The aim of this study was to examine nurses’ views on the impact that mass media has on service users and how this affects nurse/service user interactions. Internationally, the mass media is an important source of health information for the public. Media framing therefore exerts considerable influence on the public’s perceptions of healthcare professionals and services. However, it is not known how the reporting of health stories by the media impacts the work of front-line nursing staff. This is a qualitative interpretivist study using a single case study design, and includes semi-structured interviews with qualified nursing staff (n = 31) within a large hospital in the United Kingdom. There are three key themes: ‘scaremongering health stories’, ‘negative portrayal of the nursing profession’ and ‘informed service users’. Nurses perceived media framing of health and healthcare services as predominantly negative. Nurses need greater awareness of how service users receive and respond to health information and how health stories are reported. Closer engagement between health journalists and nurses through ‘journalist-in-residence’ programmes could enable nurses and journalists to gain greater appreciation of their respective sets of knowledge to support shared and informed decision-making between service users and professionals.
AhmadFHudakPLBercovitzKet al.(2006) Are physicians ready for patients with internet-based health information?Journal of Medical Internet Research8(3): e22.
2.
AtkinCKWallackL (1990) Mass Communication and Public Health, Newbury Park: SAGE.
BernabeoEHolmboeES (2013) Patients, providers, and systems need to acquire a specific set of competencies to achieve truly patient-centred care. Health Affairs32(2): 250–280.
5.
BoltonSC (2004) A simple matter of control? NHS hospital nurses and new management. Journal of Management Studies41(2): 317–333.
6.
BorglinGFagerströmC (2012) Nursing students’ understanding of critical thinking and appraisal and academic writing: A descriptive, qualitative study. Nurse Education Practice12(6): 356–360.
7.
BrashersDEHaasSMKlingleRSet al.(2000) Collective AIDS activism and individuals’ perceived self-advocacy in physician–patient communication. Human Communication Research26: 372–402.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
9.
BylundCLSabeeCMImesRSet al.(2007) Exploration of the construct of reliance among patients who talk with their providers about internet information. Journal of Health Communication12(1): 17–28.
10.
CarducciAAlfaniSSassiMet al.(2011) Mass media health information: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of daily press coverage and its relation with public perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling82(3): 475–478. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21288683 (accessed 29 March 2016).
11.
ConradPStultsC (2010) The internet and the experience of illness. In: BirdCEConradPFremontAMet al.(eds) The Handbook of Medical Sociology, 6th edn. Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 179–191.
12.
Denzin NK and Lincoln YS (eds) (2000) The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
13.
FeldmanMSBellJBergerMT (2003) Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers, Oxford: Altamira Press.
14.
FergusonLAPawlakR (2011) Health literacy: The road to improved health outcomes. Journal of Nurse Practice7(2): 123–129.
15.
GrantA (2013) The effect of the use of discretion on occupational therapists’ professional identity. British Journal of Occupational Therapy76(9): 409–417.
16.
GrilliRRamsayCMinozziS (2002) Mass media interventions: Effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1. CD000389. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869574 (accessed 29 March 2016).
17.
HiltonSBedfordHCalnanMet al.(2009) Competency, confidence and conflicting evidence: Key issues affecting health visitors’ use of research evidence in practice. BMC Nursing8(1): 4.
18.
HiltonSHuntKBedfordHet al.(2011) School nurses’ experiences of delivering the UK HPV vaccination programme in its first year. BMC Infectious Diseases11(1): 226. Available at: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/226 (accessed 29 March 2016).
19.
HiltonSPetticrewMHuntK (2007) Parents’ champions vs. vested interests: Who do parents believe about MMR? A qualitative study. BMC Public Health7(1): 42. Available at: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/42 (accessed 29 March 2016).
20.
Hoyle LP (2011) New public management and nursing relationships in the NHS. PhD thesis, University of Stirling, UK.
21.
HoyleLP (2014a) Nurses’ perception of senior managers at the front line: People working with clipboards. Journal of Advanced Nursing70(11): 2528–2538.
22.
HoyleLP (2014b) “I mean obviously you’re using your discretion”: Nurses' use of discretion in policy implementation. Social Policy and Society13: 2.
23.
HoyleLPGrantA (2015) Treatment targets in emergency departments: Nurses’ views of how they affect clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing15–16: 2211–2218.
24.
KitzingerJ (2009) The Media and Public Risk, London: The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council.
25.
LayderD (2006) Understanding Social Theory, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
26.
LeeCJ (2008) Does the internet displace health professionals?Journal of Health Communication13(5): 450–464.
27.
LiuHPriestS (2009) Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science18(6): 704–718. Available at: http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0963662508097625 (accessed 29 March 2016).
28.
LowreyWAndersonWB (2006) The impact of internet use on the public perception of physicians: A perspective from the sociology of professions literature. Health Communication19(2): 125–131.
29.
McMullanM (2006) Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling63(1–2): 24–28. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16406474 (accessed 29 March 2016).
30.
MayerGVillaireM (2011) Health literacy: An opportunity for nurses to lead by example. Nursing Outlook59(2): 59–60.
31.
MurrayELoBPollackLet al.(2003) The impact of health information on the internet on health care and the physician–patient relationship: National US survey among 1,050 US physicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research5(3): e17.
32.
Nilsson KajermoKAilnaghizadehHFalkUet al.(2014) Psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire and primary healthcare nurses’ attitudes towards research and use of research findings. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences28(1): 173–185.
33.
PrueCELackeyCSwenarskiLet al.(2003) Communication monitoring: Shaping CDC’s emergency risk communication efforts. Journal of Health Communication8(Suppl 1): 35–49. discussion 148–151. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14692571 (accessed 29 March 2016).
34.
RitchieJSpencerLO'ConnerW (2008) Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: RitchieJLewisJ (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, Sage: London, pp. 219–262.
35.
RoweGFrewerLSjobergL (2000) Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden. Public Understanding of Science. 9(1)59–78. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11624282 (accessed 29 March 2016).
36.
RuttenLJFAroraNKBakosADet al.(2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: A systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Education and Counseling57(3): 250–261. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15893206 (accessed 29 March 2016).
Van BekkumJEHiltonS (2013) Primary care nurses’ experiences of how the mass media influence frontline healthcare in the UK. BMC Family Practice14(1): 178. Available at: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/14/178 (accessed 29 March 2016).
