Ed.). (2006). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
99.
von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
100.
WangJ.ConderJ. A.BlitzerD. N.ShinkarevaS. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1459–1468.
101.
WasonP.ShapiroD. (1975). Natural and contrived experiences in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 63–71.
102.
WatsonJ. B. (1924). Behaviorism. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
103.
Weimer-HastingsK.XuX. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 719–736.
104.
ZwaanR. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
