Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure primary health care professionals' (PHCP) views and perceptions of type 2 diabetes care. Management of type 2 diabetes within the UK is moving from secondary to primary led care. A need was identified to develop a tool to measure PHCP' views and perceptions of diabetes as studies have shown that these can have an impact on patient outcomes. There were four main stages in the development of the questionnaire that has used rare methodology. The first was an in-depth literature review of research databases, nationally recognized standards and professional literature. From this, criteria for the questionnaire were developed.The second stage involved a consultation with a national panel of diabetes experts. This utilized the nominal group technique consensus approach to determine ranked criteria. A sample of PHCP was interviewed on a one-to-one basis using the `talk through' technique for the third stage and was invited to make in-depth comments on each of the questions. The questionnaire was finally piloted with different professional groups working in community care. The developed questionnaire was used in a study evaluating the impact of the Glasgow Diabetes Project.

Keywords

questionnaire PODQ type 2 diabetes professionals' attitudes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson R.M. , Fitzgerald J.T. , Funnell M.M. , Gruppen L.D. (1998). The third version of the diabetes attitude scale . Diabetes Care 21: 1403—1407.

Campbell S.M. , Roland M.O. , Shekelle P.G. , Cantrill J.A. , Buetow S.A. , Cragg D.K. (1998). Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice. Quality in Health Care 8: 6—15.

Clark, M. , Hampson, S.E. (2003). Comparison of patients' and healthcare professionals' beliefs about and attitudes towards Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 20: 152—154.

Clinical Standards Board for Scotland. (2001 ). Clinical Standards: Diabetes. Edinburgh , CSBS.

Cooper M.A. , Kinn S. , Ibbotson T. , Lindsay G. , Swann I. (2000). Emergency nurse practitioner's documentation: development of an audit tool. Emergency Nurse 8(5): 22—27.

Dunning, T. , Martin, M. (1999). Health professionals' perceptions of the seriousness of diabetes. Practical Diabetes International 16(3): 73—77.

Evans, C. , Drennan, V. (1999). The nominal group technique: a research tool for primary care. RCN Annual Research Conference, Keele University, April.

Gordon, D. , McDowell, J. (1996). The organisation of diabetic care. In: McDowell, J.R.S. , Gordon, D. (eds.) Diabetes: caring for patients in the community Edinburgh. Churchill Livingstone , 249—261.

Goyder E.C. , McNally P.G. , Drucquer M. , Spiers N. , Botha J.L. (1998). Shifting of care for diabetes from secondary to primary care 1990—95: a review of general practices. British Medical Journal 1998; 316: 1505—1506.

10.

Griffen, S. , Kinmonth, A.L. (2000). Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes. The Cochrane Collaboration.

11.

Jones, J. , Hunter, D. (1995). Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 311: 376—380.

12.

Krans H.M.J. , Porta M. , Keen H. , Staehr Johansen K. (1995). Diabetes care and research in Europe: the St Vincent Declaration action programme. Implementation document. World Health Organization, Rome.

13.

Larme, A.C. , Pugh, J.A. (1998). Attitudes of primary care providers towards diabetes barriers to guideline implementation. Diabetes Care 21(9): 1391—1396.

14.

McColl E. , Jacoby A. , Thomas L. , Soutter J. , Bamford C. , Steen N. , Thomas R. , Harvey E. , Garratt A. , Bond J. ( 2001). Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of healthstaff and patients. Health Technology Assessment 5(31): 1—266.

15.

Oppenheim, A.N. (2001). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London, Continuum 147.

16.

Parahoo, K. (1997). Nursing Research: Principles, process and issues . Houndsmill: Macmillan, 246—276.

17.

Polit, D.F. , Hungler, B.P. (1999). Nursing Research Principles and Methods, (6th edn): Lippincott, 331—362.

18.

Renders C.M. , Valk G.D. , Griffin S. , Wagner E.H. , van Eijk T.Th.M. , Assendelft W.J.J. (2005). Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews Issue 3.

19.

Scottish Executive. (2002). Scottish Diabetes Framework. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

20.

Sign 55. (2001). Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network: Management of Diabetes. Edinburgh: SIGN Executive.

21.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. (1998 ). Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 38) British Medical Journal 317: 703—713.

22.

Woodcock A.J. , Kinmonth A.L. , Campbell M.J. , Griffen S.J. , Spiegal N.M. (1999). Diabetes care from diagnosis: effects of training in patient-centred care on beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of primary care professionals. Patient Education and Counseling, 37: 65—79.

Development of a questionnaire to determine professionals' attitudes to type 2 diabetes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References