This paper seeks to highlight the challenges facing researchers when recruiting vulnerable patients to a research study. We explore the difficulties experienced in gatekeeping for a project involving people with dementia, intellectual disabilities and mental health problems who are also having treatment for cancer. It is argued that the challenges in identifying and recruiting vulnerable participants extend beyond ethics committees and governance to the perceptions and judgements of health care professionals in ‘allowing’ access to particular patient groups. These positions and judgements appear to be embedded in certain construction(s) of cancer and discourses surrounding dementia, intellectual disabilities and mental health.
AlbertiniMKohliMVogelC (2007) Transfers of time and money in European families: Common patterns, different regimes?Journal of European Social policy17: 319–444.
2.
BackerCChapmanMMitchellD (2009) Access to secondary healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities22: 514–525.
3.
BarnettE (2000) Involving people with dementia in redesigning and delivery care: ‘I need to be Me!’, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
4.
BeauchampTLChildressJF (2009) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. Oxford: University Press, Oxford.
5.
BoustaniMCallahanCMUnverzagtFW (2005) Implementing a screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine20: 572–577.
6.
CarelH (2009) A reply to ‘Towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability’ by Derek Sellman: Vulnerability and illness. Nursing Philosophy10: 214–219.
7.
ClarkeHFDrieverM.J (1983) Vulnerability: The development of a construct for nursing. In: ed ChinnPL (ed.) Advances in Nursing Theory Development, Maryland: Aspen, pp. 207–220.
8.
ClarkeCKeadyJ (2002) Getting down to brass tacks: A discussion of data. In: WilkinsonH (ed.) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research Methods & Motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 25–46.
9.
ConnollyAGaehlEMartinH (2011) Under-diagnosis of dementia in primary care: Variations in the observed prevalence and comparisons to the expected prevalence. Aging & Mental Health15(8): 978–984.
10.
CumellaSMartinD (2004) Secondary healthcare and learning disability: Results of consensus development conferences. Journal of Learning Disabilities8: 30–40.
11.
DamjanovicAIvkovicMJasovic-GasicM (2006) Comorbidity of Schizophrenia and cancer: Clinical recommendations for treatment. Psychiatric Danub18: 55–60.
12.
DupuisSLWiersmaELoiselleL (2012) Pathologizing behavoir: Meanings of behavoirs in dementia Care. Journal of Ageing Studies26(2): 162–173.
13.
ForbatLMcCannL (2010) Adults with Intellectual disabilities affected by cancer: Critical challenges for the involvement agenda. European Journal of Cancer Care19: 91–97.
14.
GorpBVVercruysseT (2012) Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: A framing analysis of media content. Social Science & Medicine74: 1274–1281.
15.
GrantJAHundleyH (2008) Fighting the battle or running the race? Metaphor analysis of cancer photos in the associated press. Visual Communication Quarterly15(3): 180–195.
16.
GrimenH (2009) Power, trust & risk: Some reflections on an absent issue. Medical Anthropology Quarterly23(1): 16–33.
17.
HartSL (1998) Learning-disabled people’s experience of general hospitals. British Journal of Nursing7: 470–477.
18.
HansenECHughesCRoutleyG (2008) General practitioners’ experiences and understandings of diagnosing dementia: Factors impacting on early diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine67: 1776–1783.
19.
HarreRvan LangenhoveL (1999) Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Actions, Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
HellstromINolanMNordenfeltL (2007) Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Nursing Ethics14: 608–619.
21.
HugmanRPittawayEBartolomeiL (2011) When ‘do no harm’ is not enough: The ethics of research with refugees and other vulnerable groups. British Journal of Social Work. 1–17. DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcr013.
22.
HowardLMBarleyEADaviesE (2010) Cancer diagnosis in people with severe mental illness: Practical and ethical issues. The Lancet11: 797–804.
23.
JuritzenTIGrimenHHeggenK (2011) Protecting vulnerable research participants: A foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees. Nursing Ethics18(5): 640–650.
24.
KaiserK (2008) The meaning of the survivor identity for women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine67: 79–83.
25.
KendallS (2006) Admiring courage: Nurses’ perceptions of caring for patients with cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing10(5): 324–334.
