There is significant need and enormous potential for innovation in clinical settings. However, for various reasons, this potential is rarely realised.
Aims
This paper aims to present a collaborative approach to innovation between clinicians and engineers, using two nursing case studies as examples. Suggestions are offered to improve facilitation of innovation in healthcare settings.
Methods
An engineering design process was applied to develop novel medical devices in response to unmet clinical needs identified by nurses. This process includes problem exploration, definition of project scope, concept generation, detailed design, manufacture, prototype evaluation and iterative design improvements.
Results
Two case studies are presented to showcase the results of this multidisciplinary approach to innovation. Both projects resulted in novel medical devices being put into clinical use safely and effectively.
Conclusions
Collaboration between nurses and engineers facilitates rapid iteration of novel solutions to unmet clinical needs. Both professions have similar approaches to problem-solving, complemented by specialist knowledge in their contrasting areas of expertise, making for a highly capable multidisciplinary team.
Clarkson PJ, Bogle D, Dean J, Tooley M, Trewby J, Vaughan L, Adams E, Dudgeton P, Platt N, Shelton P (2017) Engineering better care: a systems approach to health and care design and continuous improvement. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
7.
Council of the European Union (1993) Medical Devices Directive (Council Directive 93/42/EEC). Official Journal of the European Union(L 169/10001–0043.
8.
Council of the European Union (2017) Medical Device Regulations (Regulation (EU) 2017/745). Official Journal of the European Union(L 117/1117–175.
9.
CraftJ (2010) Patient-controlled analgesia: Is it worth the painful prescribing process?Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings23(4): 434–438.
JenetzkyE (2007) Prevalence estimation of anorectal malformations using German diagnosis related groups system. Pediatric Surgery International23(12): 1161–1165.
18.
LehmannKA (2005) Recent developments in Pptient-controlled analgesia. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management29(5): 72–89.
19.
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (2017) Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation. Available at: http://centerforinnovation.mayo.edu/ (accessed 20 February 2020).
20.
McNicolEDFergusonMCHudcovaJ (2015) Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non-patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews6: CD003348.
21.
National Health Service, NHS (2019) The NHS Long Term Plan. London: NHS. Available at: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ (accessed 20 February 2020).
National Institute for Health Research (2019) Devices for Dignity MedTech Co-operative. Available at: https://devicesfordignity.org.uk/ (accesed 20 February 2020)..
24.
NematiMH (2015) The evaluation of the benefits of pain control by patients using PCA pump compared to medicine injection to ease the pain by nurses. Journal of Medicine and Life8(4): 144–149.
