The research focuses primarily on how parents construct images of themselves and their children that diverge from the narrative of disability as a life tragedy and focus on emphasizing dignity and self-esteem.
Methods
The research was qualitative. A technique of an unstructured interview conducted with parents of people with intellectual disabilities was used to collect data. The analysis and interpretation were based on the procedures of the grounded theory.
Results and conclusion
Parents talk about their children as a source of pride, pointing to positive social experiences, social relationships and interactions in the public sphere. At the same time, parents emphasized the painful and exhausting experience of dealing with various types of institutions, thus highlighting the negative role of stigma in their lives and those of their children. Parents resisted framing their children’s 'deficits' and their own lives in terms of mere tragedy or misfortune.
AschbrennerKAGreenbergJSAllenSM, et al. (2010) Subjective Burden and Personal Gains Among Older Parents of Adults With Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatric Services61(6): 605–611. DOI:10.1176/ps.2010.61.6.605.
2.
BarnesCMercerG (1997) Doing Disability Research. Leeds: The Disability Press.
3.
BerbrierM (2002) Making minorities: cultural space, stigma transformation frames, and the categorical status claims of deaf, gay, and white supremacist activists in late twentieth century. Sociological Forum17(4): 553–591.
4.
BreivikJ (2005) Deaf Identities in the Making: Local Lives, Transnational Connections. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
5.
BogartRKLundEMRottensteinA (2018) Disability pride protects self-esteem through the rejection-identification model. Rehabilitation Psychology63(1): 155–159. DOI: 10.1037/rep0000166.
6.
BrittLHeiseDR (2000) From shame to pride in identity politics. In: StrykerSOwensTJRobertW (eds) White Self, Identity, and Social Movements. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 252–268.
7.
CameronC (2008) Further towards an affirmation model. In: CampbellTFontesFHemingwayL, et al. (eds) Disability Studies: Emerging insights and perspectives. Leeds: The Disability Press.
8.
CBOS (2013) Rodzina – Jej Współczesne Znaczenie I Rozumienie. [Family - its contemporary meaning and understanding]. BS/33/2013.
9.
CharmazK (2020) Experiencing Stigma and Exclusion: The Influence of Neoliberal Perspectives, Practices, and Policies on Living with Chronic Illness and Disability. Symbolic Interaction43(1): 21–45. DOI: 10.1002/symb.432.
10.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11.
CroninM (2018) ‘Special mothers’ in Ireland: gender, identity and the social construction of caring for a relative with an intellectual disability. International Journal of Care and Caring2(4): 575–580. DOI: 10.1332/239788218X15411706605330.
12.
BlumLM (2015) Raising Generation Rx: Mothering Kids with Invisible Disabilities in an Age of Inequality. New York: NYU Press.
Gąciarz (2014) W kierunku nowego modelu polityki społecznej. [Towards a new model of social policy]. In: GąciarzRudnicki (eds) Polscy (nie)pełnosprawni. Od kompleksowej diagnozy do nowego modelu polityki społecznej. [Polish disabled. From a comprehensive diagnosis to a new model of social policy]. Kraków:AGH, pp. 377–391.
15.
GlaserBG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
16.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
17.
GoffmanE (1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
18.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma. In: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
19.
GoodleyD (2014) Dis/Ability Studies: Theorizing Disableism and Ableism. New York: Routledge.
20.
GrayDE (2002) ‘Everybody just freezes. Everybody is just embarrassed’: felt and enacted sigma among Barents of children with high functioning autism. Sociology of Health & Illness24 (6): 734–749. DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.00316.
21.
GreenSE (2003) What do you mean ‘what’s wrong with her?’: stigma and the lives of families of children with disabilities”. Social Science & Medicine57(8): 1361–1374. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00511-7.
22.
GreenSE (2004) The impact of stigma on maternal attitudes toward placement of children with disabilities in residential facilities. Social Science & Medicine59(4): 799–812. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.023.
23.
GreenSADarlingRBWilbersL (2017) Struggles and joys: a review of research on the social experience of parenting disabled children. In: GreenSABarnarttSN (eds) Sociology Looking at Disability: What Did We Know and When Did We Know It?Bingley: Emerald, pp. 261–286.
24.
