Barriers and facilitators to implementing transition services for students with intellectual disabilities in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A systematic review

Abstract

In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a deficiency exists in comprehensive assessments of transitional programs and services tailored for students with intellectual disabilities. The present research is a systematic review to discuss the barriers to planning and implementing transitional services for students with intellectual disabilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and possible facilitators. Consequently, a thorough systematic review and exploration were conducted across ERIC - ProQuest, Education Journals - ProQuest, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Scopus. The findings spotlighted various barriers from the perspective of stakeholders, categorising them as educational, familial, societal, and functional barriers. Among these, educational obstacles emerged as the most significant challenges impeding the employment prospects of students with intellectual disabilities. The results further disclosed several suggested facilitators to address these challenges, encompassing educational interventions and collaborative practices. This study furnishes decision-makers in the Kingdom, along with professionals in the realm of special education and parents, with valuable insights into the prevailing challenges illuminated by recent studies in the field, as well as the most prominent proposed solutions.

Keywords

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia students with intellectual disabilities systematic review transition services

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abu-Alghayth

K. M.

Catania

Semon

Lane

Cranston-Gingras

(2022) A brief history of special education policy on the inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 50(2): 178–187.

Alanazi

(2018) The difficulties witnessed by people with intellectual disability in transition to work in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences 12(4): 527–536.

AlHarbi

Talafha

(2023) The level of transitional services provided to students with intellectual disabilities from the Perspective of their teachers in of Mecca City. Journal of Special Education 12 (42): 3–40.

AlDosari

(2016) Transition to work for people with disabilities from school to work. Journal of Educational Sciences 1(3): 212–242.

AlDosari

(2017) Educators’, leaders’, and parents’ perceptions, knowledge, and use of secondary transition evidence-based practices for students with intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis, Washington State University, USA.

Aldosari

Alzhrani

(2024) Evaluating Saudi Parental Interagency on Collaborative Initiatives for Successful Post-Secondary Transition of Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241262565

AlDosari

AlAlmalki

(2022) The reality of coordination between intellectual education teachers and supervisors in providing transitional services in Riyadh city. Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Education - Assiut University 38 (3): 296–334.

AlSharbi

AlHuwaiti

(2022) The reality of transitional services provided to female students with intellectual disabilities in the secondary stage in Taif city: A qualitative study. Diyala Journal of Human Research (91): 483–543.

AlShuail

(2023) Services for preparing students with intellectual and developmental disabilities for the post-school stage. King Faisal University Journal of Humanities and Administrative Sciences 24(2): 79–86.

10.

AlAtawi

(2020) Evaluation of the transitional services in integration programs for mental retardation in Tabuk city according to evaluator (parents - teachers). Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation 10(36): 49–79.

11.

AlGhubaishi

Hanafi

(2022) Obstacles to providing transitional services for students with intellectual disabilities from the point of view of teachers in Jeddah. Journal of Educational and Qualitative Research 11(11): 53–87.

12.

AlFawzan

AlRawi

(2018) Revealing the hindrances of transitional programs of female students with intellectual disabilities in Asir region. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation 7(27): 34–73.

13.

AlFawzan

AlRawi

(2019) Transitional programs presented to students with intellectual disabilities from central region teachers’ point of view. International Specialized Educational Journal 8(6): 43–51.

14.

AlFawzan

AlQahtani

(2022) universal design for transition to post-secondary school for female students with intellectual disabilities from the perspective of their teachers. Journal of Scientific Research in Education 23(5): 62–87.

15.

AlQahtani

Alquraini

(2017) The use of transitional plans in studentized educational programs for students with intellectual disability in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Sciences 29(3): 409–433.

16.

Alquraini

(2017) Factors that affect the provision of transition services to students with multiples disabilities in their institutions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational Research 41(1): 1–38.

17.

Alquraini

(2018). Transitional programs and services for students with disabilities in light of global practices. Dar Al-Zahraa.

18.

AlQudah

AlOtaibi

(2022) Evaluating the reality of transitional services of intellectual disabilities according to Parents’ perspectives in Makkah. Tikrit University Journal of Human Sciences 29(5): 342–369.

19.

Al-Leqani

AlDakhil

(2019) Obstacles of the implementation of transitional services for students with mild intellectual disabilities in secondary school. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences 11(1): 1–42.

20.

Almalki

(2020) Components of transition services in the studentized education program for students with an intellectual disability. Saudi Journal of Special Education (13): 115–140.

21.

Almorgi

Alasim

(2023) Obstacles to the participation of families of students with intellectual disabilities in transitional programs in the city of Riyadh. Journal of Political and Administrative Sciences - Majmaah University (32): 64–94.

22.

Almalki

(2021) Transition services for high school students with intellectual disability in Saudi Arabia: Issues and recommendations. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities 68(6): 1–9.

23.

Almugren

(2020) stakeholders’ (teachers’, parents’ and employers’) perspectives of school to workforce transition services for students with mild intellectual disabilities in a large urban city in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis, Concordia University Chicago, USA.

24.

Almutairi

(2018) Teachers and practitioners’ perceptions of transition services for females with intellectual disability in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis, University of Northern Colorado, USA.

25.

