Past work in politically charged domains has revealed a blame-game dynamic in how historical observers think about counterfactual scenarios. Our working hypothesis, however, is that business historians will prove less ideologically polarized into rival communities of co-believers and more likely to treat disputes over causation as matters of degree. Early data indicate that, although exceptions exist, counterfactual reasoning about business history is indeed moderated by widespread faith that: (a) it is difficult to delay the advance of scientific knowledge and its translation into useful technology; (b) quasi-rational actors operating in competitive markets will bring history back onto the `equilibrium path' quite quickly. We trace these differences to the weaker incentives for finger-pointing, the stronger influence of sociology-of-science work documenting the commonness of`multiples' in discovery, and the predominance of economic and game-theoretic models.
Berlin, I.1997. The hedgehog and the fox. In The proper study of mankind, 436—498. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
2.
Blumenstein, R., and P. Grant.2004. On the hook: Former chief tries to redeem the calls he made at AT&T; As he retires, Armstrong blames industry fraud for breakup of company; `History isn't always right'. Wall Street Journal (May 26, 2004).
3.
Booth, C.2003. Does history matter in strategy? The possibilities and problems of counterfactual analysis. Management Decision41: 96—104.
4.
Carr, E.H.1961. What is history?London: Penguin.
5.
Chandler, Jr., A.D.1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal.1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35: 128—152.
7.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss.1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13: 3—21.
8.
Cowley, R., ed. 2000. What if?: The world's foremost military historians imagine what might have been. New York: Putnam.
9.
Cowley, R., ed. 2001. What if? 2: Eminent historians imagine what might have been. New York: Putnam.
10.
Cowley, R., ed. 2003. What ifs? of American history. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.
11.
David, P.A.1997. Path dependence and the quest for historical economics: One more chorus of the ballad of QWERTY. Discussion papers in Economic and Social History, No. 20, University of Oxford, Oxford.
12.
Fearon, J.1991. Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science . World Politics43: 474—484.
Fischhoff, B.1975. Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1: 288—299.
15.
Fogel, R.1964. Railroads and American economic growth: Essays in econometric history. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Fogel, R.1994. Economic growth, population theory, and physiology: The bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. The American Economic Review84: 369—395.
17.
Glaser, B.G. and A.L. Strauss.1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
18.
Hawkins, S. and R. Hastie.1990. Hindsight: Biased judgment of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin107: 311—327.
19.
Kwon, S.2006. Former HP CEO tells all in CBS 5 interview. www.cbs.com (October 19, 2006).
20.
Langley, A.1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review24: 691—710.
21.
March, J.G.1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning . Organization Science2: 71—87.
22.
Merton, R.1961. Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society55: 470—486.
23.
Mokyr, J.2006. King Kong and cold fusion: Counterfactual analysis and the history of technology. In Unmaking the west: `What-if' scenarios that rewrite world history, eds. P.E. Tetlock, R. Lebow and G. Parker, 277—322. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
24.
Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change . Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press .
25.
Taleb, N.N.2007. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York, NY: Random House.
26.
Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen.1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management . Strategic Management Journal18: 509—534.
27.
Tetlock, P.E.1998. Close-call counterfactuals and belief system defenses: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75: 639—652.
28.
Tetlock, P.E.1999. Theory-driven reasoning about possible pasts and probable futures: Are we prisoners of our preconceptions?American Journal of Political Science43: 335—366.
29.
Tetlock, P.E.2005. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Tetlock, P.E., and A. Belkin.1996. Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Tetlock, P.E., and E. Henik.2005. Theory- versus imagination-driven thinking about historical counterfactuals: Are we prisoners of our preconceptions? In The psychology of counterfactual thinking, eds. D.R. Mandel, D.J. Hilton and P. Catellani, 199—216. London: Routledge.
32.
Tetlock, P.E., and R.N. Lebow.2001. Poking counterfactual holes in covering laws: Cognitive styles and historical reasoning. American Political Science Review95: 829—843.
33.
Tetlock, P.E., and G. Parker.2006. Counterfactual thought experiments: Why we can't live with them and how we must learn to live with them. In Unmaking the west: `What-if' scenarios that rewrite world history , eds. P.E. Tetlock, R. Lebow and G. Parker , 14—44. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
34.
Tetlock, P.E., and P. Visser.2000. Thinking about Russia: Possible pasts and probable futures. British Journal of Social Psychology39: 173—196.
35.
Tetlock, P.E., R.N. Lebow , and G. Parker, eds. 2006. Unmaking the west: `What-if' scenarios that rewrite world history. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Trevor-Roper, H.R., 1981. History and imagination. In History and imagination: Essays in honour of H. R. Trevor-Roper, eds. H. Lloyd-Jones, V. Pearl and B. Worden.London: Duckworth.
