Understanding the contribution of intellectual disabilities nurses: Paper 3 of 4

Abstract

The overall objective of this research was to identify intellectual disability nursing interventions and their impact on the health and healthcare of people with intellectual disability. This is part 3 of a 4-part series. In this paper we report the findings from quantitative questions from an online survey of intellectual disability nurses. The objective of this part of the study was to a evaluate intellectual disability nurses’ confidence in their understanding of the interventions they undertook. Quantitative data was collected using an online survey questionnaire from a voluntary response and snowball sample of 230 participants from 7 countries. Thematic, descriptive statistical, and inferential statistical analyses were undertaken. The evaluation data suggest and demonstrate a lack of clarity among intellectual disability nurses of the interventions they can effectively undertake. There appears to be correlations between lack of role clarity and the types of employer organisations and countries. Further work need to be undertaken by nurse leaders ascertain and address this lack of clarity.

Keywords

intellectual disability effectuating nursing procedures enhancing impact enhancing quality of life nursing procedures

Introduction and Background

This is part 3 of a 4-part series. The overall aim of the research was to identify nursing led interventions that are in place to address the challenging and changing needs of people with intellectual disability. Paper 1 reports the findings from the scoping literature review that was undertaken between 1 February 2020 and 31 May 2020. Paper 2 reports the findings from an online cross-sectional survey of intellectual disability nurses that identified 5 major themes of nursing interventions; effectuating nursing procedures, enhancing impact of intellectuality disability services, enhancing impact of mainstream services, enhancing quality of life, and enhancing intellectual disability nursing practice. In this paper we report the findings from evaluation questions of an online survey of intellectual disability and other nurses working with people with intellectual disabilities understood these interventions. The objective of this part of the study was to a evaluate intellectual disability nurses’ confidence in their understanding of the interventions they undertook. We also sought to understand the factors that influenced interventions undertaken by these nurses within diverse settings across the lifespan.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council of the United Kingdom and the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland offer pre-registration intellectual disability nursing programmes and in the Netherlands students can choose to specialise in intellectual disability in the 4^th year of a generic programme (Robinson & Griffiths, 2007). In other countries such as Australia, New Zealand and United States of America (USA) pre-registration nursing programmes have intellectual disability (Trollor et al., 2016). In countries like the USA and Canada, there are post-registration courses for nurses working with people with intellectual disability. Internationally, the role of intellectual disability nursing varies significantly but it is evident that the specialist knowledge and skills are essential in enhancing the delivery of person-centred care that improve health outcomes for people with intellectual disability (Brown et al., 2016).

The provision of health and healthcare services to people with intellectual disability is opportunistic. This is despite evidence that point to a need for specific and targeted interventions to achieve better outcomes (Chauhan et al., 2010; McIlfatrick et al., 2011; Robertson et. al., 2014), despite evidence demonstrating that preventative nursing interventions are effective in identifying the health needs of people with intellectual disability (Emerson et al., 2011; Robertson et. al., 2014). These nurses need to deliver effective nursing care to people with intellectual disability in challenging circumstances (Thomas & Kerr, 2011). This is also contrary to the the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability (United Nations, 2006), which stipulates that people with intellectual disability have the right to the highest attainable standard of health.

The avoidable disparities resulting from poor access to health services that are experienced by people with intellectual disability (Hatton and Emerson, 2015; Kavanagh et al., 2017; Kerr, 2004; LeDer, 2020; Straetmans, et al., 2007). These could be improved through appropriate nursing interventions (Campbell & Martin, 2009). It is unclear how intellectual disability nurses who work with people with intellectual disability perceive their preparedness and effectiveness of the interventions they undertake.

People with intellectual disability are known to have much greater health needs than those of comparable age groups who do not have intellectual disability (Backer et al., 2009), and experience preventable higher mortality rates (LeDeR, 2020). They are more likely to be dependent on others for their health and healthcare outcomes (Campbell & Martin, 2009). Their healthcare outcomes could be improved through appropriate nursing interventions (Ouellette-Kuntz, 2005). It could therefore be argued that nurses working with this population need to have clarity and confidence in the interventions they can undertake to improve outcomes for people with intellectual disability.

McCarron et al. (2018) identified liaison in maternity services, providing psychosocial support, and health promotion as some of the interventions that could be undertaken by intellectual disability nurses when working with pregnant women with intellectual disability. Northway et al. (2017) suggested that intellectual disability nurses could be involved in pre-natal screening and provide support in relation to diagnosis.

Interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses in their work with children include pain assessment, objective clinical assessments, and parent consultation in school environments (Quinn & Smolinski, 2018), promoting health and wellbeing settings (Delahunty, 2017; Marshall et al., 2003; Northway et al., 2017), and, identifying children with potential intellectual disability, linking between schools and other services, facilitating transition from nursery into school or transition into adult services, identifying children who should be prioritised for further intellectual disability assessment, and monitoring children’s development (Delahunty, 2017).

Existing literatures have identified a number of interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses when working with adults with intellectual disability (Barr et al., 1999; Brown et al., 2016; Brown et al., 2012; Campbell, 2011; Dalgarno & Riordan, 2014; Drozd & Clinch, 2016; Lee & Kiemle, 2014; Llewellyn, 2005; Lloyd & Coulson, 2014; Llewellyn & Northway, 2007; Lovell & Bailey, 2016; Lovell et al., 2014; MacArthur et al., 2015; McKeon, 2009; Marsham, 2012; Mason & Phipps, 2010; Pennington et al., 2019; Ring et al., 2018; Slevin & Sines, 2005; Taggart et al., 2011). These interventions include managing epilepsy and complex epilepsy (Auberry & Cullen, 2016; Pennington et al., 2019; Ring et al., 2018), preventing crisis (Lovell & Bailey, 2016), and undertaking psychological interventions (Campbell, 2011; Dalgarno and Riordan, 2014; Lee and Kiemle, 2014; Lovell et al., 2015; Mason & Phipps, 2010; McKeon, 2009). These interventions suggest that the intellectual disability nurses are highly skilled and have a very wide range of behaviours, skills, attitudes, and beliefs (Dalgarno & Riordan, 2014; Lovell et al., 2014). What is also clear from current studies is that intellectual disability nurses practice in a complex and non-condition specific clinical environments.

Studies identifying and describing intellectual disability nursing interventions with older adults is very limited. This is perhaps because in the UK there are likely to be very few or very limited specialist services for older adults with intellectual disability. Intellectual disability nurses have reported their involvement with pain management, behavioural support, problem solving when uncertainty around care exists, providing education for peers to develop an understanding of the changes caused by dementia, and providing environmental supports and staff training in the principles of person-centred dementia (Auberry & Cullen, 2016; Cleary & Doody, 2017; Cleary & Doody, 2017; Doody et al., 2013; Jenkins, 2012; Nelson & Carey, 2016).

Another area with a paucity of evidence regarding the interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses is end of life or palliative care. Some of the intellectual disability nursing interventions identified and described in current studies include shaping the nature of end-of-life care, influencing end-of-life decisions, detecting deterioration, and supporting relatives and helping medical staff to make more appropriate decisions, finding resources for end of life (Arrey, 2014; Bailey et al., 2014; McCarron et al., 2018; Ng, 2011; Wagemans et al., 2015).

What is clear in current literatures is that intellectual disability nurses do not only work directly with people with intellectual disability, but more importantly play significant roles in the delivery of effective interventions by supporting other health and social care professionals who work directly with people with intellectual disability. Research is therefore needed, not only to identify, describe, and explain the interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses, but to evaluate how intellectual disability nurses experience their involvement with these interventions.

Methods

The Survey Method

We use the term ‘survey’ to describe our method, our data collection method, and our data collection tool (Creswell and Cresswell, 2018). An online survey was attractive for the study because it offered an opportunity to collect quantitative data that was essential for us to achieve the objective of the study. Another reason for using the survey method was that it was possible for us to reach a large number of participants (n = 230) very quickly (Kelly et al., 2003), economically (Kelly et al., 2003), and easily (Creswell and Cresswell, 2018). We collected evaluation data on participants’ understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles and interventions.

