‘It’s our everyday life’ – The perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway

Abstract

This study illuminates how adults with intellectual disabilities understand and describe their everyday life and its shortcomings when it comes to equal rights in the context of Norwegian community living. An inclusive research design, including nine persons with mild intellectual disability, two university researchers and two intellectual disability nurses from the municipality, was undertaken. An inductive thematic analysis of data identified three key themes: everyday life – context, rhythm and structure, social participation and staff – an ambiguous part of everyday life. Results show that service provision had institutional qualities; participants experienced lack of information and reduced possibilities for social inclusion and community participation like everyone else. More attention on the role of policy development, support staff and leadership, in relation to facilitating an everyday life with more user involvement, social inclusion and community participation of people needing support, is essential. Participatory, appreciative, action and reflection in workshops for persons with intellectual disabilities and support staff represent a promising approach to promote the voices and interests of persons with intellectual disabilities.

This article tells you about the everyday life of people with intellectual disabilities living in Norway. Nine people with intellectual disabilities worked together with two university researchers and two intellectual disability nurses in the community, in workshops. The people with intellectual disabilities liked to have their own apartment and going to work every day. They said that they wanted more social participation with friends and more participation in activities in the community, just like everyone else. They wanted to be treated with more respect by their staff. All participants in the project saw great value in working together and some of them are working together in a new project about involvement in the improvement of support services for people with intellectual disabilities.

Keywords

everyday life participation collaborative group approach people with intellectual disabilities workshops inclusive research PAAR

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

McConkey

(2006) The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 10(3): 275–287.

Beadle-Brown

Hutchinson

Whelton

(2012) Person-centered active support – increasing choice, promoting independence and reducing challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 25: 291–307.

Bigby

Frawley

Ramcharan

(2014) Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27: 3–12.

Björnsdóttir

Stefánsdóttir

(2014) It’s my life Autonomy and people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 19(1): 5–2. DOI: 1744629514564691.

Bond

Hurst

(2010) How adults with learning disabilities view living independently. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38(4): 286–292.

Cleaver

Ouellette-Kuntz

Sakar

(2010) Participation in intellectual disability research: a review of 20 years of studies. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54(3): 187–193.

Cooperrider

Whitney

(2005) Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Deguara

Jelassi

Micallef

, et al. (2012) How we like to live when we have the chance. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 40(2): 123–127.

Dusseljee

JCE

Rijken

Cardol

, et al. (2011) Participation in daytime activities among people with mild or moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 55(1): 4–18.

10.

Ellingsen

Kittelsaa

(2008) Å velge det trygge. “Choosing the safe. Intellectual disability and self-determination”. Fontene Forskning 2(10): 4–16.

11.

Finlay

Walton

Antaki

(2008) Promoting choice and control in residential services for people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society 23: 349–360.

12.

Fyson

Kitson

(2010) Human rights and social wrongs: issues in safeguarding adults with learning disabilities. Practice: Social Work In Action 22(5): 309–320.

13.

Health and Care Act (2011) Ministry of Health and Care Services. Available at: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2011-06-24-30 (accessed 20 April 2018).

14.

Ghaye

Melander-Wikmann

Kisare

, et al. (2008) Participatory and appreciative action and reflection (PAAR) – democratizing reflective practices. Reflective Practice 9(4): 361–397.

15.

Ghaye

(2010) Teaching and Learning Through Reflective Practice. A Practical Guide for Positive Actions. London and New York: Routledge.

16.

Guest

MacQueen

Namey

(2011) Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

17.

Gullestad

(1989) Culture and Everyday Life. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

18.

Haigh

Lee

Shaw

, et al. (2013) What things make people with a learning disability happy and satisfied with their lives: an inclusive research project. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 26: 26–33.

19.

Iriarte

Stockdale

McConkey

, et al. (2016) The role of support staff as people move from congregated settings to group homes and personalized arrangements in Ireland. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 20(2): 152–164.

20.

Joint Committee on Human Rights (2008) A life like any other? Human rights of adults with learning disabilities. Seventh report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights: Session 2007-08: HL 40-1, HC 73-1. London: Home Office.

21.

Lai

Elliott

Ouellette-Kuntz

(2006) Attitudes of research ethics committee members toward individuals with intellectual disabilities: the need for more research. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 3: 114–118.

22.

Lindahl

(2017) The Norwegian health care system. Available at: http://international.commonwealthfund.org/countries/norway/ (accessed 20 April 2018).

23.

Mansell

Beadle-Brown

(2009) Dispersed or clustered housing for adults with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 34(4): 313–323.

24.

McConkey

Abbott

Walsh

, et al. (2007) Variations in the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in supported living schemes and residential settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 51: 207–217.

25.

McConkey

Bunting

Keogh

, et al. (2017) The impact on social relationships of moving from congregated settings to personalized accommodation. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 1–11.

26.

McConkey

Collins

(2010) The role of support staff in promoting the social inclusion of persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54(8): 691–700.

27.

McConkey

Keogh

(2016) Personalization of services and supports. Evolution or revolution? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 20(2): 97–99.

28.

Nind

(2008) Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological challenges. National Centre for Research Methods NCRM/02.

29.

O’Brien

McConkey

Iriarte

(2014) Co-researching with people who have intellectual disabilities: insights from a national survey. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27(1): 65–75.

30.

Official Norwegian Report (2016) On equal terms. Eight promises for realizing rights for people with intellectual disabilities. Ministry of Children and Equality, Report No. 17.

31.

Report to the Storting (White Paper) (2012–2013) “Freedom and Equality”. Ministry of Children and Equality, Report No. 45.

32.

Scott

(2009) Making Sense of Everyday Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

33.

Scott

Foley

Bourke

, et al. (2014) “I have a good life”: the meaning of well-being from the perspective of young adults with Down syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation 36(15): 1290–1298.

34.

Statistics Norway (2016) Homebased services - target groups and organization. Report No. 13.

35.

Tøssebro

Søderstrøm

(2014) Goals fulfilled or visions cut off? Report . Trondheim: NTNU Social Science Research.

36.

Tøssebro

Kittelsaa

(2011) Large shared housings for people with intellectual disabilities. Some consequences. Report . Trondheim: NTNU Social Science Research.

37.

UN (2006) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Joint Committee on Human Rights.

38.

Verdonschot

MML

de Witte

Reichrath

, et al. (2009) Community participation of people with an intellectual disability: a review of empirical findings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 53(4): 303–3108.

39.

Weimand

Hedelin

Sällström

, et al. (2010) Burden and health in relatives of persons with severe mental illness: a Norwegian cross sectional study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 31: 804–815.

40.

Williams

Ponting

Ford

, et al. (2010) Skills for support: personal assistants and people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38: 59–67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00570.x.

41.

Williams

Porter

(2017) The meaning of ‘choice and control’ for people with intellectual disabilities who are planning their social care and support. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 30: 97–108.

42.

World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO.