Gynecological Care for Women With Intellectual Disabilities: A Brazilian Study

Abstract

We aimed to identify the main challenges in the gynecological care and management of patients with intellectual disability by gynecologists. Gynecologists answered to online questionnaires about situations in which the professional reports their confidence in caring for patients with intellectual disability. Were studied 143 responses, 75% women. Among them, 53.8% felt apprehensive to conduct a routine gynecological screening, 60% were confident in advising about contraceptive services and examining the genitals. The greatest difficulty was indicating drugs to suppress menstruation and managing patients with severe intellectual disability. The female doctors were more prepared in the care of disability patients and recent certified gynecologists were more insecure. The main difficulty was time for examinations (39.2%) and the main solution was to improve medical training (64.2%). The main challenges of the gynecologist included the amount of time needed to provide clinical services, the lack of knowledge and skill; and ethical concerns.

Keywords

Intellectual disability gynecology contraception menstruation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agaronnik

Pendo

Lagu

DeJong

Perez-Caraballo

Iezzoni

L I

(2020) Ensuring the reproductive rights of women with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 45(4), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2020.1762383

Bahamondes

Fernandes

Monteiro

Bahamondes

. Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods. (2020) Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 66:28-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.002

Bastos

Deslandes

(2012) Sexuality and intellectual disability: Narratives of parents of adolescents. Physis 22(3): 1031-1046. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312012000300010

Berlan

Richards

Vieira

, et al. Best Practices for Counseling Adolescents about the Etonogestrel Implant. (2020) J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 33(5):448-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.06.022

Brown

H K

Kirkham

Y A

Lunsky

Cobigo

Vigod

S N

(2018) Contraceptive Provision to Postpartum Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 50(3), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12060

Hojat

Gonnella

J S

Nasca

T J

Mangione

Vergare

Magee

(2002) Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. The American journal of psychiatry, 159(9), 1563-1569. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2010) General characteristics of the population, religion and people with disabilities. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/biblioteca-catalogo?id=794&view=detalhes

Mast

M S

Kadji

. K

(2018) How female and male physicians' communication is perceived differently. Patient education and counseling, 101(9), 1697-1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.003

Raine-Bennett

Chandra

Armstrong

Alexeeff

. Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Oral Contraceptive, Intrauterine Device Use, and Fracture Risk. (2019) Obstet Gynecol. 134(3):581-589. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003414

10.

Roden

R C

Schmidt

E K

Holland-Hall

(2020) Sexual health education for adolescents and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: recommendations for accessible sexual and reproductive health information. The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 4(9), 699-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30098-5

11.

Sena

(2014) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - DSM-5. Statistics and human sciences: inflections on normalization and standardization. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis 11(2), 96.

12.

Shah

Norlin

Logsdon

Samson-Fang

(2005) Gynecological care for adolescents with disability: physician comfort, perceived barriers, and potential solutions. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 18(2), 101-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2005.01.004

13.

Wilkinson

Dreyfus

Bowen

Bokhour

(2013) Patient and provider views on the use of medical services by women with intellectual disabilities. Journal of intellectual disability research, 57(11), 1058-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01606.x

14.

Wołowicz

Kocejko

Ferenc

, (2020) Women with disabilities and access to gynaecological services in Poland. Disability & Society, 37:3, 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1833310

15.

World Health Association (WHO) (2009) Promoting sexual and reproductive health for persons with disabilities: WHO/UNFPA guidance note. Geneva. World Health Organization UN Population Fund. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/srh_for_disabilities.pdf

16.

World Health Association (WHO) (2012) World report on disability. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44575/9788564047020_por.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y