Sampling and Participant Recruitment

We set out to recruit intellectual disability nurses registered by the Nursing and Midwifery Council of the UK. However, we received responses from other intellectual disability nurses registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland, as well as other registered nurses who exclusively worked with people with intellectual disability. Participants were therefore registered nurses and worked exclusively with people with intellectual disability. Ethics approval was obtained through the organisation of the lead researcher. Participants were recruited through professional networks. We used a combination of voluntary response sampling (McCombes, 2020) and snowball sampling (Creswell & Planko Clark, 2017). Blending voluntary response sampling with snowball sampling/chain-referral sampling provided an opportunity for participants to distribute the survey to their colleagues in their professional networks. Consent was obtained through the online survey form. We used the G*Power sample size calculator (Heinrich State University, 2020), and the appropriate sample size suitable for Pearson correlations and Pearson Chi-square tests was estimated at n = 225.

Data Collection

We used JISC Online Surveys platform (https://www.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/) to collect data.

Quantitative Data Analysis

We undertook descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of quantitative data (survey questions 1-8, 16-20) using SPSS 27.0 (IBM, 2020). We analysed the data for Pearson correlations (one-tailed). This was important for us to observe any relationships between participant characteristic variables, and response variables related to the interventions intellectual disability nurses undertook. For interpreting the Pearson correlation statistics, we followed the guidance provided by Cohen (1988). We undertook Pearson Chi-square tests on the data to test how likely it is that what we observed distribution was due to chance.

Findings and Discussion

We asked participants how confident they felt about their understanding of what intellectual disability nurses do (How confident do you feel in your understanding of what all learning (intellectual) disabilities nurses do?). Figure 1 show that a significant proportion of the participants were not confident at all (1.3%) or had little confidence (12.6%) in their understanding of what the role intellectual disability nurses entail. This lack of clarity has been previously reported (Mafuba, 2013). It is concerning that such a significant proportion of participants lack confidence in what nurses working with people with intellectual disabilities do. It is however important to point out that 86.1 % of respondents were very confident of their understanding of what intellectual disability nurses do.

Figure 1.

Participants’ confidence in understanding the intellectual disability nurse’s role.

We asked participants how confident they felt about their understanding of the nursing procedures intellectual disability nurses undertake (see Figure 2) (How confident do you feel in your understanding of all the nursing procedures learning (intellectual) disabilities nurses are expected to perform in roles?). A significant proportion of the participants were not confident at all (2.2%) or had little confidence (32.6%) in their understanding of the nursing procedures undertaken by intellectual disability nurses. This may mean that intellectual disability nurses may have to depend on other professionals to undertake nursing procedures within their own sphere of practice. More worryingly, this may contribute to people with intellectual disability having unmet needs.

Figure 2.

Participants’ confidence in understanding intellectual disability nursing procedures.

We asked participants how confident they felt in their understanding of interventions all intellectual disability nurses undertake to improve how other services or healthcare professionals deliver effective care to people with intellectual disability (see Figure 3) (How confident do you feel in your understanding of all activities learning (intellectual) disabilities nurses undertake in order to improve how other services or professionals deliver effective care to people with learning (intellectual) disabilities?). A significant proportion of the participants were not confident at all (1.3%) or had little confidence (25.5%) in their understanding of what interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses to enhance the impact of other services entail. It is concerning that such a significant proportion of participants lack confidence in what they can do to support other professionals and services to work more effectively with people with intellectual disability. The consequence of this may be that people with intellectual disability fail to access the appropriate services they may require.

Figure 3.

Participants’ confidence in understanding intellectual disability nurse’s role in enhancing impact of services.

We asked participants how confident they felt in their understanding of all activities intellectual disability nurses undertake to improve the quality of life of people with intellectual disability (see Figure 4) (How confident do you feel in your understanding of all activities learning (intellectual) disabilities nurses undertake in improving the quality of life of people with learning (intellectual) disabilities?). 76.1% of respondents were very confident, 0.4% were not confident at all, and 23.5% had little confidence in their understanding of what interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses to enhance the quality of life of people with intellectual disability entail. This may imply that people with intellectual disability may continue to experience health inequalities and inequities that should otherwise be addressed by intellectual disability nurses.

Figure 4.

Participants’ confidence in understanding intellectual disability nurse role in enhancing quality of life.

We asked participants their perception of the utility of a compendium that describe what intellectual disability nurses do as a guide for their own practice (see Figure 5). (A compendium describing what learning (intellectual) disabilities nurses do would be a useful resource for my practice). The compendium of intellectual disability nursing interventions is a catalogue of interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses as described in paper 2 of this four-part series. These findings indicate that 82.6% consider a compendium of intellectual disability nursing interventions a useful resource.

