CutlerB. L.PenrodS. D.MartensT. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629–637.
2.
DoyleJ. M. (2005). True witness. New York, NY: Palgrave.
3.
GarrettB. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
People of New York v. Jeffrey Williams, 830 N.Y.S. 2d 452 (2006).
6.
SchmechelR. S.O’TooleT. P.EasterlyC.LoftusE. F. (2006). Beyond the Ken: Testing juror’s understanding of eyewitness reliability evidence. Jurimetrics Journal, 46, 177–214.
7.
State of Arizona v. Chapple, 660 P. 2d 1208 (Ariz. 1983).
8.
State v. Henderson, 27 A. 3d 872 (N.J. 2011).
9.
SteblayN. K.LoftusE. F. (2013). Eyewitness identification and the legal system. In ShafirE. (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of policy (pp. 145–162). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Accuracy. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement (Research Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
WellsG. L.TurtleJ. W. (1986). Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 320–329.