Most people believe in the existence of empirically unverifiable gods. Despite apparent heterogeneity, people’s conceptions of their gods center on predictable themes. Gods are overwhelmingly represented as intentional agents with (more or less) humanlike mental lives. This article reviews converging evidence suggesting that this regularity in god concepts exists in part because the ability to represent gods emerges as a cognitive by-product of the human capability to perceive minds. Basic human mind-perception abilities both facilitate and constrain belief in gods, with profound implications for individual differences in religious beliefs, implicit representations of supernatural agents, and the varieties of nonreligious experience. Furthermore, people react similarly to both reminders of gods and cues of social surveillance (e.g., audiences or video cameras), leading to interesting consequences in the domains of prosocial behavior, socially desirable responding, and self-awareness. Converging evidence indicates that mind perception is both cause and consequence of many religious beliefs.
AllenK. M.BlascovichJ.TomakaJ.KelseyR. M. (1991). Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 582–589.
2.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M.EpleyN.EyreR. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576.
3.
ArgyleM.Beit-HallahmiB. (1975). The social psychology of religion. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4.
AtranS. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
AydinN.FischerP.FreyD. (2010). Turning to God in the face of ostracism: Effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742–753.
7.
Baron-CohenS. (1997). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Baron-CohenS. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254.
9.
Baron-CohenS.JolliffeT.MortimoreC.RobertsonM. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822.
10.
Baron-CohenS.KnickmeyerR. C.BelmonteM. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823.
11.
Baron-CohenS.LeslieA. M.FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind?”Cognition, 21, 37–46.
12.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175.
13.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–252.
14.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.SkinnerR.MartinJ.ClubleyE. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.
15.
BarrettJ. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religious belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 29–34.
16.
BarrettJ. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God?Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
17.
BarrettJ. L. (2008). Why Santa Claus is not a God. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 149–161.
18.
BarrettJ. L.KeilF. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247.
19.
BartschK.WellmanH. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
BatesonM.NettleD.RobertsG. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.
21.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
22.
BeilockS. L.CarrT. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101–105.
23.
BeringJ. M. (2002). The existential theory of mind. Review of General Psychology, 6, 3–24.
24.
BeringJ. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 453–498.
25.
BeringJ. M. (2011). The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York: W.W. Norton.
26.
BeringJ. M.BjorklundD. F. (2004). The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity. Developmental Psychology, 40, 217–233.
27.
BeringJ. M.McLeodK. A.ShackelfordT. K. (2005). Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature, 16, 60–81.
28.
BertenthalB. I.ProffittD. R.CuttingJ. E. (1984). Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 213–230.
29.
BloomP. (2004). Descartes’ baby. New York: Basic Books.
30.
BloomP. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–151.
31.
BouchardT. J.McGueM.LykkenD.TellegenA. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Genetic and environmental influences and personality correlates. Twin Research, 2, 88–98.
32.
BoyerP. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
BoyerP. (2003). Religious thought and behaviour as by- products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 119–124.
34.
BoyerP. (2008). Being human: Religion: Bound to believe?Nature, 455, 1038–1039.
35.
BurrisC. T.BatsonC. D.AltstaedtenM.StephensS. K. (1994). “What a friend…”: Loneliness as a motivator of intrinsic religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 326–334.
36.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 324–332.
37.
CastelliF.FrithC. D.HappéF.FrithU. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 1839–1849.
38.
CastelliF.HappéF.FrithU.FrithC. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage, 12, 314–325.
39.
ChudekM.BirchS.HenrichJ.BloomP. (2012). The body switching paradigm: Evidence of mind-body dualism in infants. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia.
40.
CrespiB. J.BadcockC. (2008). Psychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 284–320.
41.
DarleyJ. M.LataneB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.
42.
DawkinsR. (2006). The God delusion. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
43.
DennettD. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 568–570.
44.
DuvalT. S.DuvalV.MulilisJ. (1992). Effects of self-focus, discrepancy between self and standard, and outcome expectancy favorability on the tendency to match self to standard and withdraw. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 340–348.
45.
DuvalT. S.WicklundR. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.
46.
EdelmanB. (2009). Markets: Red light states: Who buys online adult entertainment?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 209–220.
47.
EisenbergN.LennonR. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.
48.
EpleyN.AkalisS.WaytzA.CacioppoJ. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114–120.
49.
EpleyN.ConverseB. A.DelboscA.MonteleoneG.CacioppoJ. (2009). Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 21533–21538.
50.
EpleyN.WaytzA. (2009). Mind perception. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindsayG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498–541). New York: Wiley.
51.
FederoffN.HarveyJ. (1976). Focus of attention, self-esteem and the attribution of causality. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 336–345.
52.
FlavellJ. H. (1986). The development of children’s knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41, 418–425.
53.
FrithU. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in Autism. Neuron, 32, 969–979.
54.
FrithU.FrithC. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 358, 459–473.
55.
GebauerJ. E.MaioG. R. (2012). The need to belong can motivate belief in God. Journal of Personality, 80, 465–501.
56.
GergelyG.CsibraG.NádasdyZ.BíróS. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193.
57.
GervaisW. M.HenrichJ. (2010). The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 383–389.
GervaisW. M.NorenzayanA. (2012b). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 298–302.
60.
GervaisW. M.WillardA.NorenzayanA.HenrichJ. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith: Why natural intuitions and memory biases are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41, 389–411.
61.
GovernJ. M.MarschL. A. (2002). Development and validation of the Situational Self-Awareness Scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 366–378.
62.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2010). Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 7–16.
63.
GuthrieS. (1993). Faces in the clouds. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
64.
HaleyK. J.FesslerD. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 245–256.
65.
HallJ. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.
66.
