Coffee talks: Positive effects of a friendly visitor program on pragmatic competence and language production skills in adults with intellectual disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Coffee talks: Positive effects of a friendly visitor program on pragmatic competence and language production skills in adults with intellectual disabilities
Background: The prevalence of limited communication abilities in adults with intellectual disabilities is high with adverse effects on social participation. To address their limited opportunities to engage in conversational interchanges, along with the shortage of professional workforce in many rehabilitation settings, we considered a volunteer-based program to enhance communication abilities. Method: In this preliminary study we employed a Friendly Visitor program, in which a group of four women (27-33 years-old) with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities were visited weekly for three months by a group of visitors, forming an unstructured social group. Results: Following the meetings, improvements were found for the participants in several pragmatic skills (conversational competence, e.g., initiation, asking questions) and language production abilities (e.g., the number of two-word-utterances). Conclusions: Such effects may promote independence, reduce isolation, and increase integration and quality of life. Further studies with larger samples and more rigorous designs are needed to confirm these initial findings.
AbbedutoLMcDuffieAThurmanAJKoverST (2016). Language development in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: From phenotypes to treatments. In: International review of research in developmental disabilities, (50, pp. 71–118). Academic Press.
2.
AliAMckenzieEHassiotisAPriebeSLloyd-EvansBOmarRKingM (2020). One-to-one befriending for people with intellectual disability and symptoms of depression: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 10(6), e033989.
3.
BarnhillJMcNelisD (2012). Overview of intellectual/developmental disabilities. Focus, 10(3), 300–307.
4.
Ben DavidNLotanMMoranDS (2022a). How can Speech Therapists improve medical services of adults with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD)?Dash Bareshet, 41, 56–67. (In Hebrew).
5.
Ben-DavidNLotanMMoranDS (2022b). A new screening tool for rapid diagnosis of functional and environmental factors influencing adults with intellectual disabilities. Diagnostics, 12(12), 2991.
6.
Ben-DavidNLotanMMoranDS (2022c). Development and validation of a functional screening tool for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 1–16.
7.
BogatGAJasonLA (1983). An evaluation of two visiting programs for elderly community residents. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 17(4), 267–280.
8.
BoardmanLBernalJHollinsS (2014). Communicating with people with intellectual disabilities: a guide for general psychiatrists. Advances in psychiatric treatment, 20(1), 27–36.
9.
ButterfieldNArthurM (1995). Shifting the focus: Emerging priorities in communication programming for students with a severe intellectual disability. In Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 41-50.
10.
ChannellMMMattieLJ (2023). The interaction between social and communication skills in individuals with intellectual disability. In International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, (64, pp. 1–49). Academic Press.
11.
DamianakisTWagnerLMBernsteinSMarzialiE (2007). Volunteers' experiences visiting the cognitively impaired in nursing homes: A friendly visiting program. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 26(4), 343–356.
12.
DeDeGHooverEMaasE (2019). Two to tango or the more the merrier? A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group size in aphasia conversation treatment on standardized tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(5), 1437–1451.
13.
DonovanR. (2022). An Investigation of ‘Restrictive Practices’ within Services for Adults with an Intellectual Disability: Perspectives of Professionals and those involved with their care. Theses [online]: Munster Technological University. Available at: https://sword.cit.ie/allthe/552
14.
EisenmanLTFreedmanBKofkeM (2017). Focus on friendship: Relationships, inclusion, and social well-being. In Handbook of positive psychology in intellectual and developmental disabilities: Translating research into practice127-144.
15.
EnderbyPPickstoneCJohnAFryerKCantrellAPapaioannouD (2009). Resource manual for commissioning and planning services for speech, language and communication needs. London, England: Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.
16.
Fernandez-VillardonAAlvarezPUgaldeLTelladoI (2020). Fostering the social development of children with special educational needs or disabilities (SEND) through dialogue and interaction: a literature review. Social Sciences, 9(6), 97.
17.
GarcíaJCDíezEWojcikDZSantamaríaM (2020). Communication support needs in adults with intellectual disabilities and its relation to quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7370.
18.
GerenserJFormanBChildTS (2007). Speech and language deficits in children with developmental disabilities. In Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities pp. 563-579. Boston, MA: Springer US.
19.
GilmoreLCuskellyM (2014). Vulnerability to loneliness in people with intellectual disability: An explanatory model. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(3), 192–199.
20.
GordonBAMiceliCBYankeelovPACottonSGFaulAC (2024). Virtual friendly visitor program: Combatting loneliness in community dwelling older adults. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1440465.
21.
HaganLThompsonH (2014). It's good to talk: developing the communication skills of an adult with an intellectual disability through augmentative and alternative communication. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 66–73.
22.
