Nursing research activity by clinicians has increased in volume in the last few years, due to an increased awareness of the importance of evidence-based practice, the shift of nurse education into higher education establishments and the emergence of new nursing roles which demand research activity as a central domain of the role. This paper will report on the results of a study examining nursing research activity in the UK National Health Service and will present data examining the perceptions and experiences of nurses undertaking research. Forty-eight research-active nurses in five NHS organisations were interviewed. Data were analysed using the Framework approach. Four main themes emerged: perceptions of nursing research, NHS influences, support systems and individual influences. Many factors were identified by nurses that influenced their experiences and perceptions, and nurses frequently reported difficulties in being able to conduct research in the clinical area. Dissemination via publication was rare. Personal sacrifices were common and nurses felt that these were not recognised by managers. Nurses undertaking research need more structured support systems and recognition of the value of nursing research. Individualised help from more experienced researchers for support and to disseminate findings is recommended.
Bellman, L. (2005) The invisibility of nursing research: myth or reality? Journalof Research inNursing10: 243—246.
2.
Bishop, V. (2004) Knocking down ivory towers: publish and be damned. In: Freshwater, D. and Bishop, V. (eds) Nursing Research in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 168—185.
3.
Blacktop. J. (1996) A discussion of different types of sampling techniques . Nurse Researcher3: 5—15.
4.
Bowling, A. (1997) Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5.
Bradshaw, P.L. (2001) Developing scholarship in nursing in Britain — towards a strategy. Journal of Nursing Management9: 125—128.
6.
Burnard, P. (1995) Nurse educators' perceptions of reflection and reflective practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing21: 1167—1174.
7.
Butterworth, A., Jackson, C., Brown, E., Hessey, E., Fergusson, J., Orme, M. (2005) Clinical academic careers for educators and researchers in nursing. Journalof Research inNursing10: 85—97.
8.
Campbell, J., Cooke, M., Evans, J., Streeton, R. [on-line] (2002) The Mapping Project: Health and Social Care Research in Northamptonshire. Results of the Survey. University CollegeNorthamptonhttp://www.northampton.ac.uk/aps/nche/mappigngprojectreport.pdf (8 June 2005).
9.
Clarke, C., Proctor, S. (1999) Practice development: ambiguity in research and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing30: 975—982.
10.
Clifford, C., Murray, S. (2001) Pre- and post-test evaluation of a project to facilitate research development in practice in a hospital setting. JournalofAdvanced Nursing36: 6.
11.
Clifford, C. (2004) Introduction In: Clifford, C. and Clark, J. (eds). Getting Research into Practice. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 3—17.
12.
Clifford, C., Clark, J. (eds)(2004) Getting Research into Practice. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone.
13.
Coghlan, D., Casey, M. (2001) Action Research from the inside: issues and challenges in doing action research in your own hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing35: 674—682.
14.
Department of Health (1991) Research for Health: A Research and Development Strategy for the NHS. London: HMSO.
15.
Department of Health (1996) Research and Development:Towards an Evidence-based Health Service. London: Department of Health.
16.
Department of Health (1997) The New NHS: Modern. Dependable. London: The Stationery Office.
17.
Department of Health (1999) Making a Difference: Strengthening the Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Contribution to Health and Healthcare. London: The Stationery Office.
18.
Department of Health (2000) Towards a Nursing and Midwifery Research and Development Strategy. London: Department of Health.
19.
Department of Health (2001) A New Research Governance Framework. London: The Stationery Office.
20.
Department of Health [on-line] (2005) Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees. Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics (8 June 2005).
21.
Griffiths, M. and Clark, J. (2004) Managing the local agenda: planning to get research/evidence-based care into practice. In: Clifford, C. and Clark, J. (eds). Getting Research into Practice. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone , pp. 61—82.
22.
Hicks, C. (1995a) A study of nurse managers' constructs of nurse researchers. Journal of Nursing Management3: 237—245.
23.
Hicks, C. (1995b) The shortfall in nursing research: a study of nurses' research and publication activities. Journal of Advanced Nursing21: 594—604.
24.
Hicks, C. (1996) Nurse researcher: a study of contradiction in terms ? Journal of Advanced Nursing24: 357—363.
25.
Higher Education Funding Council for England [on-line] (2002) Research Capacity in Nursing and Allied Health Professions: Joint Response by the Department of Health and the HEFCE to the Recommendations of the Task Group 3 Report. Circular Letter 10/02. HEFCEhttp://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/circlets/2002/cl10_02.htm (7 June 2002).
26.
HM Treasury [on-line] (2006) Chancellor appoints Sir David Cooksey to lead health research review. HM Treasury.
27.
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/newsroom_and_speeches/press/2006/press_24_06.cfm (6 June 2006).
28.
Holloway, I., Wheeler S. (1996) Qualitative Research for Nurses. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
29.
Howarth, M.L., Kneafsey, R. (2005) The impact of research governance in healthcare and higher education organizations. Journal of Advanced Nursing49: 675—683.
30.
Jinks, A.M., Green, H.E. (2004) Clinical and academic perspectives on how to develop and enhance nursing research activities. NT Research9: 401—410.
31.
Kuuppelomaki, M., Tuomi, J. (2003) Finnish nurses' views on their research activities . Journal of Clinical Nursing12: 589—600.
32.
