Treatment outcomes from forensic intellectual disability services: The perspectives of patients and their family/carers

Abstract

Introduction:

Research investigating the treatment outcomes of forensic intellectual and developmental disability (FIDD) services has largely focused on the perspectives of clinicians and researchers. This study sought the perspectives of patients and family/carers on the outcomes important to them.

Methods:

Semi-structured consultation groups were conducted with patients in FIDD services (n = 21) and family carers (n = 6). Interview data were content analysed, and outcomes identified fell into three main domains (effectiveness, safety and patient experience).

Results:

The consultations identified outcome domains not considered in the published literature. Patients and carers also had differential perspectives on treatment outcomes commonly reported within literature. Illustrative quotes are used to evidence the domains.

Discussion:

This study is the first to investigate the outcomes of relevance to patients and their families. These views have been incorporated into an outcomes framework which will form the foundation of future prospective outcome studies.

Keywords

forensic intellectual disability learning disability treatment outcomes forensic mental health challenging behaviour secure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

Hiremath

Chester

, et al. (2011) Evaluation of treatment outcomes from a medium secure unit for people with intellectual disability. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 5(1); 22–32.

Cheshire

Chester

Graham

, et al. (2015) Home visits: a reflection on family contact in specialist forensic intellectual disability care. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 9(4): 186–195.

Donner

Mutter

Scior

(2010) Mainstream in-patient mental health care for people with intellectual disabilities: service user, carer and provider experiences. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 23(3): 214–225.

James

(2015) Family carers’ experience of the need for admission of their relative with an intellectual disability to an assessment and treatment unit. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 20(1): 34–54.

Longo

Scior

(2004) In-patient psychiatric care for individuals with intellectual disabilities: the service users’ and carers’ perspectives. Journal of Mental Health 13(2): 211–221.

Macinnes

Beer

Reynolds

, et al. (2013) Carers of forensic mental health in-patients: What factors influence their satisfaction with services? Journal of Mental Health 22(6): 528–535.

Morrissey

Geach

Alexander

, et al. (2017a) Researching outcomes from ‘forensic’ services for people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities: evidence synthesis and expert and patient/carer consultation. Health Services and Delivery Research 5(3): 1–102.

Morrissey

Langdon

Geach

, et al. (2017b) A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities. BJPsych Open 3(1): 41–56.

National Institute for Health Research (2010) Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research: A Handbook for Researchers. London: National Institute for Health Research.

10.

Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Faculty of Psychiatry of Intellectual Disability (2013) People with Learning Disability and Mental Health, Behavioural or Forensic Problems: The Role of In-patient Services. Faculty Report (FR/ID/03). London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.

11.

Support in Mind Scotland (2014) Exploring Family Carer Involvement in Forensic Mental Health Services. Edinburgh: Support in Mind Scotland.

12.

Talbot J

Cheung

O’Sullivan

(2015) Relative Justice: The Experiences and Views of Family Members of People with Particular Needs in Contact with Criminal Justice and Liaison and Diversion Services. London: Prison Reform Trust.