A Tale of Two Systems

Baddeley A. (2012). Working memory: Models, theories, and controversies. Annual Review, 63, 1–29.

Barsalou L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol system. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22, 577–660.

Barsalou L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562.

Chater N. (2003). How much can we learn from double dissociations. Cortex, 39, 167–169.

Dawes R. (1999). A message from psychologists to Economists: Mere predictability does not matter like it should (without a good story appended to it). Journal of Economic Behavior & Organizations, 39, 29–40.

Eitam B. Hassin R. R. Schul Y. (2008). Non-conscious goal pursuit in novel environments: The case of implicit learning. Psychological Science, 19, 261–267.

Eitam B. Schul Y. Hassin R. R. (2009). Goal-relevance and artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental psychology, 62, 228–238.

Evans J. St. J. B. T. (2009). How many dual-process theories do we need: One, two or many? In Evans J. St. B. T. Frankish K. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 31–54). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Evans J. St. J. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313–326.

Evans J. St. J. B. T. (2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Facts and fallacies. In Holyoak K. Morrison R. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Evans J. St. J. B. T. Barston J. L. Pollard P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295–306.

Evans J. St. J. B. T. Curtis-Holmes J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 382–389.

Evans J. St. B. T. Stanovich K. E. (2013). Dual process theories of cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.

Fiedler K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere—not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163–171.

Fodor J. (2001). The mind does not work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gigerenzer G. Reiger T. (1996). How do we tell an association from a rule? Comment on Sloman (1996). Psychological Bulletin, 119, 23–26.

Gold I. Stoljar D. (1999). A neuron doctrine in the philosophy of neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 809–830.

Hackenbracht J. Tamir M. (2010). Preferences for sadness when eliciting help: Instrumental motives in sadness regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 306–315.

Hassin R. R. Bargh J. A. Engell A. D. McCulloch K. C. (2009). Implicit working memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 665–678.

Henson R. (2006). Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: Dissocations versus associations. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 64–69.

Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kareev Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlation. Psychological Review, 107, 397–402.

Kareev Y. (2005). And yet the small-sample effect does hold: Reply to Juslin and Olsson (2005) and Anderson, Doherty, Berg, and Friedrich (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 280–285.

Keren G. Schul Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533–550.

Kruglanski A. W. Gigerenzer G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberative judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97–109.

Lieberman M. D. (2009). What zombies can’t do: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the irreducibility of reflective consciousness. In Evans J. St. B. T. Frankish K. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 293–316). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Navon D. (1984). Resources—A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234.

Newstead S. E. (2000). Are there two different types of thinking? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 690–691.

Oberman L. M. Ramachandran V. S. (2007). The simulating social mind: The role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 310–327.

Osman M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 988–1010.

Poldrack R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.

Roberts S. A. Pashler H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107, 359–367.

Shah A. Miyake P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Stanovich K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In Evans J. St. B. T. Frankish K. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Stanovich K. E. Toplak M. E. (2011). Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11, 3–13.

Tamir M. Ford B. Q. (2009). Choosing to be afraid: Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion, 9, 488–497.

Thompson V. A. Newstead S. E. Morley N. J. (2011). Methodological and theoretical issues in belief bias: Implications for dual-process theories. In Manktelow K. Over D. Elqayam S. (Eds.), The science of reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St. B. T. Evans (pp. 309–338). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Vul E. Harris C. Winkielman P. Pashler H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274–290.

Wagenmakers E.-J. Wetzels R. Borsboom D. van der Maas H. L. J. Kievit R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 632–638.

Yarkoni T. (2009). Big correlations in little studies: Inflated fMRI correlations reflect low statistical power—Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 294–298.