BlumsteinS. E.AmsoD. (2013). Dynamic functional organization of language: Insights from functional neuroimaging. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 44–48.
2.
CabezaR.MoscovitchM. (2013). Memory systems, processing modes, and components: Functional neuroimaging evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 49–55.
3.
ChiaoJ. Y.Immordino-YangM. H. (2013). Modularity and the cultural mind: Contributions of cultural neuroscience to cognitive theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 56–61.
4.
ChurchlandP. S.SejnowskiT. J. (1988). Perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Science, 242, 741–745.
5.
ColtheartM. (2006). What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)? (Position Paper Presented to the European Cognitive Neuropsychology Workshop, Bressanone, 2005). Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 42, 323–331.
6.
ColtheartM. (2013). How can functional neuroimaging inform cognitive theories?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 98–103.
7.
DienerE. (2010). Neuroimaging: Voodoo, new phrenology, or scientific breakthrough? Introduction to special section on fMRI. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 714–715.
8.
DobbsD. (2005, March24). Fact or phrenology?Scientific American Mind, pp. 24–31.
9.
EngelS. A.RumelhartD. E.WandellB. A.LeeA. T.GloverG. H.ChichilniskyE. J.ShadlenM. N. (1994). fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature, 369, 525.
10.
FarahM. J.HookC. J. (2013). The seductive allure of “seductive allure.”Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 88–90.
11.
FrahmJ.MerboldtK. D.HanickeW. (1993). Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 29, 139–144.
12.
KennedyD. (2005). Neuroimaging: Revolutionary research tool or a post-modern phrenology?The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 19.
13.
KwongK. K.BelliveauJ. W.CheslerD. A.GoldbergI. E.WeisskoffR. M.PonceletB. P.TurnerR. (1992). Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 5675–5679.
14.
LevyB. J.WagnerA. D. (2013). Measuring memory reactivation with functional MRI: Implications for psychological theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 72–78.
15.
MatherM.CacioppoJ. T.KanwisherN. (2013). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 108–113.
16.
O’CravenK. M.RosenB. R.KwongK. K.TreismanA.SavoyR. L. (1997). Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST. Neuron, 18, 591–598.
17.
PageM. P. A. (2006). What can’t functional neuroimaging tell the cognitive psychologist?Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 42, 428–443.
18.
ParkD. C.McDonoughI. M. (2013). The dynamic aging mind: Revelations from functional neuroimaging research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 62–67.
19.
Reuter-LorenzP. A. (2013). Aging and cognitive neuroimaging: A fertile union. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 68–71.
20.
RuggM. D.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2013). Moving forward with fMRI data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 84–87.
21.
TootellR. B. H.ReppasJ. B.DaleA. M.LookR. B.SerenoM. I.MalachR.. . . RosenB. R. (1995). Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature, 375, 139–141.
22.
UttalW. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
WagerT. D.AtlasL. Y. (2013). How is pain influenced by cognition? Neuroimaging weighs in. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 91–97.
24.
WhiteC. N.PoldrackR. A. (2013). Using fMRI to constrain theories of cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 79–83.
25.
WixtedJ. T.MickesL. (2013). On the relationship between fMRI and theories of cognition: The arrow points in both directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 104–107.