Le May, A., Mulhall, A., Alexander, C. (1998) Bridging the research-practice gap: exploring the research cultures of practitioners and managers. Journal of Advanced Nursing28: 428—437.
33.
Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Enquiry. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
34.
Lingard, L., Reznick, R., Espin, S., Regehr, G., DeVito, I. (2002) Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine77: 232—237.
35.
Maggs, C. (1997) Research and the nursing agenda: confronting what we believe nursing to be. NT Research2: 321—322.
36.
Malby, R. (1996) Research and development in nursing and the professions allied to medicine. In: Baker, M. and Kirk, S. (eds). Research and Development for the NHS: Evidence, Evaluation and Effectiveness. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, pp. 65—73.
37.
McClarey, M., Smith, S. (2005) Letters to the editor. Journal of Research in Nursing10: 121—122.
38.
McCormack, B.M. (2003) Knowing and acting —a strategic practitioner-focused approach to nursing research and practice development. NT Research8: 86—100.
39.
McCormack, B.M. (2004) RCN debate: this house believes that the only way forward for nursing research is through the development of centers of excellence . NT Research9: 306—312 .
40.
Meyer, J., Johnson, B., Proctor, S., Bryar, R., Rozmovits, L. (2003) Practitioner research: exploring issues in relation to research capacity building. NT Research8: 407—417.
41.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
42.
Mulhall, A. (1995) Nursing research: what difference does it make ? Journal of Advanced Nursing21: 576—583.
43.
Mulhall, A. (1999) Creating change in practice. In: Mulhall, A. and Le May, A. (eds.) Nursing Research: Dissemination and Implementation . Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone , pp. 151—175.
44.
NationalCo-ordinating Centre for Service Delivery and Organisation research and development (NCCSDO) (2003) Identifying Research Priorities for Nursing and Midwifery Service Delivery and Organisation. London: NCCSDO.
45.
Rafferty, A.-M., Bond, S., Traynor, M. (2000) Does nursing, midwifery and health visiting need a research council? NT Research5: 325—335.
46.
Rafferty, A.-M., Newell, R., Traynor, M. (2004) Research and development: policy and capacity building. In: Freshwater, D. and Bishop, V. (eds.) Nursing Research in Context: Appreciation, Application and ProfessionalDevelopment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 22—44.
47.
Redwood, S. (2005) Colliding discourses: deconstructing the process of seeking ethical approval for a participatory evaluation project. Journalof Research inNursing10: 217—230.
48.
Reed, J., Proctor, S., Murray, S. (1996) A sampling strategy for qualitative research. Nurse Researcher3: 52—68.
49.
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research . In: Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge, pp. 173—194.
50.
Robinson, J. (1999) Taking the initiative: supporting nursing research in an acute trust. Nurse Researcher6: 41—50.
51.
Roxburgh, M. (2006) An exploration of the factors which constrain nurses from research participation. Journal of Clinical Nursing15: 535—545.
52.
Royal College of Nursing (2006) 21. Nursing Research Council: Report of the debate on this item. http://www.rcn.org/news/congress/2006/21.php.
53.
Sarre, G. [on-line] (2003) Trent Focus: Supporting Research and Development in Primary Care Organisations: Report of the Capacity and Activity in Research Project. http://www.trentfocus.org/-Resources/CARPFinalReport.pdf (10 June 2005).
54.
Shaw, H., Clifford, C. (2004) Research in healthcare: establishing a national research and development programme. In: Clifford, C. and Clark, J. (eds.) Getting Research into Practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, pp. 19—40.
55.
Slevin, E., Sines, D. (1999/2000) Enhancing the truthfulness, consistency and transferability of a qualitative study: utilising a manifold of approaches . Nurse Researcher7: 79—97.
56.
Smith, R. (2000) Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandal. British Medical Journal320: 1285—1286.
57.
Streeton, R., Cooke, M., Campbell, J. (2004) Researching the researchers: using a snowballing technique. Nurse Researcher12: 35—46.
58.
Tanner, J., Hale, C. (2002a) Research-active nurses' perceptions of the barriers to undertaking research in practice. NT Research7: 363—375.
59.
Tanner, J., Hale, C. (2002b) Developing research capacity: identifying and quantifying nursing research activity in the NHS. NT Research7: 212—222.
60.
Thompson, D.R. (2000) An exploration of knowledge development in nursing — a personal perspective. NT Research5: 391—394.
61.
Thompson, C., McCaughan, D., Cullum, N., Sheldon, T.A., Mulhall, A., Thompson, D.R. (2001) The accessibility of research-based knowledge for nurses in United Kingdom acute care settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing36: 11—22.
62.
Tierney, A.J. (1998) The leading edge in nursing research. NT Research3: 303—312.
63.
Titchen. A., McGinley, M. (2003) Facilitating practitioner research through critical companionship. NT Research8: 115—131.
64.
Walker, K. (1994) Research with/ in nursing: `troubling' the field . Contemporary Nurse3: 162—168.
65.
Watson, R., Manthorpe, J. (2002) Research governance: best for whom. Journal of Advanced Nursing39: 515—516.
66.
Winslow, E.H. (1996) Failure to publish research: A form of scientific misconduct?Heart and Lung25: 169—171.
67.
Yin, R. ( 2003) Case Study Research: Designs and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series.Volume 5, 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications.
