AnicichE. M. (2014). What lies within: Superscripting references to reveal research trends. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 682–691.
2.
BraverS. L.ThoemmesF. J.RosenthalR. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342.
3.
BrownS. D.FurrowD.HillD. F.GableJ. C.PorterL. P.JacobsW. J. (2014). A duty to describe. Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 626–640.
4.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing Type S (sign) and Type M (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 641–651.
5.
LakensD.EversE. R. (2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 278–292.
6.
McShaneB. B.BöckenholtU. (2014). You cannot step into the same river twice: Why power analyses are optimistic. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 612–625.
7.
LedgerwoodA. (2014). Introduction to the special section on advancing our methods and practices. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 275–277.
8.
SakalukJ.WilliamsA.BiernatM. (2014). Analytic review as a solution to the misreporting of statistical results in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 652–660.
9.
SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2014). Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 666–681.
10.
SpellmanB. A. (2013). There is no such thing as replication, but we should do it anyway. European Journal of Personality, 27, 120–144.
11.
StanleyD. J.SpenceJ. R. (2014). Expectations for replication: Are yours realistic?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 305–318.
12.
TsujiS.BergmannC.CristiaA. (2014). Community-augmented meta-analyses: Toward cumulative data assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 661–665.