Figure 5.

Participants’ perceived utility of a compendium of intellectual disability nursing interventions.

Considering the lack of role clarity discussed above and, in an effort, to obtain a better understanding of intellectual disability nurses’ understanding of interventions they undertake and their attributes, we analysed the data to ascertain any relationships between variables that may contribute to this lack of clarity.

We interpreted the Pearson correlations using Cohen (1988)’s interpretation guide; Small (r = +-.10 to +-.29), Medium (r = +-.30 to +-.49), Large (r = +-.50 to +-1.0). Table 1 highlights variables with significant relations. The medium and large correlations in Table 1 mean that there is a strong or very strong correlation between the two variables. These findings clearly demonstrate that significant relationships exist between some of the variables. We observed significant correlations between intellectual disability nurses’ broader understanding of their role and their understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in effectuating nursing procedures, r = .44, p<0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p<0.05). The interpretation of this is that intellectual disability nurses need to keep their skills up to date to be more effective in the work they do with people with intellectual disability. We also observed a very strong correlation between intellectual disability nurses’ broader understanding of their role and their understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing the impact of services, r = .45 p<0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p<0.05). This is important because intellectual disability nurses support other health and social care services to deliver care to people with intellectual disabilities. Therefore, having clarity of what that role entails is important. We also observed a large correlation between intellectual disability nurses’ broader understanding of their role and their understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing quality of life, r = .39, p<0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p<0.05). This is an important finding because intellectual disability nurses play an important role in promoting the health of people with intellectual disability.

Table 1.

Interpretation of Relationships Between Variables.

Pearson correlations (n = 230)	r =	Significance	Interpretation (Cohen, 1988)
Age and Experience	.68	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Large
Age and Qualifications	.17	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .005, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Experience and Qualifications	.22	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Qualifications and Type of organisation	.18	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .003, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Qualifications and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing impact of services	.15	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .010, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Qualifications and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing quality of life	.15	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .012, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Country of practice and Type of organisation	.13	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .030, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Country of practice and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles	−.22	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Country of practice and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing impact of services	−.13	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .028, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Country of practice and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing quality of life	−.15	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .014, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Type of organisation and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles	−.11	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .045, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Small
Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in effectuating nursing procedures	.44	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Medium
Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing impact of services	.45	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Medium
Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing quality of life	.39	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Medium
Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in effectuating nursing procedures and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing impact of services	.56	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Large
Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in effectuating nursing procedures and Understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing quality of life	.50	p < 0.01 (Sig. = .000, n = 230, p < 0.05)	Large

The chi-square test determined a significant association between participants’ age and their qualifications, (X²) (value = 69.39, df = 24, N = 230, Sig. = .000, p =.05) (see Table 2).

Table 2.

Age and Qualifications Response Distributions.

The chi-square test determined a significant association between participants’ age and their length of experience, (X ²) (value = 200.06, df = 16, N = 230, Sig. = .000, p =.05) (see Table 3).

Table 3.

Age and Experience Response Distributions.

The chi-square test determined a significant association between the participants’ country of practice and their understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles, (X ²) (value = 24.57, df = 8, N = 230, Sig. = .002, p =.05). Of particular significance in these results are the proportions of the distributions of participants who have little confidence in their understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles. Participants from Northern Ireland constituted 9.1% of participants, and those from Scotland constituted 16.1%. There is disproportionate percentage of participants from Northern Ireland (24.1%) and Scotland (20.7%) who reported that they had little confidence in their understanding of the intellectual disability nurse role (see Table 4).

Table 4.

Country of Practice and Participant Understanding of Intellectual Disability Nursing Roles Response Distributions.

The chi-square test determined a significant association between participants’ country of practice and their understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability, (X²) (value = 15.96, df = 8, N = 230, Sig. = .043, p =.05). What is important to note in these findings are the overall proportion of participants who had little confidence in their understanding of the intellectual disability nurse role in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability (23.5%). The distribution between country of these participants is also disproportionate, England (48.1%), Scotland (24.1%), Northern Ireland (11.1%), Other countries (11.1%), and Wales (5.6%) (see Table 5).

Table 5.

Country of Practice and Participant Understanding of Intellectual Disability Nursing Roles in Enhancing Quality of Life Response Distributions.

