You are on the new improved site. You can view the old site in view-only mode here until June 27, 2026

Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

Browse

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Sage Publications. All rights reserved. This website is technically supported and operated by China National Publications Import and Export (Group) Co., Ltd. 京ICP备09090397号-11

Review: Using an emic and etic ethnographic technique in a grounded theory study of information use by practice nurses in New Zealand

Journal of Research in Nursing

Impact Factor: 2.0 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 5.6

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

Research article

First published online December, 2013

Review: Using an emic and etic ethnographic technique in a grounded theory study of information use by practice nurses in New Zealand

Volume 18, Issue 8

https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987112446258

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Garfinkel H and Wieder L (1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In: Watson G and Seiler RM (Eds) Text in context: Studies in ethnomethodology. London: Sage.

Orlan-Barak

(2002) The theoretical sensitivity of the researcher: Reflections on a complex construct. Reflective Pract 3(3): 263–278.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues