Armed Forces veterans in the United Kingdom (UK) experience complex physical, psychological, and social needs shaped by military service. Civilian healthcare services often lack cultural competence, relational continuity, and organisational structures that translate veteran identification into coordinated assessment, referral, and follow-up, contributing to reduced help-seeking, delayed disclosure, and moral distress.
Aims:
To synthesise UK evidence on veterans’ experiences in civilian healthcare and identify strategies aligned with the Nursing and Midwifery Council Code (2018) and UK legal duties to strengthen adult nurses’ capacity for culturally responsive care.
Methods:
An integrative review of five UK primary studies was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl’s framework. A multi-database search was undertaken, and studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist and the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Thematic synthesis was guided by Military Transition Theory, trauma-informed care principles, and the person-centred nursing framework.
Results:
Three themes were identified: transition and identity disruption; stigma and low military cultural competence deterring disclosure; and gaps in veteran identification, training and trauma-informed practice. National initiatives improved recognition but did not sustain relational continuity.
Conclusions:
Veteran-focused continuing professional development, Veteran Link Nurse roles and structured reflective practice may strengthen cultural competence, ethical resilience, and delivery of veteran-centred care.
AhmedSK (2024) Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and Strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health5: 100171. DOI: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171.
2.
AlcornKSMcCordSKSeedSM, et al. (2022) The veteran-centered care conferences: interprofessional education and community involvement facilitated by the health sciences librarian. Journal of the Medical Library Association110: 365–371. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1491.
3.
AllenDSpencerGMcEwanK, et al. (2020) The Schwartz Centre rounds: Supporting mental health workers with the emotional impact of their work. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing29: 942–952. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12729.
4.
AlsufyaniABakerOAlsufyaniY (2020) Consequences of emotional intelligence in nursing: a concept analysis. Erbil Journal of Nursing and Midwifery3: 82–90. DOI: 10.15218/ejnm.2020.10.
5.
AlyafeiACarrRE (2024) The Health Belief Model of Behavior Change. National Library of Medicine. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606120/ (accessed 15 February 2025).
6.
AveyardH (2019) Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide, 4th edn.London: Open University Press.
7.
BeauchampTLChildressJF (2019) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 8th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3: 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11: 589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
10.
Brooke-HollandLMillsC (2024) Parliament’s role in giving consent; Duration of the Armed Forces Act 2021; What happens if the legislation does not pass? Research Briefing. House of Commons Library. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10065/CBP-10065.pdf (accessed 5 December 2024).
EckerAHCullyJACucciareMA, et al. (2023) Patient and provider perspectives on treating substance use disorder and co-occurring anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorders in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system. Journal of Veterans Studies9(1): 72–84. DOI: 10.21061/jvs.v9i1.403.
17.
EdwardsMPMcClementSEReadLR (2013) Nurses’ responses to initial moral distress in long-term care. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry10(3): 325–336. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-013-9463-6.
18.
EllisP (2022) Understanding Research for Nursing Students, 5th edn.London: Sage.
19.
EngelGL (1977) The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science196: 129–136. DOI: 10.1126/science.847460.
20.
Fineout-OverholtEJohnstonL (2005) Teaching EBP: The PICO Question – a Technique for Developing Patient-Centered Questions. Evidence-Based Practice8: 25–26.
21.
FinneganAJacksonRSimpsonR (2018) Finding the forgotten: motivating military veterans to register with a primary healthcare practice. Military Medicine183:e509–e517. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy086.
22.
FinneganARandlesR (2023) Where are all the veterans? A mixed methods assessment of a systematic strategy to increase veteran registration in UK primary healthcare practices. BMJ Open13: e068904–e068904. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068904.
23.
FinneganAPDi LemmaLMoorhouseI, et al. (2020) Educating nurses to deliver optimum care to military veterans and their families. Nurse Education in Practice42: 102654. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102654.
24.
FullwoodD (2015) Understanding and managing the health needs of veterans. Nursing Standard30:37–43. DOI: 10.7748/ns.30.10.37.s46.
25.
FultonEWildDHancockJ, et al. (2018) Transition from service to civvy street: The needs of armed forces veterans and their families in the UK. Perspectives in Public Health139: 49–58. DOI: 10.1177/1757913918785650.
26.
GoodrichJ (2012) Supporting hospital staff to provide compassionate care: Do Schwartz Center Rounds work in English hospitals?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine105: 117–122. DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110183.
27.
GordonKBurnellKWilsonC (2020) Outside the military ‘bubble’: Life after service for UK ex-armed forces personnel. Frontiers in Public Health8: 338. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00338.
28.
GreenhalghTPeacockR (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.)331: 1064–5. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
29.
GubaEGLincolnYS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 105–117.
30.
HitchCTonerPArmourC (2023) Enablers and barriers to military veterans seeking help for mental health and alcohol difficulties: A systematic review of the quantitative evidence. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy28: 135581962211499. DOI: 10.1177/13558196221149930.
KleykampMMontgomerySPangA, et al. (2021) Military identity and planning for the transition out of the military. Military Psychology33: 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1962176.
MelnykBMFineout-OverholtE (2023) Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare:A Guide to Best Practice, 5th edn.Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
35.
MethleyAMCampbellSChew-GrahamC, et al. (2014) PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research14: 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) (2018) The code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for nurses, Midwives and Nursing Associates. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Available at: https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code/ (accessed 13 February 2025).
44.
O’ConnorCJoffeH (2020) Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods19: 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/1609406921990206.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPMBoutronI, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
48.
PolitDBeckCT (2022) Essentials of Nursing Research, 10th edn.Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, p. 2.
49.
RichardsonWSWilsonMCNishikawaJ, et al. (1995) The well-built Clinical Question: A Key to evidence-based decisions. ACP Journal Club123. DOI: 10.7326/acpjc-1995-123-3-a12.
50.
RosenstockIM (1974) The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs2:354–386. DOI: 10.1177/109019817400200405.
51.
ShawWH (2016) Utilitarianism and the Ethics of War. Abingdon, Oxon, New: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203538333.
TennantJPRoss-HellauerT (2020) The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review5: 1–18. DOI: 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1.
WhittemoreRKnaflK (2005) The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing52: 546–553. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
58.
WilliamsonVGreenbergNStevelinkSAM (2019) Perceived stigma and barriers to care in UK Armed Forces personnel and veterans with and without probable mental disorders. BMC Psychology7. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0351-7.
59.
WilliamsonVMurphyDPhelpsA, et al. (2021) Moral injury: The effect on mental health and implications for treatment. The Lancet Psychiatry8. DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00113-9.
60.
World Medical Association (2024) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA331(4): 285–286. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.23015.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
