Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Spaceflight is ingrained in the imagination as a state-of-the-art technology. Its level of sophistication and intricacy is unparalleled.The space industry, with its large budgets and few producers, has been able to maintain a craft mentality in the face of the hi-tech ethos of mass production. One striking example of this craft mentality is a relative lack of industry-wide standards for the design and operation of satellites. This article discusses standards-setting in the space industry, suggesting that thus far the industry has often resisted imposing standards in favor of customization. Given the maturation of on-orbit servicing technology and future shift from astronaut-assisted repair to semi-autonomous robotic repair, the lack of interoperability standards is increasingly problematic. How, what, and when to standardize, as well as who makes this decision, is an organizational question that has significant consequences for the future of satellite design and the operation of the space industry. It is thus important to be mindful of the current context of outer space and spaceflight, as well as to consider which lessons from human on-orbit servicing may provide insights for the development of a robotic on-orbit servicing infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apollo 13 Review Board. 1970. Report of Apollo 13 Review Board. NASA.

Baldwin, C. , and K. Clark. 2000. Design rules: The power of modularity . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cuplin, L. , and W. Chun. 2000. Satellite servicing and space logistics. AIAA Space 2000. Long Beach, CA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

DeRitis, E. 1996. Lockheed Martin leveraging satellite experience to meet demand for space-based information and services. Business Wire, 6 September. [online] http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1996_Sept_6/ai_18654678

Goodman, J. 2006. History of Space Shuttle rendezvous and proximity operations . Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 43(5): 944-959.

Harland, D.M. 2004. The story of the Space Shuttle. London : Springer Press.

Hastings, D. , E. Lamassoure , A. Weigel , and J. Saleh. 2001. Policy enablers for the development of a space-based infrastructure. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 63: 123-138.

Hobby, R. 1998. An introduction to the Iridium® system. IEE Colloquium on Communication Opportunities Offered by Advanced Satellite Systems, London.

Hounshell, D.A. 1984. From the American system to mass production, 1800-1932: The development of manufacturing technology in the United States. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

10.

Joppin, C. 2004. On-Orbit servicing for satellite upgrades. Master’s dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

11.

Luscko, D. 2005. Manufacturing muscle: The hot rod industry and the American fascination with speed, 1915-1984. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

12.

McCurdy, H. 1993. Inside NASA: High technology and organizational change in the U.S. space program. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

13.

McDougall, W.A. 1985. … The Heavens and the Earth: A political history of the space age. New York: Basic Books.

14.

Miller, J. , J. Guerrero , and D. Goldstein. 2002. SpaceFrame: Modular spacecraft building blocks for plug and play spacecraft. AIAA Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT.

15.

Mindell, D. 2008. Digital Apollo: Human and machine in spaceflight. Cambridge: MIT Press.

16.

Murman, E. , T. Allen , and K. Bozdogan. 2002. Lean enterprise value: Insight’s from MIT’s lean aerospace initiative. New York: Palgrave.

17.

Nasa. 1982. Space Shuttle Mission STS-5 press kit. Release No. 82-156.

18.

NASA Office of Space Flight. 1988. Satellite Servicing: A NASA report to Congress. NASA.

19.

National Research Council. 2004. Assessment of Options of Extending the Life of the Hubble Space Telescope: Final Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

20.

Pew Research Center for the People & The Press. 1999. 1999 Millennium survey. [online] http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=285

21.

Reynerson, C. 2001. Spacecraft servicing: First order model for feasibility and cost effectiveness. AIAA Space 2001 , Albuquerque, NM.

22.

Sabel, Z. and J. Zeitlin. 1985. Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization. Past and Present 108: 133-176.

23.

Shah, N. 2004. Modularity as an enabler for evolutionary acquisition. Master’s dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

24.

Smith, M.L. 1983. Selling the Moon: The US manned space program and the triumph of commodity scientism. In The Culture of Consumption , ed. R.W. Fox and T.J. Lears , 196. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

25.

Smith, M.R. 1977. Harpers ferry armory and the new technology: The challenge of change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

26.

Union of Concerned Scientists. 2009. UCS satellite database. [online] http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_global_security/space_weapons/technical_issues/ucs-satellite-database.html

27.

Wheelon, Albert. 1987. A ‘born again’ space program. International Security 11: 142-150.

28.

Woods, Brian. 2003. NASA, Post-Apollo and the rise of the Space Shuttle: A glance at the definition of a launch vehicle. SATSU Working Paper N27.

Standards in the space industry: Looking back,looking forward

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References