Evaluating the feasibility of a co-produced,bespoke dementia education programme for formal caregivers of individuals with intellectual disability

Abstract

Dementia education programmes for formal caregivers of people with intellectual disability are limited. This study was not designed or powered to evaluate effectiveness, but to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of outcome measures for a co-produced dementia education programme within intellectual disability services. A mixed-methods, quasi-experimental feasibility study was conducted with 40 formal caregivers recruited from supported living and residential providers across four NHS Trusts in the Northwest of England. The programme comprised interactive modules, case studies, group discussion, and practical tools to support the management of dementia-related behaviours and promote person-centred care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, acceptability, and completion of outcome measures. The dementia education programme was feasible and acceptable with only minor modifications. Recruitment and retention were good, with 100% completion of follow-up outcome measures, supporting the suitability of the programme and study procedures for future research.

Keywords

learning disabilities dementia training Alzheimer’s disease feasibility co-design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acton

Jaydeokar

Jones

(2023). Dementia education and training for caregivers supporting older people with intellectual disability: a scoping review of the literature. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 6. doi:10.1108/AMHID-02-2023-0006

Auer

Graessel

Viereckl

, et al. (2015). Professional Care Team Burden (PCTB) scale - reliability, validity and factor analysis. Health and quality of life outcomes, 13(1), 17. doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0199-8

Boyle

Harris

(2009). The challenge of co-production. London: new economics foundation, 56, 18.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cleary

Doody

(2017). Professional carers' experiences of caring for individuals with intellectual disability and dementia. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 21(1), 68-86. doi:10.1177/1744629516638245

Dennehy

Allen

A. P.

McGlinchey

, et al. (2023). A scoping review of post-diagnostic dementia supports for people with intellectual disability. Aging & Mental Health, 27(8), 1456-1465. doi:10.1080/13607863.2022.2130171

Farr

(2018). Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes. Critical Social Policy, 38(4), 623-644. doi:10.1177/0261018317747444

Goh

A. M. Y.

Doyle

Gaffy

, et al. (2022). Co-designing a dementia-specific education and training program for home care workers: The ‘Promoting Independence Through Quality Dementia Care at Home’ project. Dementia, 21(3), 899-917. doi:10.1177/14713012211065377

Griffiths

Robertson

Kaviraj

, et al. (2024). Reflections on co-production: Developing a dementia research funding application with a diverse lived experience group. Dementia, 23(5), 709-723. doi:10.1177/14713012241231916

10.

Herron

D. L.

Priest

H. M.

Read

(2020). Supporting people with an intellectual disability and dementia: A constructivist grounded theory study exploring care providers’ views and experiences in the UK. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(6), 1405-1417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12768

11.

Hewitt

Langdon

P. E.

Tapp

, et al. (2023). A systematic review and narrative synthesis of inclusive health and social care research with people with intellectual disabilities: How are co‐researchers involved and what are their experiences? JARID. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities/Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 36(4), 681-701. doi:10.1111/jar.13100

12.

Kessler

R. C.

Andrews

Colpe

L. J.

, et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological medicine, 32(6), 959-976. doi:10.1017/S0033291702006074

13.

Kilgannon

O'Reilly

Noone

, et al. (2024). Utilising a Co-Design Approach to Strategically Plan Dementia Education for Diverse Populations in Ireland. Age and ageing, 53(Supplement_4). doi:10.1093/ageing/afae178.225

14.

Maren

Paul

Peter

, et al.. (2016). Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(7), 509. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315

15.

Mukoro

(2023). How Co-production is used to improve the quality of services and people’s experiences of care: A literature review. NHS England. Available online at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/how-co-production-is-used-to-improve-the-quality-ofservices-and-peoples-experience-of-care-a-literature-review/#point-of-care-requirementscreating-the-conditions-for-genuine-co-production-at-point-of-care [last accessed 11-06-2023].

16.

NHS England and C4PC . (2020). A Co-production Model. Retrieved from https://www.england.nhs.uk/always-events/co-production/

17.

Nordin

Kjellstrom

Robert

, et al. (2023). Measurement and outcomes of co-production in health and social care: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMJ open, 13(9), e073808-e073808. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073808

18.

Petner-Arrey

Copeland

S. R.

(2015). 'You have to care.' perceptions of promoting autonomy in support settings for adults with intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 38-48. doi:10.1111/bld.12084

19.

Redley

(2019). Ageing and increased longevity amongst people with intellectual disabilities: an editorial. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 20(4), 157-161. doi:10.1108/QAOA-12-2019-066

20.

Schepers

A. K.

Orrell

Shanahan

, et al. (2012). Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff (SCIDS) scale: development, reliability, and validity. International Psychogeriatrics, 24(7), 1153-1162. doi:10.1017/S104161021100247X

21.

Sim

Lewis

(2012). The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 65(3), 301-308. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011

22.

Strydom

Chan

King

, et al. (2013). Incidence of dementia in older adults with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(6), 1881-1885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.021

23.

Surr

C. A.

Gates

Irving

, et al. (2017). Effective Dementia Education and Training for the Health and Social Care Workforce: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of educational research, 87(5), 966-1002. doi:10.3102/0034654317723305

24.

Surr

C. A.

Parveen

Smith

S. J.

, et al. (2020). The barriers and facilitators to implementing dementia education and training in health and social care services: a mixed-methods study. BMC health services research, 20(1), 512. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05382-4

25.

Thorgrimsen

Selwood

Spector

, et al. (2003). Whose quality of life is it anyway? The validity and reliability of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders, 17(4), 201. Retrieved from https://go.exlibris.link/MWwzfVTX

26.

Williams

Porter

(2017). The Meaning of ‘choice and control’ for People with Intellectual Disabilities who are Planning their Social Care and Support. JARID. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities/Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 30(1), 97-108. doi:10.1111/jar.12222

27.

World Health Organisation . (2022). International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. Retrieved from: https://icd.who.int/en