Alnahdi

(2012) Teachers’ attitudes and perceptions toward transition services from school to work for students with mild intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis, Ohio University, USA.

26.

Alnahdi

(2013) Transition services for students with mild intellectual disability in Saudi Arabia. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 48(4): 531–544.

27.

Alnahdi

G. H.

Alwadei

Alharbi

(2024) Enhancing special education programs’ curricula for students with intellectual disabilities in saudi arabia: A call for personalized approaches and inclusive practices. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 151, 104785.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104785

28.

AlNaim

(2024). Perceptions of professors in special education departments in Saudi public universities about the opportunities for students with intellectual disabilities to join university education: A conceptual framework. Educational Journal, 38(151), 181-212.

29.

Cimera

Burgess

Bedesem

(2014) Does providing transition services by age 14 produce better vocational outcomes for students with intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 39(1): 47–54.

30.

Deardorff

(2020) The effects of professional development on transition plan components PhD Thesis, University of Oklahoma, USA.

31.

Disabled Welfare Law (2000) Ministry of human resources and social development. Available at: https://www.hrsd.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2015-07/Disabledcaresystem.pdf (accessed 10 January 2021).

32.

Ellenkamp

Brouwers

Embregts

Joosen

Van Weeghel

(2016) Work environment-related factors in obtaining and maintaining work in a competitive employment setting for employees with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of occupational rehabilitation 26(1): 56–69.

33.

Foley

Dyke

Girdler

Bourke

Leonard

(2012) Young adults with intellectual disability transitioning from school to post- school: A literature review framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation 34(20): 1747–1764.

34.

Gargiulo

Bouck

(2016) Instructional Strategies for Students With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Intellectual Disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

35.

Kohler

Field

(2003) Transition-Focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education 37(3): 174–183.

36.

Meadows

Davies

Beamish

(2014) Teacher control over interagency collaboration: A roadblock for effective transitioning of youth with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61(4), 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.955788

37.

Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development (2019) Ministerial Resolution to include persons with disabilities in the program to encourage establishments to localize Nitaqat. https://www.hrsd.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2019-07/5%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%85156563%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%A1%D9%85%D8%A9%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%93%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B7%D8%A9%D9%88%D9%86%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA1440.pdf

38.

Ministry of Education in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2002) Regulatory rules for special education institutes and programs. General Secretariat for Special Education.

39.

Ministry of Education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2015) The Organizational and Procedural Guide for Special Education Institutes and Programs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Project for the Development of Public Education.

40.

Plotner

A. J.

Dymond

S. K

(2017) How vocational rehabilitation transition specialists influence curricula for students with severe disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 60(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355215626699

41.

Plotner

A. J.

Walters

C. B.

Gonzalez

(2022) Exploring special education and Center for Independent Living professional beliefs on collaboration and the value-based principles that drive secondary transition service delivery. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 34(4), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221131284

42.

Rooney

(2016) Transition-Age youth with intellectual disabilities: Providers’ perspectives on improving postschool outcomes. Master Thesis, St. Catherine University, USA.

43.

Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 (2016) Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030. Available at: https://vision2030.gov.sa/download/file/fid/422 (accessed 13 March 2010).

44.

Scott, L., & Puglia, L (2018) Special education teachers’ perceptions of linking academics with transition goals and the Universal Design for Transition framework. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 49(3): 287–298.

45.

Scott

Saddler

Thoma

Bartholomew

Virginia

Tamura

(2011) Universal Design for Transition: A Single Subject Research Study on the Impact of UDT on Student Achievement, Engagement and Interest. Journal on Educational Psychology, 4(4), 21-32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102324.pdf

46.

Scott

Thoma

Puglia

Temple

D’Aguilar

(2017) Implementing a UDL framework: A study of current personnel preparation practices. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.25

47.

Scott

Bruno

(2018) Universal Design for Transition: A Conceptual Framework for Blending Academics and Transition Instruction. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1075

48.

System of Rights of Persons With Disabilities (2023). The experts committee of the council of ministers. Available at: https://laws.boe.gov.sa/BoeLaws/Laws/LawDetails/e52b691a-785c-42a7-8916-b07d00e4fd38/1. (accessed 01 January 2023).

49.

The Ministry of Education (2006) Disabled care system in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Almarefh 133: 46–51.

50.

Thoma

Bartholomew

Scott

(2009) Universal design for transition: A roadmap for planning and instruction. Paul H Brookes Publishing.

51.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

White

Richter

Walker

(2009) Evidence-based secondary transition practices for enhancing school completion. Exceptionality, 17(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830802590144

52.

Test

Shanley

(2017) Introduction to the special issue on combining transition skills and academic instruction. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416688441

53.

Thoma, C., Cain, I., Wojcik, A., Best, K., & Scott, L (2016) Universal design for transition for students on the autism spectrum. Autism Spectrum Disorders: Identification, Education, and Treatment. Roultledge, 285.

54.

US Department of Education (2020) A transition guide to postsecondary education and employment for students and youth with disabilities. Available at: https://sites.ed.gov/idea/idea-files/policy-guidance-transition-guide-postsecondary-education-employment-students-youth-disabilities-august-2020/. (accessed 09 April 2024).