In this reply to the comments on our original article, we identify common themes and respond to some specific issues that appear to be at the core of the debate over the evidence for “Generation Me.” In particular, we point out that generational studies have both applied and theoretical consequences and echo the sentiment that developmental considerations are likely to be more important than generational considerations when thinking about the attributes of today's young people. We also acknowledge that disagreements are inevitable, as this is a controversial issue of study. However, we reiterate our commitment to the interpretation of effect sizes rather than null hypothesis significance testing and emphasize the need for care when psychological scientists offer broad and often moralistic pronouncements about entire generations of young people.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development for the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
3.
Arnett, J.J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Arnett, J.J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for ? Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68-73.
5.
Arnett, J.J. (2010). Oh, grow up! Generational grumbling and the new life stage of emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 89-92.
6.
Blonigen, D.M., Carlson, M.D., Hicks, B.M., Krueger, R.F., & Iacono, W.G. (2008). Stability and change in personality traits from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Journal of Personality, 76, 229-266.
7.
Brown, R.P., Budzek, K., & Tamborski, M. (2009). On the meaning of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 951-964.
8.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R.L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
11.
Donnellan, M.B., Conger, R.D., & Burzette, R.G. (2007). Personality development from late adolescence to young adulthood: Differential stability, normative maturity, and evidence for the maturity-stability hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 75, 237-263.
12.
Donnellan, M.B., & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2009). How should we study generational change-or should we? A critical examination of the evidence for “Generation Me.”Social and Personality Compass, 3, 1-10.
13.
Donnellan, M.B., Trzesniewski, K.H., & Robins, R.W. (2009). An emerging epidemic of narcissism or much ado about nothing? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 498-501.
14.
Eckersley, R. (2010). Comment: A transdisciplinary perspective on young people's well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 76-80.
15.
Eibach, R.P., & Libby, L.K. (2008). Ideology of the good old days: Exaggerated perceptions of moral decline and conservative politics. In J.T. Jost, A. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 402- 426). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Eibach, R.P., Libby, L.K., & Gilovich, T.D. (2003). When change in the self is mistaken for change in the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 917-931.
17.
Ferguson, C.J. (2008). The school shooting/violent video game link: Causal link or moral panic? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 25-37.
18.
Ferguson, C.J. (in press). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
19.
Foster, J.D., Campbell, W.K., & Twenge, J.M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the life span and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 469-486.
20.
Fraley, R.C., & Marks, M.J. (2007). The null hypothesis significance-testing debate and its implications for personality research. In R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, & R.F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 149-169). New York: Guilford Press.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M.R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.
23.
Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., & Schulenberg, J.E. (2009). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2008: Vol. I. Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 09-7402). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
24.
Kashy, D.A., Donnellan, M.B., Ackerman, R.A., & Russell, D.A. (2009). Reporting and interpreting research in PSPB: Practices, principles, and pragmatics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1131-1142.
25.
Kline, R.B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
Lenzenweger, M.F. (2008). Epidemiology of personality disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31, 395-403.
27.
Lenzenweger, M.F., Lane, M.C., Loranger, A.W., & Kessler, R.C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 553-564.
28.
Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 857-861.
29.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
30.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of personality. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159-181). New York: Guilford Press.
31.
Pincus, A.L., Ansell, E.B., Pimentel, C.A., Cain, N.M., Wright, A.G.C., & Levy, K.N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365-379.
32.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
33.
Roberts, B.W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T.E. (2001). The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 670-683.
34.
Roberts, B.W., Edmonds, G., & Grijalva, E. (2010). It is Developmental Me not Generation Me: Developmental changes are more important than generational changes in narcissism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 97-102.
35.
Roberts, B.W., Walton, K.E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life-course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25.
36.
Sackett, P.S., & Mavor, A.S. (Eds.). (2003). Attitudes, aptitudes, and aspirations of American youth: Implications for military recruitment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
37.
Terracciano, A. (2010). Secular trends and personality: Perspective from longitudinal and cross cultural studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 93-96.
38.
Trzesniewski, K.H., & Donnellan, M.B. (2009). Re-evaluating the evidence for increasing self views among high school students: More evidence for consistency across generations (1976-2006). Psychological Science, 20, 920-922.
39.
Trzesniewski, K.H., Donnellan, M.B., & Robins, R.W. (2008). Is “Generation Me” really more narcissistic than previous generations? Journal of Personality, 76, 903-917.
40.
Twenge, J.M. (2006). Generation Me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled-and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.
41.
Twenge, J.M., & Campbell, W.K. (2010). Birth cohort differences in the Monitoring the Future dataset and elsewhere: Further evidence for Generation Me. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 81-88.
42.
Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972-2004: An age period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73, 204-226.
