B. F. Skinner is consistently rated as one of the most important figures in the history of psychology. Much has been said about his character, some of it strongly negative. Yet little is known about what kind of man he really was. Drawing on information from published sources, archival material, and people who knew him, we used “blind” raters to assess Skinner’s score on the Big Five personality factors. We found that Skinner was a highly conscientious man and highly open to experience. He was also somewhat neurotic and somewhat extraverted but neither agreeable nor disagreeable. The resulting personality profile was compared with meta-analytic results concerning scientists versus nonscientists, creative scientists versus noncreative scientists, and artists versus nonartists. In general, Skinner’s personality profile was consistent with findings regarding those of other notable scientists.
AgnewS. T. (1972, January). Agnew’s blast at behaviorism. Psychology Today, pp. 4, 84, 87.
2.
AkramiN.EkehammarB. (2006). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in Big-Five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 117–126.
American Psychological Association. (1958). Distinguished scientific contribution award. American Psychologist, 13, 735–738.
5.
ArntzenE.LokkeJ.LokkeG.EilertsenD. E. (2010). On misconceptions about behavior analysis among university students and teachers. The Psychological Record, 60, 325–336.
6.
BallD.HillL.FreemanB.EleyT.StrelauJ.RiemannR. . . .PlominR. (1997). The serotonin transporter gene and peer-rated neuroticism. NeuroReport, 8, 1301–1304.
7.
BarbaranelliC.FidaR.PacielloM.Di GiuntaL.CapraraG. V. (2008). Assessing personality in early adolescence through self-report and other-ratings a multitrait-multimethod analysis of the BFQ-C. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 876–886.
8.
BecharaA.DamasioA. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336–372.
9.
BjorkD. W. (1993). B.F. Skinner: A life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BoringE. G. (1940). Was this analysis a success?Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 35, 4–10.
11.
BoringE. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12.
BoudreauJ. W.BoswellW. R.JudgeT. A. (2001). Effects of personality on executive career success in the United States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 53–58.
BrennanR. L.PredigerD. J. (1981). Coefficient Kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687–699.
15.
CassandroV. J.SimontonD. K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 1–18.
16.
CattellR. B. (1963). The personality and motivation of the researcher from measurements of contemporaries and from biography. In TaylorC. W.BarronF. (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 119–131). New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
ChomskyN. (1971, December30). The case against B.F. Skinner. The New York Review of Books, 17. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/
18.
ColeS. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences?American Journal of Sociology, 89, 111–139.
19.
ColemanS. R. (1985). When historians disagree: B.F. Skinner and E.G. Boring, 1930. The Psychological Record, 35, 301–314.
20.
CorrP. J.MatthewsG. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of personality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DarwinC. (1879). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (2nd ed.). London, England: John Murray.
22.
DunbarR. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London, England: Faber.
23.
ElliottT.TyrerP.HorwoodJ.FergussonD. (2011). Assessment of abnormal personality in childhood: A Delphi survey of questionnaire data. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 89–100.
24.
EpsteinR. (1997). Skinner as self-manager. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 545–568.
25.
EpsteinR.LanzaR. P.SkinnerB. F. (1980). Symbolic communication between two pigeons. Science, 207, 543–545.
26.
EpsteinR.LanzaR. P.SkinnerB. F. (1981). “Self-awareness” in the pigeon. Science, 212, 695–696.
27.
FeistG. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4, 366–371.
28.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.
29.
FeistG. J. (2006). How development and personality influence scientific thought, interest, and achievement. Review of General Psychology, 10, 163–182.
30.
FeistG. J.BarronF. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.
31.
FersterC. B. (1970). Schedules of reinforcement with Skinner. In DewsP. B. (Ed.), Festschrift for B.F. Skinner (pp. 37–46). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32.
GandhiM. K. (1927–1929). Autobiography: The story of my experiments with truth. Thousand Oaks, CA: BN Publishing.
33.
GrandinT.JohnsonC. (2005). Animals in translation: Using the mysteries of autism to decode animal behavior. New York, NY: Scribner.
34.
HaggbloomS. J.WarnickR.WarnickJ. E.JonesV. K.YarbroughG. L.RussellT. M. . . .MonteE. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6, 139–152.
35.
HardyG. H. (1992). A mathematician’s apology (Canto edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1940)
36.
HastieR.KumarP. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25–38.
37.
HeiderJ. D.SchererC. R.SkowronskiJ. J.WoodS. E.EdlundJ. E.HartnettJ. L. (2007). Trait expectancies and stereotype expectancies have the same effect on person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 265–272.
38.
HergenhahnB. R. (1982). An introduction to theories of learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
HilgardE. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A historical survey. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
40.
HoeferM. L.WarnickE.KnappT. J. (2003). Contributions to the history of psychology: CXVII. Who’s who in American psychology: A citation study of introductory psychology textbooks. Psychological Reports, 93, 186–190.
JohnO. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and questionnaires. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
KellerF. S. (1970). Psychology at Harvard (1926-1931), a reminiscence. In DewsP. B. (Ed.), Festschrift for B.F. Skinner (pp. 29–36). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
44.
