Chronic illness care is an important factor for health promotion in diabetes since it affects health outcomes such as quality of life.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care and the quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients.
Methods:
The study used a cross-sectional and correlational design. The sample included 317 patients with type 2 diabetes. A socio-demographic and disease-related questionnaire form, the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scale and the WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Scale were used to collect data.
Results:
According to the regression analysis, the stronger predictor affecting all domains of quality of life was the overall PACIC. This study demonstrated the importance of satisfaction level of chronic illness care in the improvement of quality of life. Therefore, the factors affecting the satisfaction level with chronic care services should be determined to improve the quality of life of patients. In addition, healthcare based on the chronic-care model should be provided in the care of the patients.
Conclusions:
PACIC had an important effect on quality of life of the patients. This study demonstrated the importance of satisfaction level on chronic illness care in the improvement of quality of life.
Almeida-BrasilCCSilveiraMRSilvaKR, et al (2017) Quality of life and associated characteristics: of WHOQOL-BREEF in the context of primary Health Care. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva22:1705–1716.
2.
American Diabetes Association (2019) Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care42: 1–194.
3.
AragonesASchaeferEWStevensD, et al. (2008) Validation of the Spanish translation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey. Preventing Chronic Disease5: 1–10.
4.
AryaniFMYLeeSWHChuaSS, et al. (2016) Chronic care model in primary care: Can it improve health-related quality of life?Integrated Pharmacy Research & Practice5: 11–17.
5.
AungEOstiniRDowerJ, et al. (2016). Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in type 2 diabetes: A longitudinal study. Evaluation & The Health Professions39: 185–203.
6.
AzevedoALSDSilvaRADTomasiE, et al. (2013) Doenças crônicas e qualidade de vida na atenção primária à saúde. Cadernos Saude Publica29: 1774–1782.
7.
BaptistaDRWiensAPontaroloR, et al. (2016) The chronic care model for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome8: 1–7.
8.
BongaertsBWMüssigKWensJ, et al. (2017) Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal Open7: e013076.
9.
BoussageonRGueyffierFCornuC (2014) Effects of pharmacological treatments on micro-and macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes: What is the level of evidence?Diabetes & Metabolism40:169–175.
10.
CrammJMNieboerAP (2012) Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes10: 1–7.
11.
DavyCBleaselJLiuH, et al. (2015) Effectiveness of chronic care models: Opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research15: 1–11.
12.
Dinç HorasanGTarı SelçukKSakaryaS, et al (2019) Health-related quality of life and perceived health status of Turkish population. Quality of Life Research28: 2099–2109.
13.
DoğanMDÇadırlıŞPaçaçıM, et al. (2019) Care satisfaction and training requirements in patient with chronic disease. Health and Nursing Management Journal1: 22–28.
14.
EserEFidanerHFidanerC, et al. (1999) Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF. Psychiatry, Psychology, Psychopharmacology7: 23–40.
15.
Garcia RodriguesMMonteiro SoaresMRodriguesJD, et al (2021) Quality of life of parents with children with congenital abnormalities: A systematic review with meta-analysis of assessment methods and levels of quality of life. Quality of Life Research31: 991–1011
16.
GeymanJP (2007) Disease management: Panacea, another false hope, or something in between. Annals of Family Medicine5: 257–260.
17.
GlasgowREWhitesidesHNelsonCC, et al. (2005) Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: Relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care28: 2655–2661.
18.
HaskettT (2006) Chronic illness management: Changing the system. Home Health Care Management & Practice18: 492–494.
İncirkuşKNahcivanN (2011) Validity and reliability study of Turkish version of the patient assessment of chronic illness care-patient. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylül University Nursing Faculty4: 102–109.
21.
JingXChenJDongY, et al. (2018) Related factors of quality of life of type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes16: 1–14.
22.
KaryaniAKRashidianASefiddashtiSE, et al. (2016) Self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and factors affecting HRQoL among individuals with health insurance in Iran. Epidemiology and Health38: e2016046.
23.
