BakkerM.WichertsJ. M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 666–678. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0089-510.3758/s13428-011-0089-5
2.
FiedlerK. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere—Not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163–171. doi:10.1177/174569161140023710.1177/1745691611400237
3.
IoannidisJ. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.002012410.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
4.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.63810.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
5.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False- positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/095679761141763210.1177/0956797611417632
6.
VulE.HarrisC.WinkielmanP.PashlerH. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x