The chi-square test determined a borderline association between the type of organisation participants worked in and their understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability, (X²) (value = 23.24, df = 14, N = 230, Sig. = .056, p =.05). Overall, 13.5% of participants had no, or had little confidence in their understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Also, it is important to note the disproportionate distribution participants who had little confidence in their understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability between types of employer; NHS (intellectual disability inpatient) (6.9%), NHS (intellectual disability community) (58.6%), private / voluntary sector organisations (6.9%), schools / children services (6.9%), and other employer organisations (13.8%) (see Table 6).

Table 6.

Type of Organisation and Participant Understanding of Intellectual Disability Nursing Roles in Enhancing Quality of Life Response Distributions.

The chi-square test highlighted a significant association between the participants’ country of practice and their understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles (X ²) (value = 24.57, df = 8, N = 230, Sig. = .002, p =.05). Of particular significance in these results are the proportions of the distributions of participants who have little confidence in their understanding of intellectual disability nurse roles. Participants from Northern Ireland constituted 9.1% of participants, and those from Scotland constituted 16.1%. There is disproportionate number of participants from Northern Ireland (24.1%) and Scotland (20.7%) who reported that they had little confidence in their understanding of the intellectual disability nurse role.

The chi-square test identified a significant association between participants’ country of practice and their understanding of intellectual disability nursing roles in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability, (X²) (value = 15.96, df = 8, N = 230, Sig. = .043, p =.05). What is important to note in these findings is the overall proportion of participants who had little confidence in their understanding of the intellectual disability nurse role in enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability (23.5%). The distribution by country of these participants is also disproportionate, England (48.1%), Scotland (24.1%), Northern Ireland (11.1%), Other countries (11.1%), and Wales (5.6%).

The lack of role clarity of the professionals working with people with intellectual disabilities has been consistently identified as one of the most common barriers to accessing appropriate services (Melville et al., 2006; Mafuba, 2009; NHS Health Scotland, 2004; Powrie, 2003; Phillips et al., 2004; Thornton, 1996). More recently, in the UK, Mafuba (2013), Mafuba and Gates (2015), and Mafuba et. al. (2015) highlighted the lack of role clarity among intellectual disability nurses themselves. This scoping survey included a significant proportion of participants from outside of the UK. This suggests that this lack of clarity may very well similar in other countries where intellectual disability nurses practice.

Findings from this study demonstrate that a significant proportion of participants from the UK and elsewhere were not very confident in understanding what the role of an intellectual disability nurse’s entails. In addition, a significant proportion of the participants were also not very confident in their understanding of what nursing procedures were undertaken by intellectual disability nurses, or in their understanding of interventions undertaken by intellectual disability nurses to improve the impact of services in meeting the needs of people with intellectual disabilities. What is also clear from these findings is that there appear to be correlations between lack of role clarity and the types of employer organisations and countries of the participants. Despite a significant proportion of participants being unclear about intellectual disability nurse roles and interventions which impact the lives of people with intellectual disability, it is surprising that; 4.8% of participants strongly disagreed, 2.6% of participants disagreed, and 10% with the idea of a compendium of intellectual disability nursing interventions that could be used as a guide for their own practice. Without clarity of what the expectations are for their own role it is no surprise other healthcare professionals will have varying interpretations resulting in further ambiguities. This lack of clarity of the interventions they can effectively undertake is likely to have a negative impact on health and healthcare outcomes for people with intellectual disability.

Conclusions

What is evident from this research is the wide range of interventions that intellectual disability nurses undertake in a complex sphere of practice. It is clear from the extent of these interventions that intellectual disability nurses need to constantly adapt and engage in a wide range of roles, whilst constantly assimilate emergent roles (Northway et al., 2017). The complexities and changing needs of people with intellectual disability, the changing environments in which intellectual disability nurses are practising, and the increasing expectation for intellectual disability nurses to meet health, healthcare, and social needs of people with intellectual disability across the lifespan was also clear within the research findings. Given the well documented complexity of health needs, poorer health, higher rates of co-morbidity, inequalities in health, poor access to health services and higher rates of premature mortality experienced by people with intellectual disabilities, further research is needed on intellectual disability nurses’ repertoire of interventions, more specifically in relation to maternity, frailty, and end of life care.

The evaluation data from this survey suggest and demonstrate a lack of clarity among intellectual disability nurses of the interventions they can effectively undertake. What is also clear from our findings is that there appears to be correlations between lack of role clarity and types of employer organisations and countries. This is likely to have negative impacts on the health and healthcare outcomes for people with intellectual disability. Further work should be undertaken by nurse leaders across countries to ascertain and address the reasons for the lack of clarity. Perhaps an internationally agreed definition of intellectual disability nursing may improve our understanding of their roles and interventions they undertake.

Limitations

The sample was not random and consequently it can be argued that it is unrepresentative. Therefore, although our findings are not generalisable and need to be understood from the context of participants who took part in the survey, they provide an important starting point for future work. Covid-19 restrictions impacted on the process of data collection.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the scoping review of literature was funded by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) Foundation, United Kingdom. The funders did not play any role in how it was conducted (Grant Number: 20200217).

Consent statement

We confirm that guidelines on participant consent have been met and any details of informed consent obtained are indicated within the text of the submitted manuscript.

Ethical statement

We confirm that Ethical Committee approval was sought from the University of West London (Approval No: 01032) and is acknowledged within the text of the submitted manuscript.

ORCID iD

Kay Mafuba

Data availability statement

Raw data were generated at the University of West London. Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Professor Kay Mafuba (kay.mafuba@uwl.ac.uk) on request. Data will be retained for at least 5 years.

References

Arrey

S. K.

(2014). Lived experiences of registered learning disability nurses and palliative care professionals in caring for people with communication difficulties and an intellectual disability experiencing distress in palliative care settings: a hermeneutic phenomenological study. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1783893689 (Accessed: 24th May 2018).

Auberry

Cullen

(2016). Implementation of an evidence-based seizure algorithm in intellectual disability nursing. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 20(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629515598216

Backer

Chapman

Mitchell

(2009) Access to secondary healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 22(6): 514–525.

Bailey

Doody

Lyons

(2014). Surveying community nursing support for persons with a learning disability and palliative care needs. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12105

Barr

Gilgunn

Kane

Moore

(1999). Health screening for people with learning disabilities by a community learning disability nursing service in Northern Ireland, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(6), 1482–1491. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01036.x

Brown

Chouliara

MacArthur

McKechanie

Mack

Hayes

Fletcher

(2016). The perspectives of stakeholders of intellectual disability liaison nurses: a model of compassionate, person-centred care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(7–8), 972–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13142

Brown

MacArthur

McKechanie

Mack

Hayes

Fletcher

(2012). Learning disability liaison nursing services in south‐east Scotland: a mixed‐methods impact and outcome study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(12), 1161–1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01511.x

Campbell

A. K.

(2011) Nurses’ experiences of working with adults who have an intellectual disability and challenging behaviour. The British Journal of Development Disabilities 57(112): 41–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1179/096979511798967179

Campbell

Martin

(2009). Reducing health inequalities in Scotland: the involvement of people with learning disabilities as national health service reviewers. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (1), 49–58.

10.

Chauhan

Kontopantelis

Campbell

Jarrett

Lester

(2010). Health checks in primary care for adults with intellectual disabilities: how extensive should they be? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54 (6), 479–486.

11.

Cleary

Doody

(2017). Nurses' experience of caring for people with intellectual disability and dementia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(5–6), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13431

12.

Creswell

J. W.

Cresswell

J. D.

(2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th edn.. London: Sage.

13.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Revised 3rd ed.. London: Sage.

14.

Dalgarno

M. F.

Riordan

S. A.

(2014) Forensic intellectual disability nursing: what’s it really like? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 5(4): 167–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-11-2014-0017

15.

Delahunty

(2017). Understanding the nurse’s role in identifying children with intellectual disability. Nursing Children and Young People, 29(6), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.7748/ncyp.2017.e863

16.

Doody

Markey

Doody

(2013). Future need of ageing people with an intellectual disability in the Republic of Ireland: lessons learned from the literature. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00716.x

17.

Drozd

Clinch

(2016). The experiences of orthopaedic and trauma nurses who have cared for adults with a intellectual disability. International Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Nursing, 22, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2015.08.003

18.

Emerson

Copeland

Glover

(2011). The uptake of health checks for adults with learning disabilities: 2008/9 to 2010/11. (Online). Available at: http://www.karentysonspage.org/Emerson_2011_Health_Checks_for_People_with_Intellectual_Disabilities_2008-9__2010-11.pdf (Accessed: 6 October 2020).

19.

Hatton

Emerson

(2015). Health disparities, health inequity, and people with intellectual disabilities. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 1–9.

20.

Heinrich State University . (2020). G* Power 3.1. Dusseldorf: Heinrich State University.

21.

IBM (2020) Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). Chicago, IL: IBM, SPSS Inc.

22.

Jenkins

(2012) Meeting the health needs of older people with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Nursing, 21(8), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.8.468

23.

Kavanagh

Aitken

Emerson

Sahabandu

Milner

Bentley

LaMontagne

Pirkis

Studdert

(2017). Inequalities in socio-economic characteristics and health and wellbeing of men with and without disabilities: a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline wave of the Australian longitudinal study on male health. BMC Public Health, 16(Supplement 3), 23–31.

24.

Kelly

Clark

Brown

Sitzia

(2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in healthcare 15(3): 261–266.

25.

Kerr

(2004) Improving the general health of people with learning disabilities. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 10: 200–206.

26.

LeDeR . (2020). The learning disability mortality review – Annual report. Bristol: University of Bristol Norah Fry Centre for Disability Studies.

27.

Lee

Kiemle

(2014). ‘It's one of the hardest jobs in the world’: The experience and understanding of unqualified nurses who work with individuals diagnosed with both intellectual disability and personality disorder. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28(3), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12125

28.

Llewellyn

(2005). An investigation into the advocacy role of the learning disability nurse. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Glamorgan, UK.

29.

Llewellyn

Northway

(2007). An investigation into the advocacy role of the learning disability nurse. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106075626

30.

Lloyd

J.L.

Coulson

N.S.

(2014). The role of learning disability nurses in promoting cervical screening uptake in women with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 18(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629514528829

31.

Lovell

Bailey

(2016). Nurses’ perceptions of personal attributes required when working with people with a learning disability and an offending background: a qualitative study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 24(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12326

32.

Lovell

Bailey

Kingdon

Gentile

(2014). Working with people with learning disabilities in varying degrees of security: nurses’ perceptions of competencies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(9), 2041–2050. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12362

33.

Lovell

Smith

Johnson

(2015) A qualitative investigation into nurses’ perceptions of factors influencing staff injuries sustained during physical interventions employed in response to service user violence within one secure learning disability service. Journal of Clinical Nursing 24(13–14): 1926–1935.

34.

MacArthur

Brown

McKechanie

Mack

Hayes

Fletcher

(2015). Making reasonable and achievable adjustments: the contributions of learning disability liaison nurses in ‘Getting it right’ for people with intellectual disabilities receiving general hospitals care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(7), 1552–1563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12629

35.

Mafuba

(2009). The public health role of learning disability nurses: a review of the literature. Learning Disability Practice, 12(4), 33–37.

36.

Mafuba

(2013). Public health: community learning disability nurses' perception and experience of their roles: an exploratory sequential multiple methods study. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1937411950 (Accessed: 6 October 2020).

37.

Mafuba

Gates

(2015). An investigation into the public health roles of community learning disability nurses, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12071

38.

Mafuba

Kupara

Cozens

Kudita

(2015). The importance of role clarity in community learning disability nursing – A critique of the literature. Learning Disability Practice, 18(8), 28–31.

39.

Marshall

McConkey

Moore

(2003). Obesity in people with learning disabilities: the impact of nurse‐led health screenings and health promotion activities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02522.x

40.

Marsham

(2012). An exploration of community learning disability nurses’ therapeutic role. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00702.x

41.

Mason

Phipps

(2010). Forensic learning disability nursing skills and competencies: A study of forensic and non-forensic nurses. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31(11), 708–715.

42.

McCarron

Sheerin

Roche

Ryan

AM.

Griffiths

Keenan

Doody

D'Eath

Burke

McCallion

(2018). Shaping the Future of Intellectual Disability Nursing in Ireland. Dublin: Health Services Executive, Ireland.

43.

McCombes

(2020). Understanding Different Sampling Methods. Retrieved from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/sampling-methods/ on 24 December 2020.

44.

McIlfatrick

Taggart

Truesdale-Kennedy

(2011). Supporting women with intellectual disabilities to access breast cancer screening: a healthcare professional perspective. European Journal of Cancer Care, 20 (3), 412–420.