HalperinIShupacAMoradMMerrickJ (2005). Health policy for persons with intellectual disability: Experiences from Israel. The Scientific World Journal, 5, 71–92.
23.
HarrisonRABradshawJForrester-JonesRMcCarthyMSmithS (2021). Social networks and people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(4), 973–992.
24.
HattonC (1998). Pragmatic language skills in people with intellectual disabilities: A review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 23(1), 79–100.
25.
HofmannVMüllerCM (2021). Language skills and social contact among students with intellectual disabilities in special needs schools. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100534.
26.
HooverEMcFeeADeDeG (2020). Efficacy of group conversation intervention in individuals with severe profiles of aphasia. Seminars in speech and language, 41(1), 71–82.
27.
IchtM (2019). Introducing the Beatalk method: Using beatbox sounds and rhythms to improve speech characteristics of adults with intellectual disability. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 54(3), 401–416.
28.
IchtMCarlM (2022). Positive effects of the Beatalk technique on speech characteristics of young adults with intellectual disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–5.
29.
IchtMBen-DavidNMamaY (2021a). Using Vocal Production to Improve Long-Term Verbal Memory in Adults with Intellectual Disability. Behavior Modification, 45(5), 715–739.
30.
IchtMWiznitser Ressis-TalHLotanM (2021b). Can the vocal expression of intellectually disabled individuals be used as a pain indicator? Initial findings supporting a possible novice assessment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 2926.
31.
JacksonIDagnanDGoldingLRayner-SmithK (2024). How do people with intellectual disabilities understand friendship? A systematic meta-synthesis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 37(4), e13244.
32.
JohnsonHDouglasJBigbyCIaconoT (2012). Social interaction with adults with severe intellectual disability: Having fun and hanging out. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(4), 329–341.
33.
KatsarouDAndreouG (2017). Receptive and expressive semantic skills in children with Down syndrome. International Education and Research Journal, 3(3), 135–136.
34.
KleitschEWhitmanTSantosJ (1983). Increasing verbal interaction among elderly socially isolated mentally retarded adults: a group language training procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(2), 217–233.
35.
LaermansJ.ScheersH.VandekerckhoveP.De BuckE. (2023). Friendly visiting by a volunteer for reducing loneliness or social isolation in older adults: A systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews, 19(4), e1359.
36.
LeafJBFergusonJLMilneCCihonJH (2020). Social behavior for individuals with intellectual disabilities and dual diagnosis: Common deficits and assessment tools. In Handbook of Dual Diagnosis: Assessment and Treatment in Persons with Intellectual Disorders pp. 411–427.
37.
LovellDJonesREphraimG (1998). The effect of intensive interaction on the sociability of a man with severe intellectual disabilities. The International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 22, 3–8.
38.
McConkeyRMorrisIPurcellM (1999). Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. Journal of Intellectual disability research, 43(3), 194–205.
39.
McLeodS (2018). Communication rights: Fundamental human rights for all. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 3–11.
40.
MoneyD (1997). A comparison of three approaches to delivering a speech and language therapy service to people with learning disabilities. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32(4), 449–466.
41.
MoneyD (2016). Inclusive Communication and the Role of Speech and Language Therapy Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Position Paper. London: RCSLT.
42.
MoneyDThurmanS (2002). Towards a Model of Inclusive Communication. In Speech and Language Therapy in Practice Autumn pp. 4–6.
43.
PurcellMMcConkeyRMorrisI (2000). Staff communication with people with intellectual disabilities: The impact of a work-based training programme. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(1), 147–158.
44.
ReinkeBJHolmesDSDenneyNW (1981). Influence of a “friendly visitor” program on the cognitive functioning and morale of elderly persons. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 491.
45.
RobinsonSIdleJ (2023). Loneliness and how to counter it: People with intellectual disability share their experiences and ideas. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 48(1), 58–70.
46.
ShadyKPhillipsSNewmanS (2022). Barriers and Facilitators to Healthcare Access in Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disorders and Communication Difficulties: an Integrative Review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–13.
47.
SchalockRLLuckassonRTasséMJ (2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (12th ed.) Washington, DC.
48.
SimplicanSCLeaderGKosciulekJLeahyM (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in developmental disabilities, 38, 18–29.
49.
VicariSCaselliMCTonucciF (2000). Asynchrony of lexical and morphosyntactic development in children with Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 38(5), 634–644.
50.
Vlot-van AnrooijKKoks-LeensenMCvan der CruijsenAJansenHvan der VeldenKLeusinkGNaaldenbergJ (2020). How can care settings for people with intellectual disabilities embed health promotion?Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(6), 1489–1499.
51.
WoodSStandenP (2021). Is speech and language therapy effective at improving the communication of adults with intellectual disabilities?: A systematic review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(2), 435–450.