KayaÇAİçenFUğuzK, et al. (2013) Evaluation of chronic illness care from the patient’s perspective. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician4: 1–9.
24.
KongJXZhuLWangHM, et al (2019) Effectiveness of the chronic care model in type 2 diabetes management in a community health services center in China: A group randomized experimental study. Journal of Diabetes Research2019: 1–12.
25.
KristonPPikóBKovácsE (2012) Self perceived health, as an indicator of psychological well-being: Behavioural epidemiological analysis among the adolescent population. Orvosi Hetilap153:1875–1882.
26.
LiuLJLiYShaK, et al. (2013) Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, glycemic control and the utilization of community health care among the patients with type 2 diabetes in Shanghai, China. PLoS One8: e73010.
27.
LudtSVan LieshoutJCampbellSM, et al. (2012) Identifying factors associated with experiences of coronary heart disease patients receiving structured chronic care and counselling in European primary care. BMC Health Services Research12: 212–221.
28.
MegariK (2013) Quality of life in chronic disease patients. Health Psychology Research1: 141–148.
Ministry of Health (2014b) Multi-Sectoral Health Responsibility Development Program 2013–2023: Multi-Sectoral Approach to the Prevention and Promotion of Health, Development Management of Non-Communicable Disease. Ankara: Anıl Matbaacılık Ltd. Sti. Publication, pp. 19–25.
31.
MokhtariZGleshloghRGKurdiA (2019) Health related quality of life in Iranian patients patients with type 2 diabetes: An updated meta-analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews13: 402–407.
32.
MunshiMNSegalARSuhlE, et al (2013). Assessment of barriers to improve diabetes management in older adults. Diabetes Care36: 543–549.
33.
PouwerFHermannsN (2009) Insulin therapy and quality of life: A reviewDiabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews25: 4–10.
34.
Prasanna KumarHRMaheshMGMenonVB, et al. (2018) Patient self-reported quality of life assessment in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice21: 343–349.
35.
RashidMAMarkFHHosseinzadehH, et al. (2022) Implementation of chronic care model for diabetes self-management: A quantitative analysis. Diabetology3: 407–422.
36.
RobustoFBiscegliaLPetraroloV, et al (2018) The effects of the introduction of a chronic care model-based program on utilization of healthcare resources: the results of the Puglia care program. BMC Health Services Research18: 1–8.
37.
RwegereraGMMoshomoTGaenamongM, et al (2018) Health-related quality of life and associated factors among patients with diabetes mellitus in Botswana. Alexandria Journal of Medicine54: 111–118.
38.
SchmittdielJMosenDMGlasgowRE, et al (2008) Patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and improved patient centered outcomes for chronic conditions. Journal of General Internal Medicine23: 77–80.
39.
ShiroiwaTFukudaTIkedaS, et al. (2016) Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D. Quality Life Research25: 707–719.
40.
SkevingtonSMLotfyMO’ConnellKA (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial: A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research13: 299–310.
41.
SorensenMGrovenKGjelsvikB, et al. (2020) The roles of healthcare professionals in diabetes care: A qualitative study in Norwegian general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care38: 12–23.
42.
StellefsonMDipnarineKStopkaC (2013) Peer reviewed: The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: A systematic review. Preventing Chronic Disease10: e26.
43.
SuterPHennesseyBFlorezD, et al. (2011) Review series: Examples of chronic care model: The home-based chronic care model: Redesigning home health for high quality care delivery. Chronic Respiratory Disease8: 43–52.
44.
ThielDMSayahFAValianceJ, et al. (2017) Physical activity and health related quality of life in adults with type 2 Diabetes: Results from a prospective cohort study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health14: 368–374.
45.
Turkish Ministry of Health (2013) Turkey Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors Frequency Study. Ankara: Anil Publishing, pp. 253–260.
46.
Tütün YüminEBakarYTarsuslu ŞimşekT (2017) Effects of diabetes on quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences9: 77–86.
47.
WagnerEHAustinBTDavisC, et al. (2001) Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Affairs20: 64–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