HamlinJ. K.HallinanE. V.WoodwardA. L. (2008). Do as I do: 7-month-old infants selectively reproduce others’ goals. Developmental Science, 11, 487–494.
67.
HarrisP. L.KoenigM. A. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505–524.
68.
HenrichJ. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution & Human Behavior, 30, 244–260.
69.
HenrichJ.EnsimgerJ.McElreathR.BarrA.BarrettC.BolyanatzA.. . . ZikerJ. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327, 1480–1484.
70.
HenrichN. S.HenrichJ. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
71.
HughesC.CuttingA. L. (1999). Nature, nurture, and individual differences in early understanding of mind. Psychological Science, 10, 429–432.
72.
IngrahmA. G.LevingerG.GravesJ.PeckhamV. (1974). The Ringalmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371–384.
73.
JacksonJ. M.WilliamsK. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937–942.
JohnsonD. D. P.BeringJ. M. (2006). Hand of God, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 219–233.
76.
KapogiannisD.BarbeyA. K.SuM.ZamboniG.KruegerF.GrafmanJ. (2009). Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 4876–4881.
77.
KayA. C.GaucherD.McGregorI.NashK. (2010). Religious conviction as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 37–48.
78.
KayA. C.ShepherdS.BlatzC. W.ChuaS. N.GalinskyA. D. (2010). For God (or) country: The hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 725–773.
79.
KelemenD. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists?” Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.
80.
KelemenD.RossetE. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138–143.
81.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1999). Toward an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 921–952.
82.
KrollJ.SheehanW. (1989). Religious beliefs and practices among 52 psychiatric inpatients in Minnesota. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 67–72.
83.
KruegerJ.ClementR. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
84.
KrupkaE.WeberR. A. (2009). The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 307–320.
85.
LaneJ. D.WellmanH.EvansE. M. (2010). Children’s understanding of ordinary and extraordinary minds. Child Development, 81, 1475–1489.
86.
LaneJ. D.WellmanH.EvansE. M. (2012). Sociocultural input facilitates children’s developing understanding of extraordinary minds. Child Development, 83, 1007–1021.
87.
LanmanJ. A. (2012). The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27, 49–65.
88.
LegersteeM. (1991). The role of person and object in eliciting early imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 423–433.
89.
LenskiG. E. (1953). Social correlates of religious interest. American Sociological Review, 18, 533–544.
90.
MalhotraD. (2008). (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday effect” on pro-social behavior (HBS Working Paper 09-066). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
91.
MalleB. F.HodgesS. D. (Eds.). (2005). Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other. New York: Guilford.
92.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.SchallerM. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55.
93.
McCauleyR. N. (2000). The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness of science. In KeilF. C.WilsonR. A. (Ed.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 61–86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94.
McKayR. T.DennettD. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 493–561.
95.
MeltzoffA. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838–850.
96.
MillerA. S.HoffmanJ. (1995). Risk and religion: An explanation of gender differences in religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 63–75.
97.
MillerA. S.StarkR. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved?American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399–1423.
98.
NorenzayanA.GervaisW. M. (2012). The cultural evolution of religion. In SlingerlandE.CollardM. (Eds.), Creating consilience: Integrating the science and the humanities (pp. 243–265). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
99.
NorenzayanA.GervaisW. M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 20–25.
100.
NorenzayanA.GervaisW. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS ONE, 7, e36880.
101.
NorenzayanA.ShariffA. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
102.
PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.SeliP.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346.
103.
PernerJ.LeekamS. R.WimmerH. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125–137.
104.
PiazzaJ.BeringJ. M.IngramG. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 311–320.
105.
PichonI.BoccatoG.SaroglouV. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045.
106.
PremackD.WoodruffG. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.
107.
PyysiäinenI. (2001). How religion works. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
108.
Randolph-SengB.NielsenM. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303–315.
109.
ReynoldsW. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.
110.
RoesF. L.RaymondM. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution & Human Behavior, 24, 126–135.
111.
RokachA.BrockH. (1998). Coping with loneliness. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132, 107–127.
112.
SavitskyK.GilovichT. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 618–625.
SchjødtU.Stødkilde-JørgensenH.GeertzA. W.RoepstorffA. (2009). Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 199–207.
115.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.
116.
ShenhavA.RandD. G.GreeneJ. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
117.
SiddleR.HaddockG.TarrierN.FaragherE. B. (2002). Religious delusions in patients admitted to hospital with schizophrenia. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37, 130–138.
118.
SlingerlandE.ChudekM. (2011). The prevalence of mind-body dualism in early China. Cognitive Science, 35, 997–1007.
119.
SproullL.SubramaniR.KieslerS.WalkerJ.WatersK. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 97–124.
120.
SripadaC. S.StitchS. (2005). A framework for the psychology of norms. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Volume 2: Culture and cognition (p. 280–301). New York: Oxford University Press.
121.
StillerJ.DunbarR. I. M. (2007). Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29, 93–104.
122.
TriplettN. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.
123.
TwengeJ. M.CataneseK. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 409–423.
124.
WallerN. G.KojetinB. A.BouchardT. J.LykkenD. T.TellegenA. (1990). Genetic and environmental influences on religious interests, attitudes, and values: A study of twins reared apart and together. Psychological Science, 1, 1–5.
125.
WaytzA.GrayK.EpleyN.WegnerD. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 383–388.
126.
WaytzA.MorewedgeC. K.EpleyN.MonteleoneG.GaoJ.-H.CacioppoJ. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 410–435.
127.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism: The kiss of social death. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 236–247.
128.
WimmerH.PernerJ. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
129.
WoodwardA. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34.
130.
ZajoncR. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.
131.
ZuckermanP. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In MartinM. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–65). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
132.
ZuckermanP. (2008). Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York: New York University Press.
