BakkerM.van DijkA.WichertsJ. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543–554.
2.
BegleyC. G.EllisL. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483, 531–533.
3.
BemD. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 407–425.
4.
BraverS. L.ThoemmesF. J.RosenthalR. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342.
5.
ButtonK. S.IoannidisJ. P.MokryszC.NosekB. A.FlintJ.RobinsonE. S.MunafòM. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–376.
6.
CesarioJ. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 40–48.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
9.
EichE. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25, 3–6.
10.
FanelliD. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90, 891–904.
11.
FiedlerK.KutznerF.KruegerJ. I. (2012). The long way from a-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 661–669.
12.
GreenwaldA. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1–20.
13.
IoannidisJ. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.
14.
JohnL.LoewensteinG.PrelecD. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532.
15.
LakensD.EversE. (2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 9, 278–292.
16.
LeBelE. P.BorsboomD.Giner-SorollaR.HasselmanF.PetersK. R.RatliffK. A.SmithC. T. (2013). PsychDisclosure.org: Grassroots support for reforming reporting standards in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 424–432.
17.
LedgerwoodA.ShermanJ. W. (2012). Short, sweet, and problematic? The rise of the short report in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 60–66.
ManerJ. K. (2014). Let’s put our money where our mouth is: If authors are to change their ways, reviewers (and editors) must change with them. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 9, 343–351.
20.
MaxwellS. E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147–163.
MoonesingheR.KhouryM. J.JanssensA. C. J. (2007). Most published research findings are false—But a little replication goes a long way. PLoS Medicine, 4, e28.
23.
MurayamaK.PekrunR.FiedlerK. (2013). Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868313496330
24.
NosekB. A.SpiesJ. R.MotylM. (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631.
PashlerH.WagenmakersE. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–530.
27.
PeruginiM.GallucciM.CostantiniG. (2014). Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 9, 319–332.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
30.
RosenthalR.RubinD. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1, 377–386.
31.
SagarinB. J.AmblerJ. K.LeeE. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 293–304.
32.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.
33.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
34.
SpellmanB. A. (2013, September). Research revolution 2.0: Whence and whither? The view from a journal editor. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Berkeley, CA.
35.
StanleyD.SpenceJ. (2014). Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic?Perspectives in Psychological Science, 9, 305–318.
36.
StroebeW.StrackF. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59–71.
VulE.HarrisC.WinkielmanP.PashlerH. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274–290.
39.
WickerA. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.