KellerF. S. (1990). Burrhus Frederic Skinner (1904-1990) (A thank-you). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 155–158.
45.
KellerF. S. (1991). Burrhus Frederic Skinner (1904-1990). Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 27, 3–6.
46.
KingL. A.WalkerL. M.BroylesS. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.
47.
KoY.KimJ. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251–261.
48.
LudwigA. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
McCraeR. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.
50.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.
52.
NettleD. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.
53.
NettleD. (2007). Personality: What makes you the way you are. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
54.
NortonM. I.FrostJ. H.ArielyD. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 97–105.
55.
OverskeidG. (2007). Looking for Skinner and finding Freud. American Psychologist, 62, 590–595.
56.
PiedmontR. L. (1998). Profile analysis using the NEO PI-R. In PiedmontR. L. (Ed.), The revised NEO Personality Inventory: Clinical and research applications (pp. 113–164). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
57.
PostF. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: A study of 291 world-famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 22–34.
58.
Ramón y CajalS. (1999). Advice for a young investigator (SwansonN.SwansonL. W., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1897)
59.
RandA. (1982). Philosophy: Who needs it. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
60.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.
Root-BernsteinR. S.AllenL.BeachL.BhadulaR.FastJ.HoseyC.WeinlanderS. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members. Journal of the Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 51–63.
63.
Root-BernsteinR. S.BernsteinM.GarnierH. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 115–137.
64.
RudnytskyP. L. (2008). Inventing Freud. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 68, 117–127.
65.
RuncoM. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
66.
RushtonJ. P. (1990). Creativity, intelligence, and psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1291–1298.
67.
RutherfordA. (2003). B.F. Skinner and the auditory inkblot: The rise and fall of the verbal summator as a projective technique. History of Psychology, 6, 362–378.
68.
Saint Augustine. (1961). Confessions (Pine-CoffinR.S.Trans.). London, England: Penguin. (Original work published 398)
69.
SimontonD. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
70.
SkinnerB. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
71.
SkinnerB. F. (1939). The alliteration in Shakespeare’s sonnets: A study in literary behavior. The Psychological Record, 3, 186–192.
72.
SkinnerB. F. (1942). A quantitative estimate of certain types of sound-patterning in poetry. American Journal of Psychology, 30, 64–79.
73.
SkinnerB. F. (1948). Walden Two. New York, NY: Macmillan.
74.
SkinnerB. F. (1967). B.F. Skinner. In BoringE. G.LindzeyG. (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 387–413). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
75.
SkinnerB. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
76.
SkinnerB. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Knopf.
77.
SkinnerB. F. (1976). Particulars of my life. New York, NY: Knopf.
78.
SkinnerB. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist: Part two of an autobiography. New York, NY: Knopf.
79.
SkinnerB. F. (1983). A matter of consequences: Part three of an autobiography. New York, NY: Knopf.
80.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2009). Surprising emotions. Science, 323, 215–216.
81.
SmithL. D. (1996). Situating B.F. Skinner and behaviorism in American culture. In SmithL. D.WoodwardW. R. (Eds.), B.F. Skinner and behaviorism in American culture (pp. 294–315). Cranberry, NJ: Associated University Presses.
82.
SmithN. G.MorrisE. K. (2004). A tribute to B.F. Skinner at 100: His awards and honors. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 5, 121–128.
83.
SongA. V.SimontonD. K. (2007). Studying personality at a distance: Quantitative methods. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 308–321). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
84.
SterbaR. (1961). On the personality of Sigmund Freud. American Imago, 18, 289–304.
85.
Tape recording concerning personality characteristics of B.F. Skinner. (n.d.). Papers of Burrhus Frederic Skinner, 1928-1979 (HUGBS 485.95). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Archives.
86.
TermanL. M. (1954). Scientists and nonscientists in a group of 800 gifted men. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 68(7, Whole No. 378), 1–44.
87.
ThagardP. (2005). How to be a successful scientist. In GormanM. E.TweneyR. D.GoodingD. C.KincannonA. P. (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 159–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88.
VargasJ. S. (1990). B. F. Skinner—The last few days. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 409–410.
89.
VargasJ. S. (2004). A daughter’s retrospective of B. F. Skinner. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 7, 135–140.
WarrensM. (2010). Inequalities between multi-rater kappas. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 4, 271–286.
92.
WestenD. (2007). The political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
93.
WhiteR. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460–489.
94.
WienerD. N. (1992). Contributions to the history of psychology: LXXXVIII. Skinner at 86—An appreciation. Psychological Reports, 70, 1023–1026.
95.
WienerD. N. (1996). B.F. Skinner: Benign anarchist. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
96.
WinterD. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196–202.
97.
WittelsF. (1924). Sigmund Freud: His personality, his teaching and his school (PaulE.PaulC., Trans.). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
98.
WolfensteinM.TrullT. J. (1997). Depression and openness to experience. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 614–632.
99.
WyattW. J. (2000). Behavioral science in the crosshairs: The FBI file on B.F. Skinner. Behavior and Social Issues, 10, 101–109.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
