Use of home enteral tube feeding (HETF) has increased in Western countries but research is scarce, especially about patients’ experiences of daily life when being treated with HETF. This study aimed to explore what it means to live with HETF and how the situation can be managed. A qualitative method was carried out according to Grounded Theory. In total, 22 interviews were performed with 11 patients treated with HETF for between 8 weeks and 2 years, using open-ended questions. Sampling, data collection and data analysis were carried out simultaneously. To be treated with HETF was experienced as positive as it meant survival, but the most prominent finding told about experiences of restrictions, practical problems and distress in the patients’ daily lives. How daily life turned out seemed to depend on the patient’s ability to manage problems, but was also strongly related to the amount and quality of information and support they received from health professionals. Lacking preparation before discharge as well as lacking support at home meant insecurity and uncertainty. The findings stress the need for comprehensive preparation and support from health professionals, and improvements are needed to facilitate HETF patients’ daily life.
AlgeraMFranckeAKerkstraA (2004) Home care needs of patients with long-term conditions: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing46: 417–429.
2.
BjuresäterKLarssonMNordströmG (2008) Cooperation in the care for patients with home enteral tube feeding throughout the care trajectory: Nurses' perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing17: 3021–3029.
3.
BowlesKHNaylorMDFoustJB (2002) Patient characteristics at hospital discharge and a comparison of home care referral decisions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society50: 336–342.
4.
BrothertonAAbbottJAggettP (2006) The impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding upon daily life in adults. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics19: 355–367.
5.
BrothertonAMAbbottJHurleyMA (2007) Home percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: Perceptions of patients, carers, nurses and dietitians. Journal of Advanced Nursing59: 388–397.
6.
Corbin J (1986) Coding, writing memos, and diagramming. In: Chenitz CW and Swanson JM (eds) From practise to grounded theory - qualitative research in nursing. Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 102--120.
7.
CostelloMTodd-MagelC (1997) Bridging the gap: Hospital to home nutrition support. Medsurg Nursing6: 328–338.
8.
CrawfordGBBrooksbankMABrownM (2013) Unmet needs of people with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Recommendations for change in Australia. Internal Medicine Journal43: 183–190.
9.
CrosbyJDuerksenDR (2005) A retrospective survey of tube-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Digestive Diseases and Sciences50: 1712–1717.
10.
CrosbyJDuerksenDR (2007) A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition31: 274–277.
11.
DarkinsARyanPKobbR (2008) Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemedicine and e-Health14: 1118–1126.
12.
EmdenCHancockHSchubertS (2001) A web of intrigue: The search for quality in qualitative research. Nurse Education in Practice1: 201–211.
13.
FexAEkASöderhamnO (2009) Self-care among persons using advanced medical technology at home. Journal of Clinical Nursing18: 2809–2817.
14.
GuerriereDNZagorskiBCoytePC (2013) Family caregiver satisfaction with home-based nursing and physician care over the palliative care trajectory: Results from a longitudinal survey questionnaire. Palliative Medicine27: 632–638.
15.
HitchingsHBestCSteedI (2010) Home enteral tube feeding in older people: Considerations of the issues. British Journal of Nursing19: 1150–1154.
16.
Howard J and van Bokhorst-de van der Schueeren M (2011) Techniques of nutritional support. In: Sobotka L (ed) Basics in clinical nutrition. 4th edn. Galén, 309--330.
17.
HowardPBowenN (2001) The challenges of innovation in the organization of home enteral tube feeding. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics14: 3–11.
18.
JordanSPhilpinS (2006) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: The burden of treatment from a patient perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing56: 270–281.
L'EstrangeF (1997) An audit of adult patients on home enteral tube feeding in a region of Northern Ireland. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics10: 277–287.
21.
LarssonMHedelinBAthlinE (2007) A supportive nursing care clinic: Conceptions of patients with head and neck cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing11: 45–59.
22.
LileyAManthorpeJ (2003) The impact of home enteral tube feeding in everyday life: A qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community11: 415–422.
23.
LochsHAllisonSMeierR (2006) Introductory to the ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Terminology, definitions and general topics. Clinical Nutrition25: 180–186.
24.
LoeserCvon HerzUKuchlerT (2003) Quality of life and nutritional state in patients on home enteral tube feeding. Nutrition19: 605–611.
25.
McNamaraEFloodPKennedyN (2000) Enteral tube feeding in the community: Survey of adult patients discharged from a Dublin hospital. Clinical Nutrition19: 15–22.
26.
MorseJMNoerager SternPCorbinJ (2009) Developing grounded theory. The second generation, Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
27.
NeillS (2006) Grounded theory sampling: The contribution of reflexivity. Journal of Research in Nursing11: 253–260.
28.
Northern Nurses' Federation (2003) Ethical guidelines for nursing research in the Nordic Countries. Vård i Norden23: 1–5 (Supplement).
29.
ReddyPMaloneM (1998) Cost and outcome analysis of home parenteral and enteral nutrition. Journal of Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition22: 302–310.
30.
RobergeCTranMMassoudC (2000) Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: A French prospective study with head and neck or oesophagal cancer. British Journal of Cancer82: 263–269.
31.
ScottFBeechRSmedleyF (2005) Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of the costs and consequences of systematic nutrition team follow-up over 12 mo after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Nutrition21: 1071–1077.
32.
StaunMPironiLBozzettiF (2009) ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in adult patients. Clinical Nutrition28: 467–479.
33.
SternJ (2006) Home parenteral nutrition and the psyche: Psychological challenges for patient and family. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society65: 222–226.
34.
StrattonR (2002) A guide to use enteral nutrition in the community. Journal of Community Nursing16: 44–49.
35.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, California: Sage Publications.
36.
Van GossumA (2005) Home enteral nutrition. Epidemiology and legislation in Europe. In: LochsHThomasD (eds) Home Care Enteral Feeding, Basel: S. Karger AG, pp. 59–71.
37.
VenturaADBurneySBrookerJ (2014) Home-based palliative care: A systematic literature review of the self-reported unmet needs of patients and carers. Palliative Medicine28: 391–402.
38.
WellsMDonnanPSharpL (2008) A study to evaluate nurse-led on-treatment review for patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing17: 1428–1439.
39.
WilliamsonTTalbertJ (2008) Professional issues. The shift of oncology inpatient care to outpatient care: The challenge of retaining expert oncology nurses. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing12: 186–189.
40.
WinklerMRossVPiamjariyakulU (2006) Technology dependence in home care: Impact on patients and their family caregivers. Nutrition in Clinical Practice21: 544–556.
41.
WMA (2013) Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