45.

McKeon

(2009). A survey of clinical nursing skills in intellectual disability nursing, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 13(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629509103517

46.

Melville

C. A.

Cooper

S. A.

Morrison

I. J.

Finlayson

Allan

Robinson

Burns

Martin

(2006) The outcomes of an intervention study to reduce the barriers experienced by people with intellectual disabilities accessing primary healthcare services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50(1): 11–17.

47.

Nelson

Carey

(2016). The role of the nurse in assessing mobility decline in older people with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Practice, 19(9), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.2016.e1776

48.

J. S. W.

(2011) Knowing the patient well: intellectual disability nurses’ experiences of caring for terminally ill people with profound intellectual disabilities in residential care settings. PhD thesis, University of Greenwich.

49.

NHS Health Scotland (2004). Health needs assessment report: People with learning disability in Scotland. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland.

50.

Northway

Cushing

Duffin

Payne

Price

Sutherland

(2017). Supporting people across the lifespan: the role of learning disability nurses. Learning Disability Practice, 20(3), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.2017.e1841

51.

Ouellette-Kuntz

(2005). Understanding health disparities and inequities faced by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18 (2), 113–121.

52.

Pennington

Ring

Howlett

Smith

Redley

Murphy

Hook

Platt

Gilbert

Jones

Kelly

Pullen

Mander

Donaldson

Rowe

Wason

Irvine

(2019). The impact of an epilepsy nurse competency framework on the costs of supporting adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: findings from the EpAID study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 63(12), 1391–1400.

53.

Phillips

Morrison

Davis

R. W.

(2004). General practitioners’ educational needs in intellectual disability health. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48 (2), 142–149.

54.

Powrie

(2003) Primary healthcare provision for adults with a learning disability. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42 (4), 413–423.

55.

Quinn

B. L.

Smolinski

(2018) Improving school nurse pain assessment practices for students with intellectual disability. The Journal of School Nursing 34(6): 480–488.

56.

Ring

Howlett

Pennington

Smith

Redley

Murphy

Hook

Platt

Gilbert

Jones

Kelly

Pullen

Mander

Donaldson

Rowe

Wason

Irvine

(2018). Training nurses in a competency framework tosupport adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: the EpAID cluster RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 22(10). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta22100

57.

Robertson

Hatton

Emerson

Baines

(2014). The impact of health checks for people with intellectual disabilities: An updated systematic review of evidence. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(10), 2450–2462.

58.

Robinson

Griffiths

P. D.

(2007). Approaches to specialist training at pre-registration level: An international comparison. London: National Nursing Research Unit King’s College.

59.

Slevin

Sines

(2005). The role of community nurses for people with intellectual disabilities: working with people who challenge. Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 415–427.

60.

Straetmans

J. M. J. A. A.

van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk

H. M. J.

Schellevis

F. G.

Dinant

G. J.

(2007) Health problems of people with intellectual disabilities: The impact for general practice. British Journal of General Practice 57(534): 64–66.

61.

Taggart

Truesdale‐Kennedy

McIlfatrick

(2011). The role of community nurses and residential staff in supporting women with intellectual disability to access breast screening services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01345.x

62.

Thomas

Kerr

M. P.

(2011) Longitudinal follow-up of weight change in the context of a community-based health promotion programme for adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 24(4): 381–387.

63.

Thornton

(1996). A focus group inquiry into the perceptions of primary healthcare teams and the provision of healthcare for adults with learning disability living in the community. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23 (6), 1168–1176.

64.

Trollor

J. N.

Eagleson

Turner

Salomon

Cashin

Iacono

Goddard

Lennox

(2016). Intellectual disability health content within nursing curriculum: An audit of what our future nurses are taught. Nurse Education Today, 45, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.011

65.

United Nations . (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html

66.

Wagemans

A. M. A.

van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk

H. M. J.

Proot

I. M.

, et al. (2015) End-of-life decision-making for people with intellectual disability from the perspective of nurses. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 12(4): 294–302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12140

Understanding the contribution of intellectual disabilities nurses: Paper 3 of 4 - evaluation

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction and Background

Methods

The Survey Method

Sampling and Participant Recruitment

Data Collection

Quantitative Data Analysis

Findings and Discussion

Conclusions

Limitations

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Consent statement

Ethical statement

ORCID iD

Data availability statement

References