HannemS (2012) Theorizing stigma and the politics of resistance: symbolic and structural stigma in everyday life. In: HannemSBruckertS (eds) Stigma Revisited: Implications of the Mark. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 10–28.
25.
HoEJamesNBrownI, et al. (2013) Family Quality of Life of Polish Families with a Member with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research19(2): 36–41.
26.
IngstadBWhyteSR (2007) Disability in Local and Global Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
KaferA (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip. IN: Indiana University Press.
LewisSKaganCHeatonP, et al. (1999) Economic and psychological benefits from employment: the experiences and perspectives of mothers of disabled children. Disability and Society14(4): 561–575. DOI: 10.1080/09687599926127
MuszalaAZazulaM (2018) Problemy Rodzin Dzieci Z Zespołem Downa W Polsce – Stan Na Przełomie 2017 I 2018 Roku. [Problems of Families of Children with Down Syndrome in Poland - State at the Turn of 2017 and 2018]. Kraków: Pontifical University of John Paul II.
32.
OstrowskaA (2015) Niepełnosprawni W Społeczeństwie 1993-2013. [People with Disabilities in Society 1993-2013]. Warszawa: IFiS PAN
33.
PatrickR (2017) For Whose Benefit?: The Everyday Realities of Welfare Reform. Bristol: Policy Press.
34.
Palladino SchultheissDE (2009) To mother or matter; can women do both?Journal of Career Development, 36(1): 25–48. DOI: 10.1177/0894845309340795
35.
PałęckaASzczodryH (2011) Hipermacierzyństwo – na przykładzie matek osób z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną. [Hypermotherhood - on the example of mothers of people with intellectual disabilities]. In: PałęckaHSzczodryMWarat (eds). Kobiety w społeczeństwie polskim. [Women in Polish socjety]/Kraków: UJ, pp. 7–42.
36.
PisulaE (1998) Psychologiczne Problemy Rodziców Dzieci Z Zaburzeniami Rozwoju. [Psychological problems of parents of children with development disorders ]. Wrocław: UWr.
37.
RyanS (2005) 'People don't do odd, do they?' Mothers making sense of the reactions of others towards their learning disabled children in public places. Children's Geographies3(3): 291–305. DOI: 10.1080/14733280500352920.
38.
ScamblerG (2018) Heaping blame upon shame: 'weaponising stigma' for neoliberal times. The Sociological Revie66(4): 766–782. DOI: 10.1177/0038026118778177.
39.
ScamblerG (2020) A Sociology Of Shame And Blame: Insiders versus Outsiders. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
40.
ShearnJSturatT (2000) Maternal employment and family responsibilities: the perspective of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities13(3): 109–131. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3148.2000.00021.x.
41.
ShildrickT (2018) Poverty Propaganda: Exploring the Myths. Bristol: Policy Press.
42.
ShuttleworthRMeekoshaH (2013) The sociological imaginary and disability enquiry in late modernity. Critical Sociology39(3): 349–367. DOI: 10.1177/0896920511435709.
43.
SikorskaM (2009). Nowa Matka, Nowy Ojciec, Nowe Dziecko. O Nowym Układzie Sił W Polskich Rodzinach. Warszawa: Akademickie i Profesjonalne Press.
44.
SilvermanAMMoltonIRSmithAE, et al. (2017) Solace in solidarity: Disability friendship networks buffer well-being. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(4), 525–533. DOI: 10.1037/rep0000128.
45.
StraussALCorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
46.
SwainJFrenchS (2000) Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability. Disability and Society15(4): 569–582. DOI: 10.1080/09687590050058189.
TomczyszynD (2018) Podział obowiązków i władzy w rodzinie wychowującej dziecko z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną. [The division of duties and authority in a family raising a child with intellectual disability]. Opuscula Sociologica1(23): 65–82. DOI: 10.18276/os.2018.1-06
49.
TylerI (2020) Stigma: The Machinery of Inequality. London: Zed Books.
50.
TylerISlaterT (2018) Rethinking the sociology of stigma. The Sociological Review66(4): 721–743. DOI: 10.1177/0038026118777425.
51.
TwardowskiA (2009) Psychologiczne problemy ojców dzieci niepełnosprawnych. [Psychological problems of fathers of disabled children]. Szkoła Specjalna1: 4–17.