26.
KiselySSadekJMacKenzieA (2008) Excess cancer mortality in psychiatric patients. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry53: 753–762.
27.
KitwoodT (1990) The dialectics of dementia: With particular reference to Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing and Society10: 177–196.
28.
KitwoodT (1997) Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first, Buckingham: Open University.
29.
LawJ (2004) After method: Mess in social science research, London: Routledge.
30.
LiamputtongP (2007) Researching the Vulnerable, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
31.
MacDougallCFudgeE (2001) Planning and recruiting the sample for focus groups and in-depth interviews. Qualitative Health Research11(1): 117–126.
32.
MartenssonGCarlssonCLampicC (2008) Do nurse and cancer patients agree on cancer patients’ coping resources, emotional distress & quality of life. European Journal of Cancer Care17(4): 350–360.
33.
Mental Capacity Act (2005) (c.9), London: The Stationary Office.
34.
McCannLForbatL (2007) Older people with learning disabilities affected by cancer: Involvement and engagement work to inform a research agenda, Stirling: Cancer Care Research Centre, University of Stirling.
35.
McConkeyRTruesdaleM (2000) Reactions of nurses and therapists in mainstream health services to contact with people who have learning disabilities. Journal of Advanced Nursing32: 158–163.
36.
McKeownJClarkeAIngletonC (2010) Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing19(13–14): 1935–1943.
37.
MiovicMBlockS (2007) Psychiatric disorders in advanced cancer. Cancer110: 1665–1676.
38.
MuldersMVingerhoetsABreedW (2008) The impact of cancer and chemotherapy: Perceptual similarities and differences between cancer patients, nurses and physicians. European Journal of Oncology Nursing12: 97–102.
39.
OrrDMR (2010) The pursuit of certainty in diagnosing dementia: Cognitive testing, childishness and stress in two British memory clinics. Anthropology & Medicine17(3): 327–338.
40.
RogersAPilgrimD (2007) A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness, 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
41.
SellmanD (2005) Towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability. Nursing Philosophy6: 2–10.
42.
ShipmanCGyselsMWhiteP (2008) Improving generalist end of life care: National consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics and service user groups. British Medical Journal337: 720–720.
43.
SlevinESinesD (1996) Attitudes of nurses in a general hospital towards people with learning difficulties: Influences of contact and graduate-non-graduate status, a comparative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing24: 1116–1126.
44.
SontagS (1991) Illness as Metaphor. AIDS and its metaphors, London: Penguin Books.
45.
Tew (2011) Social Approaches to Mental Distress, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
Thornicroft G (2006) Shunned: Discrimination against People with Mental Illness. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47.
Tuffrey-WijneIBernalJJonesA (2006) People with intellectual disabilities and their need for cancer information. European Journal of Oncology Nursing10: 106–116.
48.
TranERouillonFLozeJY (2009) Cancer mortality in patients with schizophrenia: An 11 year prospective cohort study. Cancer115: 3555–3562.
49.
WilesJ (2011) Reflections on being a recipient of care: Vexing the concept of vulnerability. Social & Cultural Geography12(6): 573–588.
50.
WilligC (2009) ‘Unlike a rock, a tree, a horse or an angel.’ reflections on the struggle for meaning through writing during the process of cancer diagnosis. Journal of Health Psychology14(2): 181–189.
51.
Willig C (2011) Cancer diagnosis as discursive capture: Phenomenological repercussions of being positioned within dominant constructions of cancer. Social Science & Medicine 73(6): 897–903.
52.
WilkinsonDStaveCKeohaneD (2004) The role of general practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A multinational survey. Journal of International Medical Research32(2): 149–159.
53.
Williams CamusJT (2009) Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press. Discourse Studies11(4): 465–495.
54.
Vernooij-DassenMMoniz-CookEwoodsRT (2005) Factors affecting timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia across Europe: From awareness to stigma. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry20(4): 377–386.
55.
ZomorodiMFoleyBJ (2009) The nature of advocacy vs. paternalism in nursing: Clarifying the ‘thin line’. Journal of Advanced Nursing65(8): 1746–1752.
